tecnoworld

tecnoworld

Joined on May 4, 2010

Comments

Total: 898, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)
In reply to:

mysteryhole: The new Oly 10 years ago would have read like science fiction. At the time of this post there are 1013 comments. For a camera most of these people are not going to buy, there sure is a lot of clucking going on. If the camera came with Taylor Swift as a personal assistant, cluckers would be wanting Dolly Parton. Out of the billions of digital photos taken, only an infinitesimal number are printed. This reads like a giant peeing contest to me.

shattered, I'm curious to hear from you why the NX1 sensor in NX1 body is not something to ponder :) What's wrong with it, beside being discontinued (despite being superior to 99,9% other cameras)?

Hazy: h.265 is the present for advanced users and the future for everyone. I've been editing h.265 videos from NX1, w/o transcoding them, for many months, now. And they keep 3x less space, preserving huge quality.

With your way of thinking, every innovation is bad up until it's not spread among the masses.

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2016 at 13:41 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Best m4/3 to date, but still not enough (and still way too expensive) to make me consider departing from my (imo still superior) NX1.

Perhaps mk iii or iv will eventually match and surpass it, but...at what cost?

Ross, what you say is very true. But perhaps, if NX1 had been more "endorsed" by customers at launch , now it would still be there. Or perhaps not, we'll never know.

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2016 at 14:14 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)
In reply to:

mysteryhole: The new Oly 10 years ago would have read like science fiction. At the time of this post there are 1013 comments. For a camera most of these people are not going to buy, there sure is a lot of clucking going on. If the camera came with Taylor Swift as a personal assistant, cluckers would be wanting Dolly Parton. Out of the billions of digital photos taken, only an infinitesimal number are printed. This reads like a giant peeing contest to me.

2 years ago the nx1 was out with even higher specs and h265 real time codec for 4k and 120@2k. Not science fiction there? :-P

Link | Posted on Nov 27, 2016 at 11:54 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Best m4/3 to date, but still not enough (and still way too expensive) to make me consider departing from my (imo still superior) NX1.

Perhaps mk iii or iv will eventually match and surpass it, but...at what cost?

Stu, yes. I didn't say more expensive than 2 years ago, but 1 year ago (you could find it at about 1100$ new back then). Now it's back to almost its full price, if you can find a new unit.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2016 at 23:35 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: Best m4/3 to date, but still not enough (and still way too expensive) to make me consider departing from my (imo still superior) NX1.

Perhaps mk iii or iv will eventually match and surpass it, but...at what cost?

Actually the cost of NX1 was much lower from the beginning, at 1499$. Today it's probably more expensive than one year ago, due to the scarce availability. I can't but agree about the fact that it won't be developed any further, which is a huge pity. Its S lenses and a couple of less "noble" ones are really gorgeous, though.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2016 at 19:32 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1222 comments in total)

Best m4/3 to date, but still not enough (and still way too expensive) to make me consider departing from my (imo still superior) NX1.

Perhaps mk iii or iv will eventually match and surpass it, but...at what cost?

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2016 at 19:19 UTC as 47th comment | 8 replies
On article Fast Five: Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V Review (405 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: It looks like the old samsung MIni NX is much better at ISO 1600:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_dscrx100m5&attr13_1=samsung_nxmini&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=1600&normalization=full&widget=431&x=0.5734155913588055&y=-0.2158528560230277

How is this possible?

Tbcass, I whish I were a boy ;-)
Anyway, ppl calling others 'fanboy' should be banned from the forums.
If the link is 3200 vs 1600, that's my fault since I first compared iso 3200 for both cameras, then stepoed back to 1600.
Just go 1600 vs 1600 and see which is better.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 23:31 UTC
On article Fast Five: Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V Review (405 comments in total)

It looks like the old samsung MIni NX is much better at ISO 1600:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_dscrx100m5&attr13_1=samsung_nxmini&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=1600&normalization=full&widget=431&x=0.5734155913588055&y=-0.2158528560230277

How is this possible?

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 13:50 UTC as 50th comment | 6 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 Review (677 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I really can't get such a high score for a 16MP, m43 camera able to shoot only at 6fps, with average AF and subpar battery life...all this in late 2016.

Readonly, do you think your reply is intelligent? To me, sounds really childish.

