|
R. Scott Sherman
Lives in
Seacoast, NH, United States
Works as a
LPG Importer
Has a website at
www.rscottsherman.com
Joined on
Jul 2, 2003
|
Comments
 |  |  |
| Carla... by lickity split from Beautiful caucasian female faces | Lunar New Year Fireworks by Michael L NYC 99 from FIREWORKS | Vatican Basilica by wam7 from Street lights |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
2463FeatureWhat is equivalence?
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.
Have fun with your overpriced Lumpus.
razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.
I have the Olympus EM-1 and EM-5 II. But I also purchased the FF Pentax K-1. Which is weather sealed. Has IBIS. And is $150 less than this. I guess if you live in Beverly Hills the EM-1 Mark II is for you.
Mike99999: Photography FAIL of the century.
It's not trolling if you're an Olympus user.
t.c. marino: forgot to mention the 36mp pentax k1 ff is less expensive...see my previous post below
The Pentax K-1 also has IBIS and is weather sealed. I have both the Pentax and the EM-1 and EM-5 II. But the price for this new EM-1 II is outrageous. I'm contemplating the Fuji XT-2 for a mirrorless system.
razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.
The EM-1 was released at $1399.00. $600 less than the EM-1 Mark II. This is outrageously expensive for a micro 4/3rds camera.
And then came along the Pentax K-1....
cirtapfotos: The Winner...Again Nikon D810 at 64 ISO can't be beat.
Have fun with your overpriced, antiquated D810.
Most certainly not an easy camera to buy right now....
Chomping at the bit to see the new Pentax K-1's test results.
Being an Olympus Micro 4/3rds user. This looks like an excellent landscape and astrophotography camera. Will be interesting to see the ISO tests when it is released.
dprived prev: a dedicated loyal Pentaxian for decades here:
fine, i do love this camera for a number of very good reasons.
and i don't really care it doesn't include IBIS for video anymore. (although i'm sure it'll certainly do that later when K-1II will come out in a year or two at the most.)
but at least two things about this camera are making me feel not so happy about it:
look below in the next comment please.
That "gimmicky" LCD screen looks to be tough as nails. Check out into 1:50 of this video.....http://bit.ly/1TCYHEt
R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!
@Teila Day. You need to get a life along with a new camera.
R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!
I look forward to seeing what Thom Hogan has to say about the Pentax K-1.
R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!
Nikons are overpriced boat anchors.
This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!
matthew saville: Man, combine this little but rock-solid workhorse with the "known" success of the Tamron-Pentax 15-30 2.8, and I think we have a new astro-landscape champion on our hands. This kit'll give a D810A + 14-24 2.8 quite a run for its money!
I don't see the Tamron 15-30/Pentax mount either on B&H or Amazon. Do they still make it?
Adam Woodworth is so good. Such an inspirational photographer he is.
Thermidor: I'm seriously considering the D610 and Sony A7 which is much more in my price range, but I'm curious to know how much better the D750 is if you ignore the tilting LCD screen and wi-fi (which are nice to have, but not a must-have). The biggest draw for me is the one stop higher ISO performance, but is there anything else that stands out? I'm quite inclined to the D610 because it has a silent shutter option, which helps a lot with the stage shooting I normally do. I don't need to track very complicated subjects, and more often than not, I'll focus and recompose from the central AF point, so I don't need a highly sophisticated AF system, just good metering and high ISO performance.
If you shoot RAW the D610 is a no brainer purchase over the D750. Take the $800 savings and put it towards a nice lens.
Stitzer23: This d750 makes the d610 look good!
The D610 is $800 cheaper. That's why it looks good.
blink667: Curious about the coming competition between the D750 and Sony A7II which has in-body stabilization and is $1000 cheaper with a 28-70mm.
Huh? The A7II with the 28-70mm is $300 less than the D750. http://bhpho.to/12oXZmf