JNo

hi, if possible try the sigma 100-400 before buying. sample variation is high. if weight and slower af is no problem then consider the nikon 200-500. maybe look for a used one on eg mbp. iq is very ...

got mine just before christmas in a camera store

yes i returned the lens. but i did more tests before: 1/400 with and without os and higher iso since the light was flat at first. also tested it at subjects at 20m distance. i had a good start and ...

no the old one. the dg dn is only available for e and l mount

so maybe i just had a bad copy.

i did other tests before like disableing os and shooting faster than 1/400 or using mf only or pin point af. btw camera was in manual. happy new year to you, too!:-)

body is a z 7 II. focus was checked manually. sigma lens was new. no shooting through glas. time between shots maybe 1 minute. no visable atmospherics to the naked eye and  i did a test also at ...

did a test against the nikon 200-500. setup: tripod, 2 sec timer, vr off distance to target apr. 100m left sigma, right nikon the sigma is too soft for me.

i may have the chance to test it tomorrow and will report

thank you for your response. any issues with flare/glare? how good is vr with ibis?

i had the sigma 100-400 dg dn for e mount via tze-01. very very sharp, but unfortunately it stopped working after the last fw update and techart didn't fix it until today (sold it). i also had the ...

on my wishlist: - bkt-mode: full sequence with just pressing the shutter once - focus-stacking: set start, set end, set f -->calculated #steps - blinkies - brighter frame around af-point - ...

tried it but doesn't work

fw 4.4.0 does not work with the z 7II with fw 1.30 and the sigma 100-400 dg dn. you will get the error message f---

Techart website says: Due to recent global electronic component shortage, we have changed to use another chip for this adapter and so the product code for the adapters with the new chips will be ...

i like the series and especially "hangover"