Dré de Man

+ 11111 to em photo's words: <<< Speak for yourself: we aren't in the dark. Nikon isn't, either. Nikon has worked a consistent product line with a remarkably predictable roadmap and timeline, for 5 ...

Hi 100pk,
If you want to use ACR, it's better to install Bridge (it's free anyway, even without CC). That's the easiest way. You can tell Bridge to open in ACR within Photoshop or to open in ACR...

Reminds me of an old joke. A patient tells the doctor: when I hold my arm like this (holds his arm in an awkward position) it hurts. The doctor: well, you idiot, don't hold it like that!

Toshiba PR told me, compatibility is like 3 and 2, so it should be compatible.

Yes it's a pity and thnx for the link to the wbm. But who knows, maybe it will come back in another form, like in the Eyes of Nikon book ...

I really don't understand how anybody can say the 105/2.8 VR is 'so-so'. If you like the 105/2.5 you should love the 105/2.8. It's sharper and has a lovely bokeh. And it's not just me saying: http: ...

Well yes, of you want a fast and professional solution you need of course WT-5a/UT1. But since you were thinking of Eye-fi, there is also this: ...

s1rf4n (???? sounds like a name of android) wrote; << My wife uses one of these Nikon V3 cameras. There exists one decent prime lens for this system with the zoom lenses being pretty mediocre at...

You wrote: If both lenses have the same resolving power per millimeter the 50mm on the full frame body will produce an image with 1.5x higher effective (pixel) resolution. Not quite. You forgot one ...

I wish people would finally stop to believe the DxO nonsense . Of course a 24-70 (both versions and in fact almost any lens) will be sharper on a D810. The D750 is a fine camera with which you can ...

I used both extensively next to each other, mainly on the D500 for several weeks while I was testing them for a magzine and my books, so I think I’m able to compare very well. Both lenses surprised ...

P.S. And of course you have to stop down, nobody in his right mind makes landscapes wide open when edge sharpness is important. But the point is that many lenses are not sharp in the corners no ...

you wrote: All the concern about edge sharpness is crazy anyway. . . How often is there anything of importance at the very edge of an image? Even off-center subjects don't extend to the very edge. ...

With landscape and city scape pictures, 90% of the time!

Of course you have to stop it down to approx. f/6.3, there is no full frame super wide angle zoom in the world that is sharp in the edges at f/2.8, not even a prime. Oh and I used at least three ...

Yes there is and that's the reason why almost all internet test are flawed, because they test at a distance of between 25x and 50x focal length. For a wide angle or a standard zoom that is ...

I"m with Marianne here, looks really bad. I've used this lens for years, even some time on FX, so I know it should do much better. I hope you can go back to the seller.

The 14-24 just doesn't live up to 36mp really??? Nonsense. Resolution reaches the maximum lp/mm of the 36 MP sensor at high contrast from f/6.3 in all focal lengths  to in the extreme corners. A ...

I don't know what they do there at DxO, but I'm afraid they don't know either. In every serious test, including my own,  the VR comes out better than the non VR. Only when you test at a very short ...

I really don't get this. I tested this lens for a week and not one millisecond I had a negative feeling about how it looked or felt. I was absolutely surprised about resolution and contrast and ...