tecnoworld

tecnoworld

Joined on May 4, 2010

Comments

Total: 868, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article YI M1 Mirrorless ILC First Impressions Review (360 comments in total)

I'm looking fwd to seeing more (and higher end) chinese cameras. Especially, I'd love to see an APS-C and a FF one, costing une fifth than current japanese ones.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 13:15 UTC as 55th comment
In reply to:

Johnnew Archibald - SMGJohn: Why is Canon even trying at this point?
Also people complaining this camera is for stills, well if it was then why the F did Canon include video features? It seems to me you guys do not completely align with the marketing Canon does.

Which just goes to show how detached Canon users are to Canon themselves.
Samsung NX1 still is king of the most balanced camera with both excellent photo and good video now with hack so it is even better.

Canon gives us this, at this price point you would expect great features, if I wanted a camera that just takes pictures, I go buy a God damn Nikon not a Canon they cannot even get their dynamic range right...

NX1 will be beaten around 2020. Not before. Mark my words.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:05 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (1919 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thomas Kachadurian: Excellent fast review.

Now a question. Do you think the not-revolutionary video spec is an acknowledgement that dslr video had its peak and is now going to go to cameras like the black magic and canons own video cameras. Is this a shift back to still photo roots? Or just the best they could do?

I for one am glad to see a camera with key still improvements over ground breaking video capabilities.

osd, I still wonder where samsung would have been now, had they continued to develop the NX line. Possibly no other manufacturer would have a chance against it.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 13:02 UTC
In reply to:

tecnoworld: This m5 is less than a samsung nx30 from 2013. Let alone the incredibile nx1.

Who cares if nx is discontinued? They are superior to new cameras and will be for years to come.

rrccad: happy to be with a dead system, if it's superior to "alive" ones :D

And about the dead mount:
https://www.produzionidalbasso.com/project/turn-your-samsung-nx-camera-to-full-frame/

:P

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 12:35 UTC
In reply to:

LMBC: Canon Technology is lagging behind it's competitors. This camera should be released 4 years ago. I went to Samsung NX1 (I also own a Canon 7d) because I want a better / lighter camera, which Canon didn't had that time and still does not have today!
4K video is not important to everyone (it is to me) but after seeing the last three Canon cameras, (7d mk2, 5D mk IV, M5) I'm almost sure that Canon doesn't have the techonology to put a 4k processor in a small body. Canon 5D mk IV 4k video implementation is a joke because they don't have the image/video processors that can deliver h264 or h265 in a small body.
Canon can you give me an NX1 equivalent in a near future so that I can use my (great) Canon Glass? I can't even use my EF lens on m5 :( :(

Yes, NX1 was many years ahead of its time, and even now, two years later, it's so much better than this camera.

Peter: A6300 overheats, NX1 (which was out earlier) does NOT. And with the hack, it can go all the way up to 180mb/sec in 4K and 120mb/sec in 2K@120fps. And the focal reducer is on its way:

https://www.produzionidalbasso.com/project/turn-your-samsung-nx-camera-to-full-frame/

Coming next, there will be an intelligent adapter to use canon lenses on NX. There are a couple of clever persons working on this and I have big hopes. So we'll fill the gap for the next 4-5 years, i.e. until Canon can release something which is about as good as NX1 from 2014.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 UTC

This m5 is less than a samsung nx30 from 2013. Let alone the incredibile nx1.

Who cares if nx is discontinued? They are superior to new cameras and will be for years to come.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 07:34 UTC as 178th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

tecnoworld: uh...a big commercial?

p.s. my oneplus 3 is >= than this iphone in most (important) features. It's not water resistant and does not have an optical zoom, but has more MP (hence a sort of zooming, when resized to 12MP). And costs one half or less.

Did I mention low light? That said, considering how the tele lens in the iphone is a slow one, I still think that 16MP cropped to 12MP will give a sort of digital zooming which is possible as good as the optical one from iphone.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 21:51 UTC

uh...a big commercial?

p.s. my oneplus 3 is >= than this iphone in most (important) features. It's not water resistant and does not have an optical zoom, but has more MP (hence a sort of zooming, when resized to 12MP). And costs one half or less.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 13:19 UTC as 230th comment | 2 replies
On photo Breakfast... in the It's in the water challenge (5 comments in total)

great capture! is that a severe crop or a resize of the original photo?