Anyway be happy with your 84% yet low performing camera :-D

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 10:53 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 Review (677 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: I really can't get such a high score for a 16MP, m43 camera able to shoot only at 6fps, with average AF and subpar battery life...all this in late 2016.

Not for a camera that scored 84 on DPR, sorry.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 16:10 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 Review (677 comments in total)

I really can't get such a high score for a 16MP, m43 camera able to shoot only at 6fps, with average AF and subpar battery life...all this in late 2016.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 09:24 UTC as 30th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

tecnoworld: 2000$ for a M43 camera that's not even remotely as good as my 2 year old APS-C NX1....LOL

Nx1 has dis for video, btw, but I never cared anout ibis since ai prefer ois in lenses and I don't use lefacy. Weather sealing in nx1 is very good, did you test it? H.264 is a dinosaur, less efficient and old, good for ppl with old computers, but...if you soend 2k on a m43 camera, then you can spend 1.5k on a decent processing machine.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:41 UTC
In reply to:

geoson: I can make a case for a high performance APSC vs aan
entry level 35mm. I think m43 should at least be cheaper
than a D500.

Or a nx1.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:35 UTC
In reply to:

tecnoworld: 2000$ for a M43 camera that's not even remotely as good as my 2 year old APS-C NX1....LOL

melchiorum, of course it depends on the use that you do of the camera, but the most advanced APSC sensor on the market (even after two years) can hardly be matched by a M43 sensor with 40% less MP...it can be extremely good for a m43 sensor, but really can't match the 28MP BSI APSC one in detail, sharpness, high iso, shadows recovery.

So...NX1 seems to be better in video and better in stills. They both are weather sealed and seem to have very good AF...

What have I cherry picked, after all?

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 10:37 UTC
In reply to:

tecnoworld: 2000$ for a M43 camera that's not even remotely as good as my 2 year old APS-C NX1....LOL

28MP BSI APS-C sensor with full sensor 6k redout downsampled to 4K on the fly, real time H.265 encoding up to 180Mbit/sec. These specs alone seem from a more modern camera, rather than from a 2 year older one.

Besides, I don't know if the Oly can do 120fps at 1080. I don't find this in the specs.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 10:24 UTC

2000$ for a M43 camera that's not even remotely as good as my 2 year old APS-C NX1....LOL

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 09:46 UTC as 147th comment | 10 replies
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2175 comments in total)
In reply to:

VisualFX: Why Fuji insists on silly gimmicks like the "power booster grip" that increases fps? Can't they build that directly in the camera like Samsung NX1 and 15fps? That camera didnt require additional power to get 15fps.

hioe: NX1 can do all you mentioned W/O the grip :)

Oh...and it records h.265 on the fly...up to 180mb/sec, with the third party hack. To have the equivalent bitrate for h.264 you need to multiplicate that figure by 1.5-4X.

Of course, if the hw is "older" and less powerful, it would/could need the workaround :)

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2016 at 15:41 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2175 comments in total)
In reply to:

PKDanny: Good Review! 86% Gold!

Richard, thanks for the insights, really appreciated.

What I was trying to state (I'm not a native English speaker) was that NX1, out in november 2014, is still able to favourably compete with the top cameras, out just now. This could have been "rewarded" with an even higher score, at the moment of review.

It's as if we had a CPU with the performance of a Pentium 100, when all the other CPUs were still 486 and 386.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2016 at 14:58 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2175 comments in total)
In reply to:

VisualFX: Why Fuji insists on silly gimmicks like the "power booster grip" that increases fps? Can't they build that directly in the camera like Samsung NX1 and 15fps? That camera didnt require additional power to get 15fps.

No way it will build a camera like NX1. It lacks the hw tech to do that. The sensor in NX1 is - at least - 5 years ahead of the sensor in this camera (built by sony, btw). Not to mention the computational compartment...the CPU in NX1 is ultra powerful, just consider that it can encode h.265 on the fly.

Perhaps, in 2020, there will be another camera "matching" NX1 (not beating it). Of course, if manufactured by Sony or Fuji, it will score north of 90% here in DPR :D

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2016 at 14:53 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2175 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: After the mighty nx1 came out 2 years ago, I thought that no high end ILC camera would have come w/o the full sensor readout in 4K.

Jimi, actually on s's forum there are lots of ppl looking for it.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2016 at 18:57 UTC
Total: 898, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »