Hoxton Bridge

Hardly the same thing. You may think of public photography as potentially rude, but it would be stretch of even the most austere civil codes to compare it to something that is disgusting and ...

Fair enough, I wouldn't quibble with that...

I'm not sure what the beef is here. If someone is happy with an iPhone 11 Pro (or any other high-end phone) for their photography, then fill your boots. You will be saving yourselves potentially ...

Unless that's (wide-angle hi-def) what is on my MacBook Pro I don't have it - assuming I don't, it doesn't seem to prevent getting anything done...

I'm glad that works for you, but it does seem to be contrary to the way most business is being carried out. I have yet to hear anyone suggest an audio-only meeting. For me, I like to see the body...

Well, I agree that Fuji makes some very good glass, and indeed their cameras are extremely good with excellent image quality and high dynamic range. I'm intrigued where your idea that the sensor...

I agree with @Kandid. However, it may be that Sony cameras are, amongst other things, less than ergonomic, have lousy menu systems, and a (relative) lack of quality glass. Perhaps Marksphoto...

They aren't clueless, they aren't interested...

I winced at Sharp £4000 and switched off at the micro four-thirds sensor line.

Oh, brother, why are you here if it is so bad? And, by your comments, you have been here for some time. Quite bizarre really.

Thanks, happy...

The same reason that I own a (very expensive) turntable and would rather eat nails than listen to music on an iPhone or through Spotify and Sonos. Either way, if it doesn't float your boat, it's...

That's a very silly comment.

Not yet, but if cameras begin to act like mobile devices, you may not be able to function without being 'online', or connected to something.

The autofocus ones...

@LevAizik Ah yes the Sony A7III with the worst viewfinder in its class, and the Z6, which despite being a good camera is dependent on a thin supply of overpriced native lenses, and only with a...

Soon, somebody will release a phone without the phone bit, just a camera and a large screen with lots of apps. I wonder what they will call it?

I don't particularly want either, but that is a bit of a silly comparison...

Wow, that is some epic fail there fella.

Well no, not really. You, however, can fill your boots.