tecnoworld

tecnoworld

Joined on May 4, 2010

Comments

Total: 959, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On photo Carla... in the Beautiful caucasian female faces challenge (32 comments in total)

who won? the picture or the subject? ;)

btw...both are wonderful

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 10:15 UTC as 17th comment
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (450 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Incredible how a lower performance camera in 2017 can get almost the same votation of the higher performing NX1 2.5 years ago.

I'm not saying the D7500 is bad, which is not. I'm rather saying the NX1 should have scored in the 9x and not in the 8x.

Perhaps that would have helped samsung selling its cameras? Who knows, perhaps not, but it would be nice to be evaluated correctly (compared with other cameras reviewed here).

I totally agree about the subjectivity.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 12:41 UTC
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (450 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Incredible how a lower performance camera in 2017 can get almost the same votation of the higher performing NX1 2.5 years ago.

I'm not saying the D7500 is bad, which is not. I'm rather saying the NX1 should have scored in the 9x and not in the 8x.

Perhaps that would have helped samsung selling its cameras? Who knows, perhaps not, but it would be nice to be evaluated correctly (compared with other cameras reviewed here).

Perhaps if it had scored a 95 it would have made big news around the web.

Anyway this scoring system is really flawed IMO.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 12:16 UTC
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (450 comments in total)

Incredible how a lower performance camera in 2017 can get almost the same votation of the higher performing NX1 2.5 years ago.

I'm not saying the D7500 is bad, which is not. I'm rather saying the NX1 should have scored in the 9x and not in the 8x.

Perhaps that would have helped samsung selling its cameras? Who knows, perhaps not, but it would be nice to be evaluated correctly (compared with other cameras reviewed here).

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 08:25 UTC as 18th comment | 6 replies

Since for me the nx1 is still the best hybrid in the world, when coupled with s lenses, I'll go on using it for many years. It exceeds the likes of 7d-ii and d500 for picture quality, rivals them for af performance, kills them for video. Only premium ff can do better and not in all the cathegories.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 07:50 UTC as 13th comment
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2724 comments in total)

Even if I don't like Sony in general, and Sony cameras in particular (way too expensive, very bad UI, decent lenses are more expensive than other manufacturers') I have to insist that they are the only company trying to innovate, after samsung decided to quit.

Canon is ridicolous (see 6D-ii or 5D-iv) and Nikon is good only for the top end (D5 and D500).

We'll see what sony can do with the next iteration of high end FF (eg A7R III and A7S III). The A9 is really nice but definitely too expensive.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2017 at 15:13 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Incredible how canon is un-innovative.

oh, yah, and also the "Mark II" writing on its front. Very cool camera for 2007. Ops, I forgot a "1". Or not?

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2017 at 15:08 UTC

Incredible how canon is un-innovative.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2017 at 22:13 UTC as 21st comment | 2 replies
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2724 comments in total)
In reply to:

Miki Nemeth: The Sony A9 killed my GAS. Since I have it, I have zero interest in other cameras. Before that I was interested in Sony A7RII/A6500, Canon M5/5DIV, Panasonic GH5 and especially Fujifilm X-T2. But the A9 is so dams brilliant and utterly versatile, that it replaces all of these. It's an unbelievable great camera. I've been using it for about a week now, and I am blown by its capabilities. Before actually buying I spent a whole day in a Sony showroom experimenting with the A9; still, I found it every day (much) better than I had expected. Looking through the high quality EVF is, as if I was watching a utterly crisp HD TV.
I encourage you fellow photographers, sell all your irrelevant crap you have accumulated during the past years, and buy an A9. The A9 is worth every pennies I paid for it; and I am happy that I've sold my gear pile.

when an A9 II with more MP even more fps comes in a couple of years (or less), your GAS will be back to you :)

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2017 at 16:48 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: The samsung NX1 was released in november 2014...

It was 3x better than this camera in anything.

So why, Canon, can't you even get close to a camera done in 2014 by a refrigerator manufacturer?

wow, nobody told my kit it has been killed :) actually, it thinks it's alive and hence he kicks the various sony, nikon, canon & co that arrive today on the market :) cool...it's a real super zombie :)

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2017 at 08:06 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: The samsung NX1 was released in november 2014...

It was 3x better than this camera in anything.

So why, Canon, can't you even get close to a camera done in 2014 by a refrigerator manufacturer?

Ehm...I have a nx1, nx300, nx200, nx100 and a lot of nx lenses.

It's very natural to make comparisons, to let people know of better alternatives.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2017 at 05:22 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: The samsung NX1 was released in november 2014...

It was 3x better than this camera in anything.

So why, Canon, can't you even get close to a camera done in 2014 by a refrigerator manufacturer?

Black: much better video, better sensor, more mp, better native lenses, much faster af.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2017 at 13:24 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: The samsung NX1 was released in november 2014...

It was 3x better than this camera in anything.

So why, Canon, can't you even get close to a camera done in 2014 by a refrigerator manufacturer?

Captura, nx1000 has nothing to do with nx500 or nx1.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 18:18 UTC
On photo Waffles with fruits in the Food photography (desserts) challenge (8 comments in total)

one for me, please :) Gorgeous picture.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2017 at 07:22 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Nikon D5600 review: making connectivity a snap? (369 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I think it's incredible that such cameras still have a market. I guess it's due to the fact that most potential buyers totally ignore everything that's not Canon/Nikon.

But still kicking and delivering...

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 18:06 UTC
On article Nikon D5600 review: making connectivity a snap? (369 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I think it's incredible that such cameras still have a market. I guess it's due to the fact that most potential buyers totally ignore everything that's not Canon/Nikon.

And in fact I use a samsung NX1 :)

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 11:06 UTC
On article Nikon D5600 review: making connectivity a snap? (369 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I think it's incredible that such cameras still have a market. I guess it's due to the fact that most potential buyers totally ignore everything that's not Canon/Nikon.

That's exactly my point. Try to shoot action (serious action) or taking slow motion videos with that camera. Impossible or almost that.

Everything is up to needs and expectations. Some ppl buy a camera just to take snapshots, but then...that's why smartphones are taking over camera market. They are more than enough for so many ppl (unable to distinguish image quality or to exploit peculiar camera features).

If someone shoots occasional jpg pictures of panoramas, flowers, cats and relatives, than a smartphone is good enough for them, especially when compared with a low/medium level camera with a kit lens.

It's when you need those things that you dismissed that the camera gets important.

Link | Posted on May 23, 2017 at 09:44 UTC
On article Nikon D5600 review: making connectivity a snap? (369 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I think it's incredible that such cameras still have a market. I guess it's due to the fact that most potential buyers totally ignore everything that's not Canon/Nikon.

The fact that he asked which camera he should buy says it all. He is no expert and no enthusiast.

If I ask him about the tech specs of any of the cameras he considered he couldn't probably answer. The same goes for the exact technical reason for which he has chosen this camera vs another one.

He would probably say...brand recognition, look and feel, perhaps price, availability.

Can you say I'm wrong?

And.. I'm no fan of anything, at least not a loyal fan. I'm a temporary fan of the "best for my needs" tech, always ready to change brand.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2017 at 22:57 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I have many samsung cameras.

Haha sorry was replying to the next thread

Link | Posted on May 22, 2017 at 16:52 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (376 comments in total)

I have many samsung cameras.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2017 at 16:00 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
Total: 959, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »