The very frustrating Canon SLR forum - an in-depth user review of the DPREVIEW forums

Marcel D.

Senior Member
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
0
Location
NL
This forum is making me more and more frustrated every week! Not just the Canon SLR forum, but any forum on DPRreview to be honest.

How about that? Although I visit this site for a long time now (since 2000, the year I bought the Coolpix 990), I’m now reading forum posts on a daily basis. I just bought the Canon D60 in a shop (!) a couple of weeks ago (I’m working on my ‘from 990 to G2 to D60 from a user point of view’ essay) and there are MANY posts that are extremely helpful. I’ve got the 28-135 and I’m thinking about the justification of buying a 28-70 (like many of you who are a little insane), I’ve got exposure problems (like many of you) and I’m working on my digital workflow (like many of you). The information posted here has been a remarkable input for my life with the Canon D60. Thank you all very much for this.

So what’s the problem? The forum layout is very frustrating in a situation where there’s too MANY information to gather. Oh no, not another ‘get rid of the threaded forum layout’ message. Well yes, I haven’t seen one here for a couple of weeks, so its time again.

What is my experience?

TIME

I takes me several hours to read a couple of long threads here. I sometimes read this forum at my workplace at the end of the working day, and many times I can go home one to two hours later, after having just read 10 to 15 threads. Every time I get frustrated to see how many time it takes to read so ‘little’ information. It’s even worse when I just want to read five threads before I go to bed. At least one hour goes down the drain every time.

MONEY

My internet costs have been rising dramatically. I’ve heard that local calls often don’t cost anything in the United States, but I have to pay approximately 1 eurocent per online minute. That’s 60 eurocents for an hour of visiting the forum. Because you just READ messages most of the online time, these messages are relatively VERY expensive.

QUIT THREAD

There are many threads I would like to read, but the time and costs keep me from doing so. When I find an interesting thread which has 100 messages, I don’t bother start reading it even if I really want to, or just stop reading it after a small percentage of the messages.

ONE BY ONE

I would like to read my threads on by one. With the current forum layout I’m reading five to ten threads at the same time. I read a message, click ‘next’ and immediately switch over to the following instance of the Internet Explorer to read the next message on another thread. Not doing it this way, would cost me even more time and money.

MORE FORUMS

I only read the Canon SLR forum now. I would be interested in other forums too, but I don’t even THINK about doing this. Then my social life would be gone forever.

ALTERNATIVES

When I visit the forums at Rob Galbraith’s or Fred Mirandas’ site for example, I can search the forum, select twenty threads from the search results, disconnect my internet connection an start reading them offline. Every time I’m amazed how little time it takes to read complete long threads over there. I also have the possibility to SAVE a complete thread with the click of a mouse, so I can read it again later. So why don’t you get your ass over there? Because a search on ’20-35’ only gets me ten results. You guys are HERE and not THERE, and there’s a reason for that.

WHAT’S POSITIVE

The threaded model has its advantages. Getting rid of it would be a great loss. It’s really nice how two or more people can start a side topic in a thread. It’s also relatively easy to spot if someone has been responding to YOUR message and has a remark or question about something. Unfortunately the mentioned ‘other’ forums don’t have this option. Unfortunately Phil thinks his forums are so popular because of the threaded layout and that people who don’t like reading messages one by one are a minority. I really would like an official poll on this, because I really can’t image that I’m alone here.

WOULD BE A GODSEND

It would be a godsend if (a) every user could select the forum model in his user profile (‘one by one’ or ‘thread by thread’) OR (b) every single message would have a link ‘read all messages in this thread’. To prevent the server from having to send very big HTML files, very long threads could be split into for example 25 messages per page. This would be very easy to program in my opinion. I program ASP myself and I believe it takes only one or two hours maximum to program this functionality in its basic form. The threaded model on every message page should NOT be abolished. It should be there at least at the top. You could even show it after each message. I’m sure this can be done using Javascript, so there would be no extra load on the server.

SCREEN WIDTH

What’s also very frustrating is the fact that you can only see a very small part of the subject title. Things like ‘I really don’t now if I should buy …’ or ‘D60 vs D30 and a question about the …’. I keep on hovering with my mouse over these titles all the time, to see if there’s a yellow tooltip, but this doesn’t work everytime. I’ve opened many topics, just to find out, that they’re not interesting for me. Although it’s very hard to change the table layout of a site, it’s relatively simple to have a variable cell height. Just don’t clip the long title (or clip it so it would not exceed TWO lines) and you’re probably done. This could be a user profile setting. Very simple to implement and a major improvement.

I’m done. I now it’s Phil’s site and only he decides what it should be. I just wanted to share my everyday frustration with you to get it of my back, because I spend so much valuable time of my life here. Valuable time, which can be reduced easily (it can be halved, at least) by other technical solutions. Thank you for reading until this point and have a nice (D60) day.

Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
 
Marcel,

I like the idea of being able to see the entire thread in a page I think that would speed reading some what. Ultimately how easy it is to do depends on the design that Phil currently has set up for the site, but I think given a sensible architecture doing what you suggest (as far as the single thread option is concerned) should be rather easy.

who knows maybe Phil has been thinking about this as well.

Regards,
WOULD BE A GODSEND

It would be a godsend if (a) every user could select the forum
model in his user profile (‘one by one’ or
‘thread by thread’) OR (b) every single message would
have a link ‘read all messages in this thread’. To
prevent the server from having to send very big HTML files, very
long threads could be split into for example 25 messages per page.
This would be very easy to program in my opinion. I program ASP
myself and I believe it takes only one or two hours maximum to
program this functionality in its basic form. The threaded model on
every message page should NOT be abolished. It should be there at
least at the top. You could even show it after each message.
I’m sure this can be done using Javascript, so there would be
no extra load on the server.

Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
--

 
I agree with most of your points Marcel.

I spend a lot less time here these days because I get so frustrated waiting for the next post. I seem to remember Phil weighing in on this topic once before, saying that he believed it only took a few seconds to load the next post, on average. I have broadband at work and home and seldom see that kind of performance. I definitely spend more time waiting for posts to load than I do reading them. So now I scan the list of topics, only attempting to read those that I think have a relatively high probability of being interesting.

And yes, using the full width of the screen would be much better for the users.

But it is Phil's site so what he says goes.

Dave
 
This forum is making me more and more frustrated every week! Not
just the Canon SLR forum, but any forum on DPRreview to be honest.
MONEY

My internet costs have been rising dramatically. I’ve heard
that local calls often don’t cost anything in the United
States, but I have to pay approximately 1 eurocent per online
minute. That’s 60 eurocents for an hour of visiting the
forum. Because you just READ messages most of the online time,
these messages are relatively VERY expensive.
Hey Marcel!
Get a xDSL connection. It's cheap on has no time limit!
Regards
Hartmut
--
D30, D60

28-70 L, 100-400 L IS, 2x28-135 IS, SIGMA 17-35/2,8, Tamron 90/2.8 MACRO, Tamron 28-300
 
I would like to have one! I could host my own site on my own server then.

But unfortunately ADSL isn't available in the town where I live. Maybe next year :-(

Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
Hey Marcel!
Get a xDSL connection. It's cheap on has no time limit!
Regards
Hartmut
 
Well not that this is not a decent forum, it is from a contents
point of view but not so much from a technical point of view.
A practical forum (or newsgroup) allows different modes to read
online
online compressed
and a digest mode

online = like it is now by thread, subject or other substructure

online compressed .. a generated page with all new entries after
a certain date/entry in chronological order per subject/thread

digest mode = like the online compressed page but sent by email
for all subjects I subscribe to ... This is how I read several other
newsgroups ...

regards gmd
 
I have used cable modems in IL and OK in the US, and I seldom have any wait for loading posts. I have used it on T3 at school, and the same results. Alot of the loading issues isn't the sites fault. The internet is a interesting thing, and depending on what routes your packets take you can get slowed down at a intermediate switch off spot.

Keep up the good work Phil!

Aaron
I agree with most of your points Marcel.

I spend a lot less time here these days because I get so frustrated
waiting for the next post. I seem to remember Phil weighing in on
this topic once before, saying that he believed it only took a few
seconds to load the next post, on average. I have broadband at work
and home and seldom see that kind of performance. I definitely
spend more time waiting for posts to load than I do reading them.
So now I scan the list of topics, only attempting to read those
that I think have a relatively high probability of being
interesting.

And yes, using the full width of the screen would be much better
for the users.

But it is Phil's site so what he says goes.

Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Kennedy
http://students.ou.edu/K/Aaron.D.Kennedy-1/
 
Can't read it all, all the time. I also find it impossible to check out and post in "appropriate" dpreview forums, and I stretch the rules to inquire about non-camera issues. (I just posted question for choosing between YarcPlus and BreezeBlower) Earlier, I recommended some "Re: " conventions to help us scan new posts for items of particular interest within a forum such as Canon SLR Talk.
See> > >

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=2732452

Neal Martin
 
And all this talk about DSL, etc. doesn't help. I'm on a much faster connection here at work, but I still find it very frustrating to have to click through all of the threads instead of scanning for the meaningful replies like I can do on robgalbraith.com. If everyone would try to put the highlight of their reply in the subject line, it would help. It makes no sense to see the same subject lines 100s of times.

I'm sure Phil has far too much to do with his reviews to convert all of the Forums -- so I'll stumble through -- and so will you.

John Rausch
 
So what’s the problem? The forum layout is very frustrating
in a situation where there’s too MANY information to gather.
I feel your pain, and I do agree.

My research shows first that people are insanely militant about the forum style they prefer. It's weird! I also find from usability studies that this "Usenet" like arrangement isn't good for a few reasons. First, it breaks up conversation on tangents. It'd be like a group splitting up into different rooms after starting in one room, and then having to catch up as you moved room to room. Humans don't communicate that way.

From a performance standpoint, it's fewer database calls (and fewer add views) in this style.

What do I know... I'm biased. I wrote POP Forums (.net version coming soon)... http://www.popforums.com

--
http://www.sillynonsense.com
 
That's a nice thread. I missed it because of the strange title.

I often thought it would be handy if the forum software gives a poster the change to select a category, like 'question', 'opinion' or 'poll'.

Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
I recommended some "Re: " conventions to help us scan new posts
for items of particular interest within a forum such as Canon SLR
Talk.
See> > >

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=2732452
 
and.. it helps a lot to if people don't post images, but links to the images instead and erase non relevant text.

Bart
 
While Phil says that he does not want to change the thread format altogether, I do believe he is working on some modifications to make browsing his site more comfortable. Sounds like a summer project to me, maybe released in September...
 
That would be a nice start. Did Phil mention this once in a message on one of these forums?

Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
While Phil says that he does not want to change the thread format
altogether, I do believe he is working on some modifications to
make browsing his site more comfortable. Sounds like a summer
project to me, maybe released in September...
 
Since everyone is venting their likes and dislikes, I will contribute my pet peeve:

Why, oh why, do people insist on not taking a moment to delete the image link when they reply to a message that contained an image. This just doubles, triples, etc., the bandwidth it takes to load and read a thread.

I have seen 6 or more replies and each one contained the original image link. If I were Phil, I would be ranting at the evildoers until it stopped. He has more patience that me I guess.

Soapbox off, 8(

bob snow
 
Phil did mention some changes of some sort coming (but not my invented time frame).

bg
Marcel D.
The Netherlands
GC-S5 - 990 - G2 - D60 ( BG-ED3 - 28-135 - 550EX )
http://fotohoek.go.to
While Phil says that he does not want to change the thread format
altogether, I do believe he is working on some modifications to
make browsing his site more comfortable. Sounds like a summer
project to me, maybe released in September...
 
I would like to read my threads on by one. With the current forum
layout I’m reading five to ten threads at the same time. I
read a message, click ‘next’ and immediately switch
over to the following instance of the Internet Explorer to read the
next message on another thread.
I found it funny to read this, as I'm currently sitting here with about ten dpreview windows open on various threads, and waiting for about half of 'em to load...
 
Clicking through the messages in one thread
is the most annoying misfeature of this
forum.

Robert F. Tobler

PS: Of course this is counterbalanced by
the great content offered by this site,
but we want this site to be the best in
every respect.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top