Roger99

Lives in Australia Australia
Works as a Artist
Joined on Sep 27, 2004

Roger99's recent activity

  • Haven't come up against a troll here for a while.  I don't get what these guys get out of it myself.
  • You didn't originally recognize the tag BaconFat did you?  You have the same level of comprehension and the same sense of reasoning. So to you the only actual photography is that which is taken at ...
  • If they were good photographers chances are that that is what they would be doing rather than wasting time generating reviews. Look at it this way though. Odds are that they are hardware fanatics ...
  • But sadly, not well read and as a result mostly wrong.
  • Time exposures aren't altered images but simply the results of a broader point of view.  They are a realistic and unaltered representation of that which exists seen from a longer time frame.  If ...
  • There are certain sources such as National Geographic.  Aside from recent assertions of other controversial activities in the past there was the benefit of editorial policy that refused ...
  • ...Certainly there would be no decent reason to argue the idea of analog tech reviews and profiles on DPR but the fora are a different angle on it.  Photography isn't harmed in the discussion of ...
  • ...on very rare occasions when I have used other peoples cameras for them and for expedience used their settings.
  • Replied in Not surprised...
    While it was still working I regularly printed images from my old Canon G10 (14.7Mp) to cropped prints of about a meter wide which would have made it a little over a quarter of the area of a 5x7 ...
  • It's up to you what range you want to be working in and what noise levels you are willing to tolerate.  Just leave your camera on automatic ISO settings and what you will find is that your noise ...
  • You could say that about half of the postings on the site.  The original posting was in itself a product of an ill informed poster (filter size being in some way directly representative of lens ...
  • Not to forget the perennial favorite "aluminum". That still isn't correct anywhere (I blame illiterate American aluminium siding salesmen between the wars myself but I don't know that for certain) ...
  • Nah, you're just defining a successfully completed build wrong.  ( Besides 2+2=5. )
  • But it is flat ma'boy.  Just look out the window.
  • Here's a test for ya.  The last time I tried snapping ducks I put the camera down on a short tripod with a cable release and threw breadcrumbs in front of the camera with a wide angle lens ...
  • Two minds on this one.  I's kind of good to see that nothing ever really changes but I gotta wonder these things come back.  Then again it is no less valid to raise the dead than to constantly ...
  • Depends on how long something wrong has to be until it is right doesn't it?
  • I despise 4 3rds as a composition frame and always have it set to  square wastin' all them pixels, have absolutely no issue with 2:3 which worked nicely in 35mm film, like full control of the ...
  • We always new it and quoted it as the acronym for the "International Standards Organization".  No scramble needed.
  • I'd just be inclined to put a square or round cut tape piece in the center of the cap with a concave rear element (depressed lens) and in the case of a convex rear element (raised lens).  The ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Roger99 has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 3297
Threads started 29
Last post 3 hours ago
Total comments 1
Total likes 1
Last post 2 months ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0