Absolutic

Hopefully it is great because their first af effort - 85 1.8 is very good and sharp - I had the Fuji version

OP here.   Since I started the thread, I moved on completely with the bird setup and now using Sony A7R4 and 200-600 Sony lens.    I had Nikon 200-500 but never ended up trying Fuji 100-400.    ...

kind of duplicate content?

I am thrilled IR is saved

@MikeRan I am curious too.

@Bobthearch, well at least some of the above can be deducted as business expenses, maybe?

so does it mean that average wedding photographer makes $56,000 a year minus expenses?

Maybe, but I know several people who use RP as a 2d or 3d body (lightweight, especially with 35RF) that actually produce very good quality images. Its low light ISO is better that that of EOS R. ...

@aftab, with AF, but with SAF or CAF, is the question :) The words "continuous shooting" and 'continuous autofocus' are very different. Just ask Olympic and Nikon that all advertise insane fps...

Question for Dpreview editors:
1) Can you clarify with Canon if 12/20fps is with continuous af, or just continuous shooting with fixed af at first shot;
2) Can you clarify with Canon if 12/20fps...

Having read plenty of these 'release' documents from various manufactures over the years, I wonder,  as it is not clear from the release, is 20fps and 12fps 'continuous shooting ' means 'continuous ...

It is not clear from the release, is 20fps and 12fps 'continuous shooting' means 'continuous autofocus' or does it mean 'continuous shooting' with focus/exposure fixed at first shot?

Twice what you indicated    It can it cost less than 1dx’3 as it outspecs it in many ways

A9II?  You are kidding.    This outspecs Canon's 1DXMark3.   1DXMark 3 costs $6500.   This adds IBIS,  8K VIDEO and twice the Megapixels.   This will cost at least $10,000

gonna go home and download. Hoping Lightroom finally included camera profiles for Canon cameras like RP.

1) finally a large capacity battery
2) articulating display
3) IBIS

i wish Fuji could somehow fit 23/1.4 lens in that line instead of 2.0. It would make it more attractive to me as a take anywhere at night camera.

More images from my latest trip with Iphone 11 Max are here https://www.flickr.com/photos/absolutic/albums/72157712761989906

OP here Yes I now have xt30 (have also owned xt3 at one point) and it is a fact that xt2/20 is less noisy at ISO’s above 1600 than xt3/30. Of course the main key to these or any concert type low ...

Did not know that either.   That's good to know because I clearly don't use Scene Mode and I am sure some of the other Mode Dial settings.