MIKE1111

i like the p40

https://www.cameralabs.com/tamron-sp-70-210mm-f4-vc-review/2/ reviews both lenses

70-210 f4 is a sharper lens

use Tap-In console. I have 18-400 lens and it took a lot of adjustment. its worth the time.

I thought I read that, because of the short distance between lens an sensor that nikon gave more room for ibis to work. ibis usually has a 280mm-300mm limit. maybe nikon can go beyond this.

yes use tap in console. 80 feet is good for infinity setting. there still 2 more distance to set for each focal length. still may have to tweak setting more after. It takes a while . don't worry ...

not the camera for you then. lightweight full frame camera is great for carrying around all day. One persons toy is another persons gem. One persons substantial camera is another persons lead weight.

I think the camera to buy will be 3rd gen.

I have tamron 150-600 G2 and 300f4 PF .using d7500 for wildlife looking at buying 70-200 f2.8 and a full frame body for night time motorsports like 24 hr daytona. it all depends on if there's an ...

and you added to it. good one

I prefer mirrorless, because of the video AF , seeing the exposure through VF and no micro af adjust . One camera for stills and video. How long will it take nikon to have Z mount 24-120 f4, 70-200 ...

S lenses only work on Z mount. F mount works on Z and F. F mount is more versatile and its going to be a long time for the z mount lenses to be filled out.

5.5 fps live view is the limitation I would be concerned with.

nice

northrups are canon reps

Thanks. my lens took a lot of adjustments with Tap In console. set all focal lengths I could. it took every bit of the  -20 to +20 settings. also the af got better after adjustment

black car went off track and flew over the rumble strips coming back on. my skill level isn't to the point where I can pick the optimal focus point of a car going 200 mph, but maybe someday.

portland grand prix

yes

yes