sproketholes

Joined on Apr 7, 2012

Comments

Total: 65, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

Uhhh... 24fps jpg+raw is basically cinematography sound-sync speed. Reduce that to just jpg and you might be able to shoot longer sequences of 20mpxl stills which begs the question about whats next in their pro video cameras???

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 17:30 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

sproketholes: Great to see Canon being serious about mirrorless for enthusiasts, though I suspect it will be 1 or 2 generations more before we have a Canon semi-professional mirrorless camera. I use the Sony A6300 as a benchmark for this, an astounding camera and a hard act to follow; especially if your product lines are competing with each other, rendering a degree of dumbing down models to protect others.

I suspect that Sony is causing Canon some anguish considering their investment in the C cameras, which as a concept, was definitely not on the table 8 years ago, and Sony pushing hard the concept of bridging the gap between stills and video in one form factor, and getting ever closer to achieving (and many would say has achieved), that goal with every new release.

As for the touch screen, personally, I dont like them, I have no interest, and on the one camera that I have that has it, I deactivated it. It makes sense to have one on cameras without viewfinders. I agree that they will probably have them on the next iteration of every camera they have out currently.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2016 at 01:37 UTC
In reply to:

sproketholes: Great to see Canon being serious about mirrorless for enthusiasts, though I suspect it will be 1 or 2 generations more before we have a Canon semi-professional mirrorless camera. I use the Sony A6300 as a benchmark for this, an astounding camera and a hard act to follow; especially if your product lines are competing with each other, rendering a degree of dumbing down models to protect others.

Yeah Id certainly agree about the economies of scale bias towards Canon and Nikon (if they enter into mirrorless other than the J and V cameras). I would not agree that Sony's lines are competing anywhere near what they are with Canon, this reveals a lack of confidence in some lines versus others. Many are bemoaning that the 5D4 doesn't do things the way they expected it to do, but its clear that Canon do not want to damage their relatively new to the game C lineup. That is too new and too much money poured into that system for a 5D4 to interrupt. Now theres this M5 which competes with their 80D on some level, and on others the rebels.

I'm curious to know how this will pan out for Canon in 10 years from now, whether they will have an EF mount mirrorless camera (whether that be purpose built or comes married to, but detachable EF mount adapter, as I cant see the point of a mirrorless camera that uses EF lenses if the aim is to simplify and downscale from the SLR form factor.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2016 at 01:35 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: Perhaps they got a defective Sony lens. The bottom and right edges look absolutely awful.

I am quite surprised that Sony lens image made it into the final review. If it were me, I would have sought another lens, and continued through as many as I could until I got one that was not flawed, and if I couldn't, then I would make a note of it in the review.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 04:04 UTC

Great to see Canon being serious about mirrorless for enthusiasts, though I suspect it will be 1 or 2 generations more before we have a Canon semi-professional mirrorless camera. I use the Sony A6300 as a benchmark for this, an astounding camera and a hard act to follow; especially if your product lines are competing with each other, rendering a degree of dumbing down models to protect others.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 03:49 UTC as 60th comment | 6 replies

You should give Vincent Van Gogh a call..

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 10:53 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

Ive seen quite a few story tellers from Seattle make great films, about tother places, and go about getting funding and distro via more established routes. But my hat is off to Tim for being able to make a story about the place he lives in. And not just make a story but make it and work it for real change and policy change.
Its a real challenge for even the hardest working and most inspired documentarian in a group of other creative professionals, to actually turn the workload around and make something insightful and in depth from your own home.
I had to leave my home in order to see it.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2016 at 09:44 UTC as 20th comment

Curious!
looks like it means business. Add a nice A series lens or an adapted macro ...oooh

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 22:57 UTC as 119th comment
On photo Horse Chestnuts in the The Surprise Inside: Seeds In Their Pods challenge (4 comments in total)

Oh man, these are gorgeous! Great subject matter, and nicely executed.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 06:13 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Sony adds XAVC S and high bitrate video to a6000 (186 comments in total)

What WAS the data rate before firmware 2.0?

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 21:49 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

2eyesee: Another APS-C body, but Sony have abandoned APS-C E-mount lens development, and announcing this camera on the same day as three FE lenses is really rubbing our noses in it.

I don't care how good the AF is if after all these years Sony still can't offer a decent kit lens. I got the A6000 when it first came out and returned it because the 16-50 kit lens was so bad. The 18-55 is no better.

Though I think its impossible physically, and improbable, it would be so hot if Sony could find a way to provide an accessory optic to place between the rear element and the sensor that could be used to focally reduce the E-mount FF to 1.5x, that would be completely magic. That or bring out more lenses, premium lenses.
More APSC premium lenses Sony, please. More, MORE MOAR!!

