ZeBebito

ZeBebito

Lives in United States Austin, TX, United States
Works as a Philanthropist, world traveler, chef, bon Vivant
Joined on Jul 21, 2016
About me:

Enjoying life every day and taking pictures here and there.

Comments

Total: 2843, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

ZeBebito: What's the point of owning a Leica M body to pair with this kind of low-end glass? They could sell it like "character" for me is just junk.

The point was to mimic Hamilton’s soft focus style which was on fashion like 40 years ago.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2019 at 04:53 UTC

What's the point of owning a Leica M body to pair with this kind of low-end glass? They could sell it like "character" for me is just junk.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2019 at 01:16 UTC as 15th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Conrad567: $450 seems a bit steep for a lens that produces this kind of quality.

I think the IQ is terrible.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2019 at 01:15 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

nandbytes: how come only nikon lenses are getting their own reviews?

Nope. I used to have an amazing F3HP, and still intrigued by the ancient DF, maybe one day.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2019 at 00:40 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

nandbytes: how come only nikon lenses are getting their own reviews?

I am, not a Sony boy since I also have Leica, Canon, Hasselblad, and Rollei cameras. Oh, and a Lumix G1 in some drawer.

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2019 at 00:15 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

nandbytes: how come only nikon lenses are getting their own reviews?

@Barney I am talking about when he refers to Sony users as Sony ”fanboys”, with a series of remarks about their attitudes. I don’t have the specific article but we had a pretty heated discussion here a couple of months ago actually. Maybe Ozturert or some other fellow member brought that up.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 22:41 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

nandbytes: how come only nikon lenses are getting their own reviews?

I don't care about what he could say, especially after his remarks towards Sony users, not very professional for my taste. And yes, he could be a celebrity/legend/eminence/god of cameras but still acts like a troll.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 22:13 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

nandbytes: how come only nikon lenses are getting their own reviews?

Roger Cicala is the number one Anti-Sony troll. He hates Sony cameras, Sony lenses, and Sony users too lol.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 21:08 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: In the comparison tool, I think it's fair to say that Sony/Zeiss shots are OOF or the lens has an issue, otherwise it'd be weird that the new FE 35mm lens is better :)
It seems the new Nikon lens is almost on par with Canon and they are both better than FE 35mm. Zeiss seems to be the worst (I guess that is due to focusing problem).
Very good work by Nikon.

Mmmm I see... or maybe the Nikon is actually a 30mm?? who knows, Mr. Horshack needs a 3rd lens for control.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 21:03 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: In the comparison tool, I think it's fair to say that Sony/Zeiss shots are OOF or the lens has an issue, otherwise it'd be weird that the new FE 35mm lens is better :)
It seems the new Nikon lens is almost on par with Canon and they are both better than FE 35mm. Zeiss seems to be the worst (I guess that is due to focusing problem).
Very good work by Nikon.

The worst of the bunch is the Nikon, wide open is softer than the butter I put on my bagel this morning.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 18:41 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)

The Canon is the better lens and the cheaper and lighter too, no doubt about it. The Nikon at f1.8 is as soft as the Fuji X100 lens.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 18:06 UTC as 47th comment | 5 replies
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: In the comparison tool, I think it's fair to say that Sony/Zeiss shots are OOF or the lens has an issue, otherwise it'd be weird that the new FE 35mm lens is better :)
It seems the new Nikon lens is almost on par with Canon and they are both better than FE 35mm. Zeiss seems to be the worst (I guess that is due to focusing problem).
Very good work by Nikon.

They are talking about the new 35mm FF 1.8 and the Zeiss f1.4.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 18:02 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZeBebito: So now any lens under $1000 (like a nifty 50 for $600) is considered “affordable”.

Yes, my mint C/Y Zeiss 50mm f1.7 cost me $125 and it is pretty sharp.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 15:09 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: In the comparison tool, I think it's fair to say that Sony/Zeiss shots are OOF or the lens has an issue, otherwise it'd be weird that the new FE 35mm lens is better :)
It seems the new Nikon lens is almost on par with Canon and they are both better than FE 35mm. Zeiss seems to be the worst (I guess that is due to focusing problem).
Very good work by Nikon.

"...they are both better than FE 35mm"
Says who? have you seen real-world samples from different photographers using the FE lens or just making assumptions based on a DPR gallery?

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 15:06 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

eno2: A nice lens and all but overpriced!

No! By DPR standards is considered “affordable”.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 14:24 UTC
On article Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S Review (367 comments in total)

So now any lens under $1000 (like a nifty 50 for $600) is considered “affordable”.

Link | Posted on Aug 12, 2019 at 13:52 UTC as 70th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

ZeBebito: Shame there is no Fuji GFX mount.

Lol exactly

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2019 at 05:37 UTC

Shame there is no Fuji GFX mount.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2019 at 22:22 UTC as 56th comment | 3 replies
On article Blackmagic Design unveils the Pocket Cinema Camera 6K (333 comments in total)
In reply to:

DtBB: LOL!

Even Blackmagic knows that mFT is a walking dead format.

With Pana throwing its weight behind FF and the miniscule share Oly has its pretty difficult to defend mFTs position now.

Only the mFT zealots don't see that.

“Even Blackmagic admits the 4/3" sensor has 13 stops of DR“ you made it sound like if 13-stops of DR was a bad thing.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2019 at 14:44 UTC
On article Blackmagic Design unveils the Pocket Cinema Camera 6K (333 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris 222: Great specs but the absence of a swivel screen on such a cam is simply absurd. What a shame.

Do you want to blog at 6K 🤔 ?

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2019 at 13:49 UTC
Total: 2843, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »