whtchocla7e

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Aug 22, 2010

Comments

Total: 265, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Unless the universal mount accepts my NX, E-mount, m43 and other lenses, it is not a universal mount.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2015 at 16:22 UTC as 43rd comment | 7 replies
On article Photo prodigy: The images of 17-year-old Taylor Gray (165 comments in total)

Great images. I would have to be really bitter to say otherwise.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 01:46 UTC as 25th comment

What a BEAST!! SONY :O

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2015 at 00:26 UTC as 55th comment
On article Massive $33,500 2450mm f/8 NASA lens surfaces on eBay (235 comments in total)

Santa Claus to little Johnny:
- Son, what do you want for Christmas?
- The 2450mm f/8, Santa
- No Johnny, that's what I want for Christmas!

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2015 at 11:36 UTC as 41st comment
On article Weird Science: Olympus BioScapes 2014 winners (21 comments in total)
In reply to:

faithblinded: Number 9 blows my mind.

I hope your mind is recovered after a day?

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2015 at 23:08 UTC

So basically pay full retail price for used equipment? Smart businessmen if they can pull it off.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 16:11 UTC as 10th comment
In reply to:

whtchocla7e: The point-and-shoots are alive and well.

The Nex 3/5, the small m4/3 cams from Oly and Panny, the Nikon 1, the Q from Pentax, the premium compacts from various manufacturers?

They're all point-and-shoots in disguise. They sell in mass quantities, the majority of the buyers never purchase an additional lenses or accessories.

Your casual photographer may now have a more capable camera with interchangeable lenses (and they may not even know it!) but the point-and-shoot mentality does not change.

The definition of a point-and-shoot should be more dynamic to reflect the current state of the (lower end) camera market.

If 499 out of 500 people use a Nikon D3100 as a point-and-shoot then I call Nikon D3100 a point-and-shoot. I redefine product category based on shooting style. That's my new 2014 way of thinking. Catch up :)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 11:58 UTC

The point-and-shoots are alive and well.

The Nex 3/5, the small m4/3 cams from Oly and Panny, the Nikon 1, the Q from Pentax, the premium compacts from various manufacturers?

They're all point-and-shoots in disguise. They sell in mass quantities, the majority of the buyers never purchase an additional lenses or accessories.

Your casual photographer may now have a more capable camera with interchangeable lenses (and they may not even know it!) but the point-and-shoot mentality does not change.

The definition of a point-and-shoot should be more dynamic to reflect the current state of the (lower end) camera market.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 10:57 UTC as 57th comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II beta image samples (36 comments in total)

Not bad for a DSLR.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 11:05 UTC as 6th comment

While this wide zoom is ok, I don't get the reasoning behind releasing the other slow zooms for these supposedly enthusiast cams...

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 16:42 UTC as 21st comment | 3 replies
On article Canon announces long-awaited EOS 7D Mark II (116 comments in total)

First Kodak, now Canon...

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 14:16 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On article Canon unveils PowerShot G7 X with 1"-type sensor (50 comments in total)

I guess I have to wait for PowerShot G7 X II to come with an EVF... For now, the RX100III remains the more attractive option.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 14:13 UTC as 12th comment
On article Sony adds XAVC S support to Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 (81 comments in total)

The A6000 will be replaced and forgotten in 6 months. Sony won't spend the money to update it.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2014 at 12:11 UTC as 16th comment
On article Fujifilm X30 First Impressions Review (476 comments in total)

2/3" sensor... Did you really listen to customer feedback now, Fuji?

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 11:21 UTC as 114th comment | 2 replies

I like shaky video. The hyperlapse footage looks unnatural.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2014 at 13:12 UTC as 34th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

chadley_chad: Remind me never to publish my work for all the 'DP CRITICS' to shred into a million pieces!

Ok

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2014 at 20:14 UTC

Expect a call from PETA...

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2014 at 18:20 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply

If the original image as stored on the memory card - after the monkey pressed the shutter - belongs to no one then Slater was free to edit the image and publish his version. His published version is his original work and he absolutely has the right to demand that Wikipedia takes it down.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2014 at 18:49 UTC as 197th comment | 1 reply

He should have not posted the photos on the internet. He traded his images for 5 minutes of fame. Like many of you do on a daily basis...

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2014 at 16:32 UTC as 204th comment | 1 reply

Interesting idea but the execution is too chaotic in some shots, not in a good way.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2014 at 02:15 UTC as 18th comment
Total: 265, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »