Claus-HL

...you just have to find an excuse to buy a new toy ;-) And... the Z7's AF isn't that bad either.

No

... this site is not only very anti-Nikon biased. The methodology and execution of the tests leave a lot to be desired (to put it kindly). It's best to forget the site

... here as it shows very well how much better the Z 20mm is: https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-z-20mm-f1-8-s/3

... for comparing the 35mm lenses: https://phillipreeve.net/blog/comparison-the-battle-of-35s-nikon-z-vs-sigma-vs-tamron-vs-zeiss-vs-pergear-vs-nikon-ai-s/

... your photos are very good. I'm sure you will be happy with Sony.

A bit too heavy editing here. I like the moon from the TO more.

I have this lens for 2 years on the Z7. It's the second copy because the first was decentered with soft edges. This copy is a joy to use. Sharp in the center and the borders @ f/2.8 and the outer ...

Did I understand something wrong here ?? The Z 24-70mm is 500g The Z 24-120 /4,0 is 630g. My math says it's only a bit over 25% heavier.

Thanks, I really appreciated your work. For me the Z 24-120mm on my Z7 is a VERY good allrounder and there are only few occasions when I need a fixed focal length. Even landscapes made with this ...

I care very little about market share.
For me, what matters more is the performance of a camera.

Why do you photograph with Nikon where the others - at least in your opinion - should be so much better.

... defocus control and at a price point of 3000 Euro (at least in Germany).

1000 bucks for a mobile phone... I don't get it.