naththo

Lives in Australia Adelaide, Australia
Works as a Hobby
Joined on Oct 13, 2011
About me:

Hard of hearing, live with parent, hobby are weather, photography and computers.

Comments

Total: 1306, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Unfortunately, the quality will not match film scanner of Nikon Super Coolscan 9000ED or Plustek Opticfilm 120 or Braun 120F.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2018 at 06:51 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply

TV already out with those HDR stuff before monitor. Bit late for that hey?

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2018 at 10:09 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Sample gallery: Tamron 10-24mm F3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD (69 comments in total)

Good lens but don't like ACR post processing, awful colours to me, its not Canon colours. :\

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2017 at 10:38 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II sample reel (36 comments in total)
In reply to:

J A C S: I do not care much about video but to me 60 frames per second beats 4K at lower frame rates. Resolution in time is not less important than resolution in space.

Majority of tv show, football match every week in Australia are all still using 1080P and they haven't plan to go for 4K yet, still many years away for tv show to start 4K. Plus 4K use up too much data is a major downside to me though.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 16:55 UTC
On article Sample gallery: Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art (89 comments in total)
In reply to:

NicoPPC: Looks great!

DPR may think about hoy they handle their samples gallery. The ACR produce, so far one can see, terrible result in comparaison over RAW's convertor.

Maybe use the camera jpeg or makers raw's convertor.. But, looking at the ACR's result is pretty bad for any lens/camera...

ACR does clip sunset image and it make colour look awful, Captureone do not. Cos its flaw in ACR camera profile, any profile even your custom profile won't work well with sunset.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 09:29 UTC
On article Sample gallery: Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art (89 comments in total)
In reply to:

NicoPPC: Looks great!

DPR may think about hoy they handle their samples gallery. The ACR produce, so far one can see, terrible result in comparaison over RAW's convertor.

Maybe use the camera jpeg or makers raw's convertor.. But, looking at the ACR's result is pretty bad for any lens/camera...

Yeah I am real struggle with ACR conversion because of colours though. I think captureone does a bit better than ACR.

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2017 at 14:10 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: This green/blue tone in every single photo...Now I know: My Canon EOS M5 must secretly be made by Nikon.

So is my monitor calibrated with i1 Display Pro and using Dispcal. I don't see problem with most of my photos with this calibrated monitor. Its all adobe colour profile problem that they select in calibration setting.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 20:01 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: This green/blue tone in every single photo...Now I know: My Canon EOS M5 must secretly be made by Nikon.

If you look at gardens sample in greenhouse from normal JPEG it looks better than edited to taste, less radioactive green.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 09:24 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: This green/blue tone in every single photo...Now I know: My Canon EOS M5 must secretly be made by Nikon.

Thats Adobe Standard Profile is the one has too much green on it.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 09:22 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-A3 sample gallery (86 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): I am impressed by these shots! Is it colors? contrast? shadows and highlights? sharpness? Why do they look far better than Nikon D7500?

Yes Nikon is the winner for far more neutral image.

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2017 at 15:11 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

lingccp: X-A3 produces sharper image on my screen. Is this real?

For x-tran like most reviewer said best use iridient, much better result than LR/ACR. LR/ACR is mainly good for conventional sensor bayer.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 10:01 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-A3 added to studio scene comparison (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

lingccp: X-A3 produces sharper image on my screen. Is this real?

Probably Fuji aggressive sharpening algorithm. Should not use too much sharpening on images that is produced by bayer sensor rather than x-tran sensor. X-tran sensor need special sharpening that is different to bayer sensor.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2017 at 11:57 UTC
On article DPReview on TWiT: Is the Sony a9 worth $4500? (223 comments in total)

I still think I stick to A7RII or so for the balance of both landscape shooting and action shooting. I prefer this way.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 06:59 UTC as 14th comment
On article LG G6 camera review (126 comments in total)
In reply to:

naththo: That is much more honest review than blind vote camera in other page, your daylight image sample looks underwhelmed, not nice sample so it looks like camera is not doing well with this situation of difficult lighting and in plain lighting. I am sticking to Samsung cos it does better for me, I have is S6 Edge and I am happy with this, it does support RAW but I like Samsung algorithm of colours and contrast better but sharpening seems aggressive similar behaviour to Sony. Glad to see this is a proper review, not nonsense blind vote photos sample in other page.

What I meant was: I saw some scene that like in grey stone or so should be grey not green cast in some of LG sample, and the shadow looks quiet bland/boring not much contrast. That is why it is underwhelmed sample to me. It needs better algorithm to have better outcome out of JPEG. Probably not very good algorithm so far from LG Im sorry to say.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 12:27 UTC
On article LG G6 camera review (126 comments in total)

That is much more honest review than blind vote camera in other page, your daylight image sample looks underwhelmed, not nice sample so it looks like camera is not doing well with this situation of difficult lighting and in plain lighting. I am sticking to Samsung cos it does better for me, I have is S6 Edge and I am happy with this, it does support RAW but I like Samsung algorithm of colours and contrast better but sharpening seems aggressive similar behaviour to Sony. Glad to see this is a proper review, not nonsense blind vote photos sample in other page.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 10:34 UTC as 55th comment | 1 reply
On article First shots from new Nikon 28mm F1.4E ED (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bambi24: All of these shots really could have been made on a smartphone, which tend to be around 28mm equivalent.

They're not demanding on the AF system, nor were they shot in challenging lighting conditions.

I like the shots, it's not that, but they could have been made on any camera or smartphone.

Don't feed that MaxEyeSore Pentax Troll.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 15:31 UTC
On article Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR sample gallery (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

ProfHankD: I hate Provia. To me, these all look way too contrasty -- with shadows all blocked-up and whites just slightly blown-out. I will admit that Fuji does a great job of matching the look of their films, but I never liked their films very much and that Sony sensor is capable of so much better!

The lens seems to do well enough to be very versatile with nice bokeh for a zoom. Flare is bad in a couple of shots... until I notice they're at f/32 and f/22. Those are not apertures I'd ever use (other than to check for dust on the sensor ;-) ).

I second that, colours rendition? Yuck!

Link | Posted on May 29, 2017 at 18:52 UTC

Problem is video card will be a big issue problem. HIgher end of 1080 Ti still has issue problem with 4K gaming resolution that still falling well below 60 fps on most newer game with Dx12. Even still have problem in older game with Dx11. Video movie and graphic in gaming use a lot of video processing. 8K would just make 1080 Ti video card fail so easy even SLI.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2017 at 14:43 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony a9: more speed, less dynamic range (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

bclaff: For those who may be curious I have revised the estimated Photographic Dynamic Range (PDR) available at http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D5,Sony%20ILCE-7RM2,Sony%20ILCE-9(estimate)
Still looks like the A9 is on track for having about the same PDR as the A7RM2.

Yeah i agreed, the sample picture above the noise was not as severe as Nikon D5 in based ISO.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 13:01 UTC
On article Sony FE 12-24mm F4 G sample gallery (60 comments in total)
In reply to:

azinheira: My Fuji 10-24 With Xt-20 have better colors and contrast.

I was on Sony and not very happy.

azinheira, Adobe Camera RAW and Lightroom does not have proper support for camera colour profile yet, it is still not final production yet. Thats what they said in the text I read last night, not a final production yet.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 08:48 UTC
Total: 1306, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »