NexLupus

@milkod2001
Reasoning with MILC is impossible...he is a Sony apologist and by extension anything that attaches to Sony.
There is no reasoning with him, even when you show him the facts or images to...

@Milc man
Wrong, they are not the same as the DSLR counterparts, they are bigger.
They are physically bigger, because they have the equivalent of the MC-11 adaptor attached at the end.

@MILC man
Is it the same optical design as all of the other Art Series...yes
Are the lenses the same size as if an MC-11 Sigma adaptor was attached...yes
So has an adaptor been attached and hard...

Yes they did...it is essentially the same flange distance as if you added the adapter, their is nothing different to the lens formulas that are specific to Mirrorless or take advantage of the...

@seahawk Yes the perfect place for someone that does not understand the basics about optics, Dynamic range and physics...

@MILC man
Your MILC has gone sour

Well, I would start with getting rid of your Tamron Lenses and getting Nikon 105 1.4E or Nikon 200 f/2. The quality of that shot is NOT due to the camera body or the EVF, like beatabox alluded ...

Along with Chiropractic visits.

Except the Nikon is considered to be a stellar lens at half the size and weight.
I rather pay a premium for OEM and a lens I can actually take with me on a trip.

@armandino
DPReview and all other reviews I have read all say the D5 is the most accurate focusing system.
In fact DPReview uses Nikon's focusing system as the litmus test by which all others are...

Im assuming you don't use anything other than the slower lenses, because if you use any of their pro lenses (24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 35 1.4, 85 1.4 etc), maneuverability, size and weight are out the ...

@Astrotripper
Bingo, and that is why you can't reason with the Sony apologists

Word

@MILC man
Nikon 1 had 20fps full read with continuous AF 3 years ago.
Of course, the Sony is FF, but again, nothing really new.

Again, poor reading comprehension...tsk, tsk.
I provided the evidence, you are choosing to ignore it, and are making straw man arguments against that evidence.
So no, educate yourself, apologist.

Do your own homework...
I supplied you with the evidence, if you don't want to accept it, then prove me wrong...I don't need to defend something that is widely known and accepted.

@randomguy
Wow, just wow.
When presented with something you don't like to hear you argue, when presented with the FACTS you argue and attack the facts.
Sony fanboys are true apologists.

@randomguy
I guess reading comprehension is not a Sony user forte.
I said same sensor, YOU showed different sensors, with different pixel counts.
I showed same sensor, and Nikon smoked the Sony...

@Astrotripper
you do realize that logic and facts don't work with Sony folks.
It amazes me how Sony users completely disregard known issues in their cameras (issues that if Nikon or Canon had, they...

@randomguy
Here is an accurate display of Nikon and Sony using similar sensor...