$2200 for D60, $150 for basic 28mm 2.8 lens or $319 for a 24-85
lens. No need for L glass. $2350-$2550 to get started. The D60 is
the smallest digital SLR cam you can get. I use the same bag that I
used for my Dimage 7hi. Is teh DImage a bad cam? NO! Its got a
great feel, the best features, great EVF, GREAT lens BUT the images
are noisy as heck! Take any D7hi shot, even in sunlight and view it
at 100% on your screen.
What do you want to do that for, other than to work on the shot in
Photoshop? I personally then either downsize for the web, in which
case the noise goes away, or want to print out, which is the real
test.
The noise is everywhere.I have also owned a
SOny 707 and it was good, but I liked the Dimage better becuase of
its look and feel and features. If you want to spend $1200 Id get
the Nikon 5700.
I agree the 707 was a good camera, and the 717 is better, but the
5700?
It's low-light capabilities are so poor that you wouldn't even be
able to see to get the shot without worrying if it had noise!
Want to spend another grand, Id get the D60 and a
cheap prime canon lens like the 28mm or 50mm, OR you can get a
used/refurb D30 for $1200 which will also be better than the D7hi.
So the D60 is really in an entirely different league, which was my
point.
I agree about the D30, but you are talking used, and in your costs
you haven't mentioned the glass needed to bring it up to the full
28-200mm capabilities, plus you would still be swapping lenses and
carrying several lenses.
It's a direction I might go in myself, but it's not without it's
downsides and is certainly more expensive.
Ive owned:
Dimage 7
Dimage 7hi
Sony 707
Olympus E10
Canon D30
Canon D60
All will take a good pic, but the Minolta cams just have the noise.
I saw the noise in my 8X10 prints as well.
On all the shots or just some of them? Are you talking about
low-light shots with a relatively short exposure time?
Absolutely, the D7 series is noisier than the D30's and D60's, but
if you don't expect it to do something which it was not designed to
do and work within it's limitations it's a great great camera.
The D60, for instance is not as good as the D1s, but no reasonable
person would expect it to be and you have to learn to live with
it's slower AF etc.
A lot of us on this forum who have stuck with the D7 series seem to
be pretty happy with our prints.
And most of us only rarely feel the need to use Neat Image etc.
I stilll don't really feel that your comparison is really the best
one.
Regards,
DaveMart