Silat Shooter

I sold mine before the A7r V was announced.  So I think that helped me.  Mine was mint too.  I wound up selling mine in Ebay.  I hate the hit that Ebay takes, but locally I was getting ridiculous ...

I think the A1 would be amazing to have.  Clicks my key buttons including no viewfinder blackout.  That's a sweet feature in use.  I just cringe at the price, even used.

Fair question. I'm sure GAS played into but to be fair I do enjoy Fall Foliage landscape images and in the summer months I travel to National Parks.  So the 60 megs really works well for those ...

I agree with you, it's just the price of the A1 II will likely be $6500 or a little more. That's really steep for me. I'm comfortable buying clean used cameras these days but that would mean...

Appreciate the feedback.  I sold my A7r IV primarily for one reason.  Not ever image I shoot requires 61 megs.  So many times for parties, family gatherings, vacation snapshots, it was overkill.  ...

I'm tossing the decision to buy the A7rV, having sold my A7r IV.  Seems like a clear choice, but during the wait time, I picked up a clean used A6600.  It's been enjoyable to shoot with a smaller ...

I have both and carry both in the Ricoh leather case each on my belt.  I just have the 28mm more forward, than the 40mm on my belt.  That's how I know which to reach for.  Works for me.  And ...

24 f2.8G 40m f2.5 G 75mm f1.8 Samyang Super small and light, IQ is great.

I have the new 70-200 and it's awesome but with the 2x converter the 100-400 is better (have that too).  So hopefully a better converter is near, as rumored.  But like others here, use these ...

I definitely think $300 for the G 24mm is a very good deal.  I have it and like it alot, and paid more for it.

Gave up on B&H for this one, got lucky and found one locally at a nearby Camera Store, one the few that still exists.  It was a good experience too.  Now that B&H has to apply tax to out of state ...

I've been shooting more with my A6600, and a lens I wish I could have is a 50-200 f2.8 with stabilization and internal focus and COMPACT in weight and size.  That would be with me all the time.

Like others have mentioned, it's a big spread from 20 to 50mm.  And how small is small for you.  For me, even though for instance the 24mm f1.4GM is regarded as small and light, it's too big for ...

I'm in this camp.  Have both and just got back from a trip carrying both.  I was curious to see which I gravitated to more.  Was thinking if I found myself preferring one over the other maybe I ...

This is fair question, I have a 1" Super Zoom camera and full frame.  While full frame is clearly better in IQ there's a but....  if your zoom only goes to 200mm and you have to crop the image to ...

I like the idea.  I'm sure once you figure out the correction in framing vs what's actually being covered, you can make mental adjustments for.

Interesting chat going on here.  Definitely has come up for me too.  When I travel I prefer an all in one like the 28-200 and something small a light like the 24mm G.  I'll only take the 100-400 ...

You may want to check with smaller local camera stores.  That's how I got mine.  You might get lucky and find one as there are some dealers that filled their wait-list or someone on that list ...

I'm leaning on selling my 24-70 f2.8, 35mm f1.8 for starters.  But I go back and forth, hate to sell glass especially.  I have a 24mm, and likely considering a 16-35 to add.

I have both.  I'm sure I Don't need to keep both but...  As a few have stated here, the IQ is very similar with the Tamron having a warmer cast to the colors.  I find the Sony focuses faster with ...