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 19:58 UTC
In reply to:

Thematic: α6300 even offers 14-stop latitude at S-Log3 setting.

nice!

My buddy just got himself an A5100 and it has on-screen markings for video like my A7s does. I certainly hope the A6300 will have them also. Having a safety zone, center point and 2.35:1 crop markings is defacto on pro video cameras, and is, in truth, essential on any camera that hopes to compete with them.
Im not ready to go 4k yet, but Im extremely exited about what 6k Downsampled to 4k Downsampled to HD will look like. I suspect it will give my external video recorder a run for its money (apart from the ability to shoot directly to SSD in an edit ready format..).

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 19:51 UTC
In reply to:

noflashplease: The price isn't a surprise. We always knew it was going to be expensive. I'm not sure why Nikon bothered? Was anyone really begging for a GoPro crossed with a Ricoh Theta? The action camera market feels like it's already past its peak. Nikon jumped on the bandwagon just after the parade was over. Oh well, we can look forward to the eventual clearance before the "Keymission 360" ever hits the market.

Well, this straddles two worlds. The action camera part of it appeals less to me then the VR possibilities.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 22:06 UTC

Dang I was hoping for $399. Well its still epically lower than a sack load of gopros and a doodad to hold them all..

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 22:04 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

papa natas: 921,600 Screen dots....
El Cheapo strikes again!!!

And you are paying approximately $0.10850694444 for each one of those dots.
oh my god life is so hard..

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:52 UTC
In reply to:

2eyesee: Another APS-C body, but Sony have abandoned APS-C E-mount lens development, and announcing this camera on the same day as three FE lenses is really rubbing our noses in it.

I don't care how good the AF is if after all these years Sony still can't offer a decent kit lens. I got the A6000 when it first came out and returned it because the 16-50 kit lens was so bad. The 18-55 is no better.

Paddy C
if you are after primes, I can attest that the 20mm is at f2.8 as sharp as my Zeiss 24/1.8. If there is any other complaint about image quality, you should be using the Capture 1 software that comes free with your camera, because it turns a $250 lens into something that 5 years ago would have cost you a lot more to achieve.
Gary Fong is right, listen to Sony and if you use the camera the way they suggest and offer you the flexibility of doing so, you will be more than satisfied with your purchase.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:46 UTC
In reply to:

jaxson: Lack of sensor stabilisation is the main drawback for me.

Why is no one mentioning this?

Its really not a big deal with a camera that is this speed, you can always lean on something.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:41 UTC
In reply to:

Amateurbob: I have a Sony Nex 3n. Turning the camera on and taking a picture I get “Camera Error turn camera off and then on again”. Looking on the internet one finds this is not an uncommon error for Sony cameras. Even the newer expensive full frame Sony cameras can have the error, which is almost exclusively seen in Sony cameras although it may pop up in a few other brands. I tried all the fixes mentioned on the internet and finally fixed the problem by purchasing off EBay for a good price an Olympus PL5. I have found nothing on the internet where this problem appeared in any Olympus camera. I like Sony cameras but will stay away.
I might add that if one sends their camera to Sony repair, the problem will get fixed at a cost. If the camera can be fixed and the problem can appear in any of Sony’s cameras, why do they not design the problem away in their newer cameras?

For $125 (or 4 trips to the grocery store for a single person) you can have another one in great condition. If you want, you can upgrade to a Nex 5n for an additional $75. Im not being facetious, I understand no everyone who owns these cameras lives in the first world.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:39 UTC
In reply to:

lacix: Great! Magnesium body, Viewfinder res. up to 2.359,296, faster focus, 4K, 100Mbps. I'm in!

100mbps is quite mind blowing for the size. In fact 6k downsampled 4k is of the charts.. There is a lot to love about this camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:35 UTC
In reply to:

Eugene232: price is ridiculous..
who will by this camera for $1100 while Olympus PEN-F with smaller sensor costs $1200 or Fujifilm X-Pro2 costs $1700?

I will buy it. I will replace my A7s with this camera because it is extremely fast, small, light, tough, has zero pixel binning 4k, and it has all that I ever needed any stills or video camera to have.
I have two A6000's and they completely reshaped my thinking on professional cameras. I have shot news documentary and video on them and there is nothing else out there at or near that price point, that even comes close.
The A6300 exceeds my hopes on an upgrade to the A6000, though on the surface of it and from the rumor mill stand point I can see how people might be disappointed. Those fears are unfounded once to sit down and read the specs in detail and look at what you actually use a camera for.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:32 UTC
Total: 65, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »