Alexis D

This 100-400mm is not a PRO lens but it is supposed to be followed by another 150-400mm f/4.5 PRO. Not sure when it will arrive though, if ever. There is a nice comparison in mirrorless comparisons ...

I see. That must be why I got only 32 Thumbs-up for my comment. ;-) :-)

Size doesn't matter.  Just remove the video feature.  Problem solved.

How many people regularly shoot over 400mm? And of those who do, how many would buy Olympus and continue to do so? Would there be enough of them to keep Olympus alive? I have never seen such...

Now, lets be reasonable. I think it still has much better than zero chance as an entry level camera, esp packaged in a cheap kit. I only said it is not so interesting, since you would expect it to ...

You know that Sigma made some of those Spiratone lenses? In fact, Sigma was well known for making very ordinary lenses in the 60s and 70s, and even in the 80s whether using the Sigma label or...

You should be very happy it got 83%. Built with an old sensor and the old EVF, uncompetitive AF, and a price higher than some larger and more capable models from other brands, DPR has been more...

The main change seems to be the 20MP sensor.  Lets hope it has some other worthwhile features passed down from the higher models.  Otherwise it is not all that interesting.

Sorry to say this, but people will compare it to FF cameras that cost about the same or less money. Ultimately, for most people, it is about how much camera you get per $, or how much image quality ...

It can be used for street photography, for sure, but it is not all that good with a FAS. With a M43 sized 16MP sensor, its main advantage for this type of shooting is the lightweight body. A high ...

E-M10 III has a 16MP sensor with a performance essentially the same as the 8 year old E-M5. It is just cheap or good value for those who want a basement ilc camera.

It could be 50 or 60%. The experiment failed when people found it had a FAS.

Wow, this is fantastic and so amazing, that Apple will have this periscope, finally, in 2022, after 5 years.

It's the same with Canon, absolutely amazing, when it finally got a competitive sensor,...

That's true for the original E-M5 Mk I and the E-M1 Mk I, but not after those models. The smaller M43 cameras were not given the best new sensors and new features that can help stills ...

Leica get it. Fuji get it. Olympus, with all its history and nostalgic camera bodies, should, but didn't. There is a reason why cameras like the X100 can be popular, even with their limitations in ...

But you don't need top pro lenses in the Z line to beat top M43 lenses like those f/1.2 lenses. A cheaper f/1.8 FF lens on the Z5 will be more than sufficient to do that, and get better images.

I don't mind if Nikon remove all video functions. It will be worthwhile if that can make the camera $50 cheaper.

Obviously not.  There's no way to go. If it has not sunk in yet, just think what these new $1400 FF cameras will do to M43, especially to high-end Olympus products, even if we can ignore the effect ...

Olympus is trying its best to keep current users and others interested, so that it can make what it wants to get rid of attractive enough to NewCo. It does not want the JIP deal to fall through. ...

Wish he could say- The transfer is guaranteed for at least 2021. honored by whom?  Olympus, JIP or NewCo, but does this announcement by Olympus mean a legal commitment or obligation by the NewCo? W ...