Slaven

Joined on Jun 20, 2012

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10
In reply to:

ewelch: Android? Well, there you go. This camera will be good for about six months, and then the OS won't be updated any more, and Marshmallow is already old. So don't expect this "camera" to last you as long as a real camera.

I've got the latest 6.0.1 for my Xiaomi Mi3 in august. Mi3 had been introduced to the market in late 2012.
By the way, it is equipped with 1/3" camera, which (combined with "incamera" software) produces quite good pictures... Of course they are "good" for websize only.

P.s. To ensure that you have not considered my message as an advertisement, I have to say, that the latest Xiaomi Mi5 - is "the most bending" smartphone in the world (=

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 19:19 UTC
On a photo in the Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 G Master real world samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Is this strange distribution of OOF zones caused by field curvature? Or this is just geometry of the scene?

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2016 at 00:11 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

nutscracker: Where is the new APS-C lenses? Sony's current APS-C lenses lineup is a junk

Oh, I forgot E 10-18 f/4 - pricey, but, well, it even outperforms Zeiss prime Touit 12/2,8.

APS-c E-mount lineup do have gaps and 'crappy focals' (like 24, or 200+, or something with high speed). But it's definetly not a junk.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:03 UTC
In reply to:

nutscracker: Where is the new APS-C lenses? Sony's current APS-C lenses lineup is a junk

Do not agree. Primes like 35/1,8 OSS and 50/1,8 OSS give very pleasant image. 18-105 f/4 G is good for reportage shooting. 20mm pancake is okeish pankace. Tele- lenses could bu used via adapter... The only thing I miss is rebranded Samyang 8/2,8 fisheye with electronic coupling.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 20:30 UTC
In reply to:

Correction man: I can remember "Mitakon" lenses back in the 70's and 80's a Japanese brand ... I take it these Chinese lenses have nothing to do with the Old Mitakon other than revising the name ????

I can remember Zeiss lenses made in Germany...

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 11:52 UTC

Well, even that pricy ($399+309) kit have more sence, than Lomography Minitar 32 f/2,8 for $350. At least, Heliar is sharp enough.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 23:35 UTC as 30th comment
On a photo in the Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Preview Samples sample gallery (4 comments in total)

- Hello, my name is Bob, and I shoot in jpeg with a full frame.
- Hi, Bob!

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2012 at 12:42 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo PT3C9478-ACR-processed in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

- Hello, my name is Bob, and I shoot in jpeg with a full frame.
- Hi, Bob!

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2012 at 12:42 UTC as 3rd comment

More pictures of lens, please!
Also, it's very interesting, how subj looks on the camera's body.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 05:41 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply

> Aperture (Maximum) _F4.0_ – F5.6

4.0? Realy? )))

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 06:02 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10