atamola

Joined on Mar 3, 2012

Comments

Total: 68, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Samyang announces VDSLR 16MM T2.6 cine lens (18 comments in total)

I had the 35mm f/1.4. Excellent lens.
Only reason I had to sell it was that I prefer autofocus lenses -but, optically, is a magnificent lens.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2017 at 23:12 UTC as 2nd comment

Go to see the whole gallery... some really good pictures there.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 18:57 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Nick Brundle - Photography: They're nice photo's but even better if you could see the bride's wedding gown in full length in photo's 1, 4 & 9.
Shame they chopped the legs off in the pictures.

I also like 1 and 4 (9 not so much).

I'm not sure those photos would still work if they were full length.

If you put all the pictures of those particular weddings in one photobook then they make a lot more sense.

I guess what I'm saying is that the entire wedding matters when considering individual wedding pictures.

But still is a matter of different taste and opinions

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 18:52 UTC

1, 2, and 4 are very good.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 18:48 UTC as 16th comment

When you really have no intelligent negative points to raise you end up saying things like:

"Controls can be overwhelming" (OM-D E-M1 Mark II)
"User experience can be overwhelming" (PEN-F)
"Crop factor limits lens choices when capturing 4K video" (D500)

The last one is remarkable: they are reviewing cropped sensor cameras (!) and Nikon has a selection of lenses that only canon can rival (!!).

Jeez...

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 18:07 UTC as 85th comment | 3 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: Nikon D40 (176 comments in total)

Superb camera. Excellent image quality. Responsive. Very simple to use. 1/500 sync speed.

Coupled with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G DX produces images nothing short of spectacular.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2016 at 14:37 UTC as 73rd comment
On article YI M1 Sample Gallery (137 comments in total)

Look at pictures 4 and 5.

Those are a great example of why the photographer matters -and the camera not so much.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2016 at 15:05 UTC as 38th comment

X-trans is the one thing that kept me from upgrading from the X100 to the X100T.

If the next iteration of the X100 series uses a traditional sensor and adds all the film simulations so far, I will have to enter negotiations with my wife (again).

Note: for a lot of people X-trans tops bayer. I understand that. Just not for me.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 16:52 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

DoubleDash: Kodak and Polaroid. Very true. IPhone one #1, ridonculous.

The fact that a computer is not on #1 is just shamefull.

It's hard to argue that photography -embodied in some particular form- should be on the list. We can discuss if it should be those cameras or some other. But the absurdity of Time's list borders outright stupidity.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 16:52 UTC

Any moment now Leica will launch a M-ND (Typ 263) without a sensor.

Only for the purist.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 19:43 UTC as 266th comment
In reply to:

atamola: This is funny:

I've just asked a representative (chat, Nikon USA) what EVF would work with the DL24-85

This is the answer "We do not have that information as of yet. Check back periodically"

thanks

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 21:47 UTC
In reply to:

atamola: This is funny:

I've just asked a representative (chat, Nikon USA) what EVF would work with the DL24-85

This is the answer "We do not have that information as of yet. Check back periodically"

Will it work with the viewfinder of the V3?

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 17:58 UTC

This is funny:

I've just asked a representative (chat, Nikon USA) what EVF would work with the DL24-85

This is the answer "We do not have that information as of yet. Check back periodically"

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 16:54 UTC as 88th comment | 4 replies

Please, make it for Nikon -that way I wouldn't have to lose all that money selling Nikon lenses

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 16:22 UTC as 25th comment

Thank you, Sigma.

Thank you.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 19:10 UTC as 112th comment

This image tells a story with very strong emotion. Impressive.

PS: To all those whining about resolution, linear resolution, sharpness, corner sharpness, blah, blah, blah. this photo screams "f**k all that s***t!"

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 20:26 UTC as 52nd comment | 3 replies

This gallery shows how an excellent camera and superb lens are useless without a photographer.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 15:34 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies

I don't see a "retro-fad" or hipster design.

I see a well-thought lay-out with attention to aesthetics. Same with Fuji -specially the X100/S/T and X-T10

In particular for this camera, specs are quite good. Coupled with the excellent lenses, the system is excellent.

(Nikon, Fuji, Olympus, and Voigtländer user)

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 13:49 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply

The film simulations are excellent -not so much for the way they resemble the original film types but for the balanced and distinctive color and character.

I particularly like the rendition of 19 and 23.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 06:56 UTC as 33rd comment
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: I shot some 4K UHD videos of the moon with my Samsung NX1 the past week with 920mm F9 and 1480mm F6.3 scopes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5qdZmTZVBY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bj1n5HArrQI

screenshots :
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/494/19135580685_2b5f3436a7_o.png
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/516/19276653882_425f59c477_o.png

Nice.

Looks like a scene from a science fiction movie.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 16:27 UTC
Total: 68, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »