Alexis D

My guess is that any beneficial AI know-how flowing back for use in MFT cameras will take time, as OMDS will be distracted and spending some of its limited resources on this project.   This is ...

See the change of the title above. Is it OK now? Seems to me, that some are missing some criteria in my original post. The reason I chose the E-M5 III is because it has a unique combination for ...

I see and I agree with you.  I was talking about how smaller and more affordable lenses, or lenses more suitable and reasonable in terms of size, weight, and performance for the Micro Four Thirds ...

Not too sure what you mean.  Those Olympus lenses can take photos with a FOV of 84°.  Are you saying that because it has 14 bit and it's FF, the A7c can take photos with the same FOV using a ...

Nice for you to be able to split the load with the wife.  You must teach me how to get the wife involved. ;-)

Just sharing what I found. For casual shoots, walk about or travels, either of these should be fine. (1) E-M5 III + 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 625g WR (2) E-M5 III + 14-150mm ...

I think you got enough good advice already.  I suggest trying with a toy cat or stuffed toy and paying PARTICULAR attention to focus accuracy and handshake.   Use a tripod and use manual focus for ...

But how can you show off your MFT?

The point is that this is trivial software now, and not news or that big a deal now if it's not implemented on a Leica.

I have been doing perspective correction on my phone photos for a long time.

And why is tethering not available on the E-M5 III?  I suppose it's because at the time the E-M5 III was due, there were still plenty of stock of the E-M1 II that Olympus wanted to sell.   They ...

Hopefully, JIP won't use so many hyphens in naming their product lines or models. OM-D E-M1 is just crazy, confusing and hard to pronounce and standardise. It would nice to maintain some ...

Very impressive for a $999 camera. 👏👏👏 Ticks all the important boxes. Would have been just perfect for a small iLC, and I would pay more, if it also had these (all minor):

- WR
- bigger...

Hmm... 72mm when used on a MFT camera, OK. I wonder whether it's worth the weight or dollars for M43 still photographers, when compared to the Olympus 75mm f/1.8.

"still cheaper" than others does not mean that the lens will be sold in sufficient number to be profitable. There are good reasons why pros buy more expensive lenses of other brands and not rush ...

There are definitely a lot of glorious history and products to write about, after 80+ years.

I suspect this may have to do with negotiations like the valuation of the stock, how much it is worth to JIP or the terms for JIP to take it over. It does not look good and it seem Olympus wants ...

And we can trust Olympus?

This sold and shipped by Amazon.  The price is lower than that of the body alone. https://www.amazon.com.au/OM-D-14-150-Black-Mark-III/dp/B07XYNW4P7/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=e-m5+iii&qid=160152 ...

Problem is - Can you believe everything they say?