tecnoworld

tecnoworld

Joined on May 4, 2010

Comments

Total: 858, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

They should have developed a nx2, rather than this...

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2016 at 21:33 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EOS M3 real-world sample gallery updated (97 comments in total)
In reply to:

raindance: I know people complain that Nikon and Canon are not taking mirrorless seriously, but these companies are also not stupid.

1) Right now there really isn't a strong market for mirrorless bodies: average joe consumer just wants a DLSR with a kit lens, it's perfect for most applications and still has numerous advantages over a mirrorless body including price.

2) The technology just isn't there. Battery life needs to last longer, most consumer do NOT want to carry around multiple batteries. Ergonomics and handling are still poor on most bodies especially compared to a traditional SLR. Some lenses are incredibly disproportionate to body size like on the Sony A series. EVFs are still problematic under low light and blackout and other issues persist.

Try Samsung nx1. Technology is definitely here. Since 2014.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2016 at 18:39 UTC
On article Rock Solid: Canon 1D X Mark II Review (403 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: 4k video in NX1 is so much better:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=canon_eos1dxii&attr29_1=samsung_nx1&attr29_2=nikon_d5&attr29_3=sony_a7sii&attr72_0=c4k&attr72_1=4k&attr72_2=4k&attr72_3=4k&normalization=full&widget=378&x=0.11355154481492812&y=-0.36536297516124605

Of course, but this canon costs about 5x times a NX1. Hence, you'd expect something more than an overall comparable camera.

If price, size, weight, resolution and video are no issue, then this canon can perform on par or better than nx1, but I really cannot understand why it scored higher here, where those factors should have been taken into consideration.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2016 at 13:26 UTC
On article Rock Solid: Canon 1D X Mark II Review (403 comments in total)

4k video in NX1 is so much better:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=canon_eos1dxii&attr29_1=samsung_nx1&attr29_2=nikon_d5&attr29_3=sony_a7sii&attr72_0=c4k&attr72_1=4k&attr72_2=4k&attr72_3=4k&normalization=full&widget=378&x=0.11355154481492812&y=-0.36536297516124605

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 17:20 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies

I'm keeping an eye on fuji as a possibile successor for my nx system, but...they need to do much better than this t2 to convince me. This camera 'almost' matches the 2 years old nx1 in some aspect, while being behind in others.

Perhaps a t3. Or t4.

Their lenses are very interesting, though.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 10:25 UTC as 37th comment
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: it's nice to see bickering and arguments over fuji vs canikon vs sonys. I hope this fight continues for a long time. We need all the options. i do hope samsung makes a comeback. they make excellent cameras.

nx1 simply wins over this camera under each aspect. And is 2 years old...

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2016 at 15:41 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

Nx1 is still technically superior, butwe all know how things go in high tech sectors. Sooner or later, someone will surpass it. My guess is not before than 2020, possibly later.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 14:22 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

You're of course wrong. While nx1 is still superior, spec wise, to x-t2, I like also this new camera and probably, if I weren't invested in nx, I'd buy this in place of nx1, simply because fuji is committed.

Of course, having already a superior product, I won't swap, but I can foresee that in few years (4-5) fuji will match, and eventually even surpass, nx1.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 09:38 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)

As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 07:47 UTC as 191st comment | 4 replies
On photo Norwegian Coast in the Best Landscape with at least one Lighthouse in it. challenge (12 comments in total)

Gorgeous. The building looked like a Dalek, from the small preview :)

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 09:17 UTC as 6th comment
On article OnePlus 3 announced with 16MP stabilized camera (23 comments in total)

Just ordered one. I don't need a terrific cameraphone, since I use cameras 95% of times, but having a decent one in my pocket could help for that remaining 5%.

I don't care about no SD slot, as long as the memory is 64GB. Rather, I'd have liked a QHD display. But that'll be left for oneplus 4 :)

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2016 at 09:41 UTC as 4th comment
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

Hflm, I don't defend anything. I'm constantly stunned at how good the nx1 is, even against very top end cameras like d5.

Did you shoot 10000+ images with nx1? If not, how can you comment about its af? It is totally different from a dslr. But it's as effective and more precise, if use correctly.

And...yes, I always shoot iso 100. What's the problem with it? I can transfer my images via wifi to my laptop, batch process them in lightroom and send some 28mp stills in few minutes via email, if I want to. And probably, nx1+laptop will weight less than a d5 body only :-D

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 22:44 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

Ok.

P.s. I was talking about the bodies. And, for you, iso 3200 is low iso? Or, even better, iso 100 pushed by 6-7 stops? Where nx1 destroyed d5, as shown above?

Of course, if you don't care about video, don't care about having more than 20mp and require shooting with 350mm or more, and you don't mind spending 7-20× (depending on lenses) you can go d5.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 15:12 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

Try the nx1.

Your comparison is obviously ridicolous.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 11:19 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

Of course not. You pay 5x less and you have a great camera for 15fps shooting at 28mp with the above exposure pulling capabilities. And much better 4k video, of course.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 06:53 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

You're right of course. Ppl won't consider nx1 as an alternative to d5. They should, but they won't.

Just a hint, though. Nx1 at iso 100 and then pushed by n stops, is (much) better than nx1 at iso 100*2^n.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2016 at 19:16 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)

interesting:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=compare&widget=333&x=0.7832595575519146&y=0.9531108400211032

and

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=nikon_d5&attr144_1=samsung_nx1&attr144_2=nikon_d500&attr144_3=canon_eos1dxii&attr146_0=100_6&attr146_1=100_6&attr146_2=100_6&attr146_3=100_6&attr177_3=off&normalization=full&widget=333&x=0.39718362052992395&y=0.42052365640790085

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2016 at 13:38 UTC as 55th comment | 13 replies
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

VisualFX: How does this get better rating then Samsung NX1 that does 15fps, 4K, 205 Phase AF, 153 cross-type,etc, and fast AF of 0.055s, all two years ago?

Depends on what you mean with that. Even now, you can buy it from the internet.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2016 at 06:54 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

VisualFX: How does this get better rating then Samsung NX1 that does 15fps, 4K, 205 Phase AF, 153 cross-type,etc, and fast AF of 0.055s, all two years ago?

Thermidor, that's a generic milc vs dslr argument and I can understand your position. But this is not pertinent to the specific cameras. What I (and others) say is that nx1 offered all (ad actually more) the features of d500, in a smaller/better package, lower price and 1.5 years ago.

Yet, it scored lower.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 09:23 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

VisualFX: How does this get better rating then Samsung NX1 that does 15fps, 4K, 205 Phase AF, 153 cross-type,etc, and fast AF of 0.055s, all two years ago?

As tbclass said,evf in some new mirrorless cams is gorgeous. Actually I would not shoot with an ovf anymore, not even under torture ;-) after trying the one in nx1.

As to battery life. 500+ shots per battery and the capability to charge via usb while working -> powerbanks -> unlimited life.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 16:49 UTC
Total: 858, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »