whoosh1

Thanks for your perspective.

I already have the Z50 that I had got used from B&H for a European trip 3+ years ago as a backup camera when I did not have a second Z7 (actually a Z7 II). So I am aware of the relative sizes of ...

Thanks for your pics!

Yes - I know all that. But I just wanted to see some examples as I have not really used a non full frame camera for last 4-5 years. I did have a Fuji X-T20 with the 18-55 a while ago but the ...

I am interested in seeing night shots or dusk shots taken by folks on a tripod with the kit lens DX 16-50mm. I could not find many on 500px.com search. Thinking of taking that combo on a trip and ...

No text :)

This is great news! With these specs can be a single travel lens for some trips - currently I take Nikon 14-30mm f/4 S and 24-120mm f/4 S. Hopefully Nikon will make the next iteration of the...

Currently also have 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E AF-P and 70-200mm f/4 VR that I use but will stop using after a suitable Z replacement/s. I also have AF 16mm f/2.8D fisheye and AF 180mm f/2.8D but I do not ...

Looks like you did not understand what I meant - as your comment is in a completely tangential direction.

As I said, I am not talking only this particular lens. Naysayers keep telling others why certain technically possible lens will never be released or released after a long long time like 10 years - ...

Not just this lens - many lenses. Are you guys this much fun in real life? Life of parties - shooting down all the ideas :)

You already have 35-150mm - so a 17-28mm f/2.8 would complement it well. In fact, if your budget would allow it, even a Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S would complement your Tamron 35-150mm. Or even ...

+1. He has always been helpful to everybody regardless of whether they know him or not. His voice has been the most measured and probably the most knowledgeable voice in the camera information ...

That really does not change the comparison from a bad comparison to a good comparison - even before movies were available for viewing as VHS/DVD tapes for viewing long beyond the year in which the ...

Not really - the comparison is not quite valid actually. In the case of movies, historically, only the ones from the current year are seen by filmgoers in the movie theaters. Which is unlike ...

I agree on this. Thanks for your post. I do think the awards should be renamed to be "New Product of the Year" - it makes it a lot clearer.

DPreview is a business and has to make money - which is fine and nothing wrong about it. We as users should be aware of follow the money aspect of dpreview - but I believe many of us are aware as ...

Yes - people have differing opinions and people on dpreview fora even more - and most of them are not important. If we go by that criteria, we do not need any discussions and no forum needed :).

Interesting article - worth a read: https://www.bythom.com/newsviews/is-there-any-usefulness-in.html Personally I think if dpreview called it "New product of the year", it may be a more valid award ...

This is actually a good idea - and what I did for a trip to Italy in summer. I was planning to carry a 70-300mm with the 14-30 and 24-120, but I could make do without it. As far as I know, between ...