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2016 at 19:18 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On article Rebel in your pocket: Canon EOS M3 Review (462 comments in total)
In reply to:

DWare: No integrated evf ... not even slightly interested.

lassoni: dpr forgot about the existence of NX line.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2016 at 12:56 UTC

They should have developed a nx2, rather than this...

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2016 at 21:33 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EOS M3 real-world sample gallery updated (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

raindance: I know people complain that Nikon and Canon are not taking mirrorless seriously, but these companies are also not stupid.

1) Right now there really isn't a strong market for mirrorless bodies: average joe consumer just wants a DLSR with a kit lens, it's perfect for most applications and still has numerous advantages over a mirrorless body including price.

2) The technology just isn't there. Battery life needs to last longer, most consumer do NOT want to carry around multiple batteries. Ergonomics and handling are still poor on most bodies especially compared to a traditional SLR. Some lenses are incredibly disproportionate to body size like on the Sony A series. EVFs are still problematic under low light and blackout and other issues persist.

Try Samsung nx1. Technology is definitely here. Since 2014.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2016 at 18:39 UTC
On article Rock Solid: Canon 1D X Mark II Review (417 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: 4k video in NX1 is so much better:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=canon_eos1dxii&attr29_1=samsung_nx1&attr29_2=nikon_d5&attr29_3=sony_a7sii&attr72_0=c4k&attr72_1=4k&attr72_2=4k&attr72_3=4k&normalization=full&widget=378&x=0.11355154481492812&y=-0.36536297516124605

Of course, but this canon costs about 5x times a NX1. Hence, you'd expect something more than an overall comparable camera.

If price, size, weight, resolution and video are no issue, then this canon can perform on par or better than nx1, but I really cannot understand why it scored higher here, where those factors should have been taken into consideration.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2016 at 13:26 UTC
On article Rock Solid: Canon 1D X Mark II Review (417 comments in total)

4k video in NX1 is so much better:

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=canon_eos1dxii&attr29_1=samsung_nx1&attr29_2=nikon_d5&attr29_3=sony_a7sii&attr72_0=c4k&attr72_1=4k&attr72_2=4k&attr72_3=4k&normalization=full&widget=378&x=0.11355154481492812&y=-0.36536297516124605

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2016 at 17:20 UTC as 28th comment | 2 replies

I'm keeping an eye on fuji as a possibile successor for my nx system, but...they need to do much better than this t2 to convince me. This camera 'almost' matches the 2 years old nx1 in some aspect, while being behind in others.

Perhaps a t3. Or t4.

Their lenses are very interesting, though.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 10:25 UTC as 37th comment
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1297 comments in total)
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: it's nice to see bickering and arguments over fuji vs canikon vs sonys. I hope this fight continues for a long time. We need all the options. i do hope samsung makes a comeback. they make excellent cameras.

nx1 simply wins over this camera under each aspect. And is 2 years old...

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2016 at 15:41 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1297 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

Nx1 is still technically superior, butwe all know how things go in high tech sectors. Sooner or later, someone will surpass it. My guess is not before than 2020, possibly later.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 14:22 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1297 comments in total)
In reply to:

tecnoworld: As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

You're of course wrong. While nx1 is still superior, spec wise, to x-t2, I like also this new camera and probably, if I weren't invested in nx, I'd buy this in place of nx1, simply because fuji is committed.

Of course, having already a superior product, I won't swap, but I can foresee that in few years (4-5) fuji will match, and eventually even surpass, nx1.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 09:38 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1297 comments in total)

As said elsewhere, in a couple more iterations, the Fuji X-T will be better than NX1. I'm happy for this, since NX1 has no upgrade path, having been discontinued...so a X-T4 in 2020-2021 or so, with 6k or 8k, perhaps an organic sensor, faster fps and better af, will be the APSC to get.

As to high iso, they are already quite near and sometimes X-T1 is better. But I still prefer NX1:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=fujifilm_xt2&attr13_1=samsung_nx1&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&normalization=compare&widget=380&x=0.007495363232005332&y=0.32048469286961934

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 07:47 UTC as 196th comment | 4 replies
On photo Norwegian Coast in the Best Landscape with at least one Lighthouse in it. challenge (12 comments in total)

Gorgeous. The building looked like a Dalek, from the small preview :)

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 09:17 UTC as 6th comment
Total: 868, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »