goldiethedog

'Typical for Sony lenses in this price range.' Well that statement kinds of wraps up why i feel the need for a better 28mm. As i say, my 35 and 24 lenses dont do this.

my 24 doesnt do this and neither do my 35mm lenses.

Sample cropped in image from 28mm f2.

Good point.

Thanks for mansplaining what you think i need. ' in most cases, you're not shooting at the widest aperture anyway' - well maybe i would close a 1.4 down a little to give more sharpness at f2 than ...

THE ONLY TRUTH TO ALL THIS is that none of the major 3 canon/nikon/sony offer a decent 28mm prime.

Does it still lock up the Sony camera on AF-C? THAT IS THE BIG QUESTION!

Is it so weird that Leica dedicate a fixed focal length full frame camera to 28mm?

I dont find it strange, i mean sure if you are shooting landscape and move between 28 and 35 then you cry the difference is indeed minimal. Shoot 35 and 28 amongst people and the difference is far ...

Its very large and i have tried it already. It's designed for DSLR and not mirrorless.

The Sony 28mm f2 just isnt that great at all. I cant be the only one thats been praying for a 28 GM for the past few years?! Even a 28mm 1.8 from samyang or sigma would be awesome.....

This review shows images taken by Philip Reeve using the TTArtisan M 50mm 1.4

Can we confirm this is the same lens as the TTArtisan 50mm F1.4 ASPH Full Fame Lens for Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon R,...

40mm is so not 50mm at all.

This review shows images taken by Philip Reeve using the TTArtisan M 50mm 1.4

Can we confirm this is the same lens as the TTArtisan 50mm F1.4 ASPH Full Fame Lens for Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon R,...

So is this the same lens as the TTArtisan M 50mm 1.4?

On the M cameras would a vintage Canon RF wide angle lens perform the same as a Leica RF wide angle from the same era in terms of corner smearing?

Nikon are silly. A full frame retro would have been way more popular for the vintage lens brigade. The most retro we have is the original Sony A7.