R. Scott Sherman

R. Scott Sherman

Lives in United States Seacoast, NH, United States
Works as a LPG Importer
Has a website at www.rscottsherman.com
Joined on Jul 2, 2003

Comments

Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.

Have fun with your overpriced Lumpus.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 14:43 UTC
In reply to:

razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.

I have the Olympus EM-1 and EM-5 II. But I also purchased the FF Pentax K-1. Which is weather sealed. Has IBIS. And is $150 less than this. I guess if you live in Beverly Hills the EM-1 Mark II is for you.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:40 UTC
In reply to:

Mike99999: Photography FAIL of the century.

It's not trolling if you're an Olympus user.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:34 UTC
In reply to:

t.c. marino: forgot to mention the 36mp pentax k1 ff is less expensive...see my previous post below

The Pentax K-1 also has IBIS and is weather sealed. I have both the Pentax and the EM-1 and EM-5 II. But the price for this new EM-1 II is outrageous. I'm contemplating the Fuji XT-2 for a mirrorless system.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:32 UTC
In reply to:

razadaz: It's ironic how people complain about the price. When I bought my Original OM1 many many years ago it cost more than this in real terms.

The EM-1 was released at $1399.00. $600 less than the EM-1 Mark II. This is outrageously expensive for a micro 4/3rds camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:18 UTC
On article Benchmark performance: Nikon D810 in-depth review (255 comments in total)

And then came along the Pentax K-1....

Link | Posted on May 12, 2016 at 17:50 UTC as 82nd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

cirtapfotos: The Winner...Again Nikon D810 at 64 ISO can't be beat.

Have fun with your overpriced, antiquated D810.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2016 at 15:11 UTC

Most certainly not an easy camera to buy right now....

Link | Posted on May 5, 2016 at 20:48 UTC as 144th comment

Chomping at the bit to see the new Pentax K-1's test results.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 00:22 UTC as 157th comment | 1 reply
On article UPDATED: CP+ 2016: shooting the Pentax K-1 in Yokohama (378 comments in total)

Being an Olympus Micro 4/3rds user. This looks like an excellent landscape and astrophotography camera. Will be interesting to see the ISO tests when it is released.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 13:57 UTC as 54th comment
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

dprived prev: a dedicated loyal Pentaxian for decades here:

fine, i do love this camera for a number of very good reasons.

and i don't really care it doesn't include IBIS for video anymore. (although i'm sure it'll certainly do that later when K-1II will come out in a year or two at the most.)

but at least two things about this camera are making me feel not so happy about it:

look below in the next comment please.

That "gimmicky" LCD screen looks to be tough as nails. Check out into 1:50 of this video.....http://bit.ly/1TCYHEt

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 14:26 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!

@Teila Day. You need to get a life along with a new camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 03:21 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!

I look forward to seeing what Thom Hogan has to say about the Pentax K-1.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2016 at 02:20 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)
In reply to:

R. Scott Sherman: This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!

Nikons are overpriced boat anchors.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 23:32 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)

This new Pentax blows away the antiquated, overpriced Nikons. Way to go Pentax!

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 23:06 UTC as 70th comment | 27 replies
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2660 comments in total)
In reply to:

matthew saville: Man, combine this little but rock-solid workhorse with the "known" success of the Tamron-Pentax 15-30 2.8, and I think we have a new astro-landscape champion on our hands. This kit'll give a D810A + 14-24 2.8 quite a run for its money!

I don't see the Tamron 15-30/Pentax mount either on B&H or Amazon. Do they still make it?

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 07:35 UTC
On article Starstruck: Adam Woodworth's nighttime photography (60 comments in total)

Adam Woodworth is so good. Such an inspirational photographer he is.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 15:02 UTC as 15th comment
On article Nikon D750 Review (2013 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thermidor: I'm seriously considering the D610 and Sony A7 which is much more in my price range, but I'm curious to know how much better the D750 is if you ignore the tilting LCD screen and wi-fi (which are nice to have, but not a must-have). The biggest draw for me is the one stop higher ISO performance, but is there anything else that stands out? I'm quite inclined to the D610 because it has a silent shutter option, which helps a lot with the stage shooting I normally do. I don't need to track very complicated subjects, and more often than not, I'll focus and recompose from the central AF point, so I don't need a highly sophisticated AF system, just good metering and high ISO performance.

If you shoot RAW the D610 is a no brainer purchase over the D750. Take the $800 savings and put it towards a nice lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 15:00 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (2013 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stitzer23: This d750 makes the d610 look good!

The D610 is $800 cheaper. That's why it looks good.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 14:57 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (2013 comments in total)
In reply to:

blink667: Curious about the coming competition between the D750 and Sony A7II which has in-body stabilization and is $1000 cheaper with a 28-70mm.

Huh? The A7II with the 28-70mm is $300 less than the D750. http://bhpho.to/12oXZmf

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 14:56 UTC
Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »