same here....
yet, i think it's more of the white balance in the camera set to overcast or shade setting. they amplify the dreaded red too much, which, is not easily controlled under SPP.
use sunlight WB in camera then adjust in SPP.
yet, i think it's more of the white balance in the camera set to overcast or shade setting. they amplify the dreaded red too much, which, is not easily controlled under SPP.
use sunlight WB in camera then adjust in SPP.
See the following picture. This happens to me all the time.
Now, what should I do w/r/t exposure so that the reds (and yellows and oranges for that matter) come out looking as they should and not like this? Use -n EV on every picture that contains red/yellow/orange flowers? If so, how do I solve for n? Everything else looks just fine to me, if I underexpose the rest won't that lead to other problems?
Thanks for any charity you might bestow on the severely intellectually challenged.
Len
What a novel concept! You mean that exposure is important when using a Sigma camera? Does this apply to photography in general?
The Sigma SD1 site is plastered with a red theme and a model in a flowing red dress.
http://www.sigma-sd.com/SD1/message.html
I hope they have conquered the blown red problems.
I get this a lot with red roses.
N.
--
There is more happiness in giving than receiving.