whoosh1

Dpreview staff seems quite excited by the D850 - unlike many other cameras. It is a more newsworthy in a boring landscape for cameras - hence there will be a quicker review for it.

MattiD80 - I think you are overthinking this. Most regular people are more accustomed to a cell phone or a small D3400 with kit lens kind of camera at the most. They are unlikely to perceive a ...

I will repeat some relevant statements from an earlier post by me: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57686729 ========== Having been an owner of both the 70-200 f/4 and the f/2.8 my experience ...

That's totally waste of cyberspace. No explanation - no nothing.

Contrary to what most people who replied think - it's a really good lens. Only point of contention maybe the price. About the prime - think more about your needs before deciding 60mm micro or ...

+1 - I agree. Unfortunately you are right on the money - er... pun not intended :). "Unfortunately" because one if forced to be not price conscious for wildlife - beyond the expensive ...

True - but at least the battery is same as D8x0. And its lighter. Yes - but it takes only one seller to decide he/she needs to sell for you to be able to snap up a deal on a pro body like D5 - as ...

I understand these - and probably should not have generalized - but I only listed the higher fps & better autofocus as they are considerations which affect what I can shoot with a particular ...

Amazing pictures Kris in your signature! I had not seen them earlier. In your hands any combo will make sense :) Primary/backup basis makes sense - I was referring more to a simultaneous 2-body ...

Your upgrade path makes sense.

Larry - you make my point: it makes less sense to upgrade from D810+D500 to D850+D500. Please see my post in response to Tony's post: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60066751

Fine - but in that case you are more likely to be using the D850 for the shorter focal lengths and D500 for the longer focal lengths. Many high fps applications/better autofocus would likely be at ...

Point 1: Extra flexibility compared to D500 (some caveats of course) As "T O Shooter" mentions - for some wildlife photographers at least, on paper it does provide most of what a D500 does and more ...

While I respect his reviews, Nasim himself has said in his review under the sharpness section that his 2 copies of 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR had all kinds of issues. So this time, I would not put as ...

I have had 70-200 f4 (and 70-200 f/2.8 VR I & VR II). I now have the 70-200mm f/2.8E FL VR. No doubt the newer 70-200mm f/2.8E is sharper than any of those other lenses.

I cannot speak for Thom - but this was his response (at https://nikonrumors.com/2017/08/29/list-of-recommended-lenses-for-the-nikon-d850-camera.aspx): It's lenses I've tested with the D810 and ...

As an answer to In one of the Nikonrumors article comments: https://nikonrumors.com/2017/08/29/list-of-recommended-lenses-for-the-nikon-d850-camera.aspx/#more-115629 (1) Question : (1.1) Is this list in any ...

Yes - I agree that if he deems all the other lenses (70-200mm f/2.8 VR II, 70-200 f/4 and 80-400) as not good enough - it is unlikely 200-500 would be. But it is just Thom's opinion - if you have ...

If you see the article below written with the D800e/D810 in mind (and number of pixels have not changed dramatically from D800e/D810 to D850) - he does mention 200-500 as one of the more ...

LOL :-). I wish they could just give a certain discount toward purchase of any lens you want - without tying it to a specific lens like the 24-120 f/4. On the other hand I understand certain lenses ...