mgblack74

mgblack74

Lives in Canada Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Has a website at www.mikeblackphotoworks.com
Joined on Oct 31, 2007

Comments

Total: 226, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

So many people wishing for the death of a North American company and then wondering why there are no jobs. Apple was in worse condition in 1999. Now look. Secretaries with stock options are gazillionaires now. Sometimes you have to take a step back to take two steps forward. But yes, GoPro products are expensive compared to the Chinese competitors, but the Chinese competitors have near zero marketing dollars compared to GoPro, so they can get away far less prices. (Somebody has to pay for action sport athlete sponsorships etc. It's not GoPro, its the consumer). I had a couple of GoPros but sold my last one off after not having used it in a year. But they do make for great surf and turf family vacation cams.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 03:59 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon reportedly eliminating 1000 jobs in Japan (535 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mariano Pacifico: That is right, Nikon should eliminate 1,000 jobs. They are so behind the curve. They lost their race in digital format with Canon. They even blame Fukushima earthquake for failing to produce Nikon DL premium cameras. What is funny it is still in their website.

Whatever you're smoking must be really potent.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 15:49 UTC
On article Nikon reportedly eliminating 1000 jobs in Japan (535 comments in total)

Hey @dpreview, Nikon has come out to flattly deny this report. You should update your post.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 04:03 UTC as 130th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

peeyaj: Why it is slow at F4?

At 19mm there isn't a big difference or benefit to be 2.8. Size and cost would be much more. But as far as DOF etc, this is not the lens for that. As a technical lens, you can make f/8 look like 1.8, or f/4 look like f/16. And for light gathering ability, again, this is most likely to be used on a tripod under controled situations or at least in situations where there is plenty of light to be able to focus, and then you don't need to bother with again.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 04:51 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: Does Nikon upgrade this lens every couple of years?

Mmmm, 7 years since the 70-200VRII. And there were 10 years between 70-200 VRI & II. This is a flaghship lens for Nikon. It typically has the best of current tech in it. And I speculate that the E designation for electromagnetic diaphragm is really a cover for compatible operability with some upcoming mirrorless camera.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 04:32 UTC

Fantastic lens. Finally caught up with the independant tilting and shifting. Price, not so much. But if you need it, you need it and will probably pay for itself quickly. Bravo Nikon!

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 04:26 UTC as 41st comment
On article UPDATED: Sony RX100 Mark V real-world samples (277 comments in total)
In reply to:

JT26: Not sure how much better this camera is than the MK IV but the images are superb. £1000 is a steep sum. Seems to go up £150-200 every year. So in 10 years the MK 15 will be £3000?

By then, 20 mp FF sensors from 2015 will be in the cameras. :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2016 at 19:24 UTC
In reply to:

Marcos Villaroman: I wonder if Sony improved the length of time you can shoot 4K video before the camera overheats.

I also wonder if Sony improved the cameras connectivity for use as 4K video.

4K video on my RX100 M4 really wasn't implemented that well. It was also disappointing that the M4 didn't support snapping a still image while recording 4K video.

OTOH, I do appreciate that Sony has kept the form factor relatively the same as the earlier cameras. That water proof enclosure that's backward compatible with my RX100 M4 looks interesting for beach/pool use. Should also mean that the more expensive 3rd party enclosures suitable for diving would also work.

Oh how spoiled we've become. Lol. I mean no harm. I bought my first DSLR in 2006 and all it did was take pictures. Now we can take 4K video underwater and put the camera in our pocket. Good times.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 15:40 UTC
In reply to:

Sonyshine: Imagine that sensor in the new Nikon V4....or J6....or DL....

Maybe they'll never release the DL and just go to the DL"S" lol. Utilizing this chip of course.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 14:31 UTC

So can dpreview add a MF forum so we can chat about this? ;-)

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2016 at 14:22 UTC as 108th comment
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

otto k: Is there a point in specifying weight in both oz and lb, but not in kg for the rest of us?

My 3.6 litre engine produces 265 "horse power" and 261 lbs/ft of torque. Lol. Mixing metric with imperial with farm animals. European engine specs, while quantifiably more accurate, get lost on us North Americans.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 20:45 UTC
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

otto k: Is there a point in specifying weight in both oz and lb, but not in kg for the rest of us?

We Canadians are metric too, but are used to translating units of measure that our imperialist Americans friends use. We measure distance, speed, liquid volume etc metrically, but informally we use lbs and feet/inches for height and weight. It's good to be bilingual :-). Why the freezing point of water is a seemingly arbitraty "32" F is puzzling. 0 Celcius makes more sense. Actually, Kelvin makes the most sense.... especially for photographers who think colour temps in Kelvin.

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2016 at 15:33 UTC
In reply to:

Saurat: Total cost under $10,000? For the body and selection of lenses or body only? Fuji are not generally known for inexpensive kit.

Body, 63mm f/2.8 lens, and EVF. That's a pretty good deal I think. Hasselblad's X1D is $8999 body only.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 14:10 UTC
On article Hands-on with Nikon's latest kit at Photokina (130 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: Super yawn zzzZZZZZZZ, I shoot Nikon but what is this company doing?

I have a feeling, and a vague inside scoop, that they were going to announce something big. But something must have happened and didn't want to do a DL fiasco again. That said, Fuji likely would have still won Photokina 2016.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 03:39 UTC
On article Hands-on with Nikon's latest kit at Photokina (130 comments in total)
In reply to:

Joed700: The 105mm f/1.4E looks promising. If it's sharp wide open like the 85mm f/1.4g, it's definitely a lens on my collection list.

I have it and the 85. It's sharper wide open and less purple fringing. It's amazing.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 03:37 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands on with Sigma's latest lenses (82 comments in total)

12-24 is almost 2 1/2 lbs. That's a bigga boyah!

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 14:55 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

nathanleebush: Question: why were they able to make rangefinders as small and thin as the M7-II but this has a giant bulge in the back? Just curious. I'm sure there's a good reason.

I'm assuming you mean the Mamiya 7II? Well. First, it was film and the Fuji is digital. Film is the capture AND storage medium. Digital has a sensor, a host of electronics that are slightly above my educational background in understading, and memory cards. Batteries are masssive in what they must power where as a M7II had button cell type batteries to power the meter. Just the meter. Everything else; frame advance, shutter speed etc, was mechanical. Digial MF is far, far more complex than film.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 14:52 UTC
In reply to:

mosc: 1) I would love to see a size comparison to the Hasselblad X1D
2) The Hsselblad has a shutter in lens system correct? The Fuji will lose some fashion-shooting-crazy-flash-sync people there.
3) Can DPR take a good look at the lens mount dimensions? Is this going to fit larger format sensors or is this purposely built for the "crop MF" 44x33mm sensor it's shipping with?
4) Seems very conventional and comparable to a 5D/800 type camera physically. I wonder how much more it will cost. If it's not much more and the intended user isn't much for sports anyway, they might go Fuji.
5) Surprising they didn't go X-Trans on the color filter to further differentiate themselves...

If they were priced the same, I'd opt for the Hasselblad. Simply because of the sync speed and it has a Nikon hotshoe. (As a Nikon user and potentially dual system user, I can't tell you how invaluable this would be).

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 13:47 UTC

85 Art has a front filter thread of 86mm. Its huge! the Nikon 105 1.4 and Tamron 24-70 VC is "only" 82mm.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 18:55 UTC as 60th comment

@dpreview.... I think it's time to have a medium format forum here.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:45 UTC as 64th comment
Total: 226, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »