Is the XT-1 too expensive?

[VertigonA380]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1. Sure it might outspec the D7100 in some regards but the D7100 is still a very capable camera, add to this some great value for money lenses and a wide assortment of accessories and it makes the predicted XT-1 prices a little overboard. As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other. If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

 

[Eddaweaver]

Yes but if it doesn't sell they will lower the price and hope they sell lenses.

 

[Fr432]

Expensive, yes. Too expensive, not to many. Buying a fujifilm camera is quite similar to buying a Mac. On paper it should be 25-30% cheaper. You're paying for the camera, the experience, and an image associated.

Don't think I'm knocking it, though. I love Fujis and will be preordering at midnight on the 28th.

 

[hellocrowley]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1.

The XPro1 was $1700 when it came out even though it was buggy and lacking in many aspects. Niche products don't offer good bang for the bucks. When CaNikon get serious with mirrorless, I suspect their massive economy of scale will force other manufacturers to lower the prices.

 

[Valentinian]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1. Sure it might outspec the D7100 in some regards but the D7100 is still a very capable camera, add to this some great value for money lenses and a wide assortment of accessories and it makes the predicted XT-1 prices a little overboard. As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other. If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

You get what you pay for. Also, at this time you pay also for the research that goes into developing a mirrorless system digital camera.

The mirror system digital cameras have less need for new research: their manufacturers must only turn digital cameras systems already existing for long long time.

The XT-1 must cost considerably, if it has to be a mirrorless camera at the status of art edge.

 

[Brad Evans]

>>> Is the XT-1 too expensive?

How can that question be answered if the price has not yet been released?

............

Brad
Urban photoblog: http://www.citysnaps.net
.

 

[topstuff]

No it is not too expensive.

 

[Albert Valentino]

>>> Is the XT-1 too expensive?

How can that question be answered if the price has not yet been released?

Exactly. So far we have nothing but rumors on price But it is fair to expect to to be more expensive than the XE2.

 

[Bx100]

>>> Is the XT-1 too expensive?

How can that question be answered if the price has not yet been released?

............

Brad
Urban photoblog: http://www.citysnaps.net
.

Exactly but price should be in between xe2 and xp1 --- I would say reasonable
--
Bx100

B N

Explore B N’s 847 photos on Flickr!

www.flickr.com

 

[yardcoyote]

I would expect the (hypothetical) price differential has to do with both economies of scale (large companies sell lots of cameras) and the fact that established technology is "already paid for". I'm sure you could buy any number of sound basic DSLR bodies and several very fine mid level ones for less than the projected prices I am reading for the new Fuji.

My own Pentax is an excellent camera and I doubt I have the cost of an XT-1 and one lens in my entire kit, since I bought my lenses used. And yet, I am thinking about a Fuji myself ...

 

[miniTO]

Honestly those are totally different camera's...

The D7100 is probably close to double the weight and then its physically bigger on top of that. Plus equivalent primes from Nikon are larger. In the end if you fine with that buy a D7100 it is a great camera.

My previous 5DII never really left home with out a reason because of the system size. My Fuji system is 3 prime lenses in a small bag that weighs in around the same ball park as just my previous Canon body. In the end the best camera is the one you have with you when you need it.

There is a reason that mirrorless cameras are popular...

 

[John Gellings]

DSLRs are always the biggest bang for the buck. If you like them, use them. For the rest of us, thankfully Fuji makes X cameras. I'll pay the extra for something I actually love using.

 

[gerard boulanger]

As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other.

A very strange statement here... What this is to do with pricing?

If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

D 610 a compact FF? Maybe the A7, but not the D 610, check for yourself with a size comparison between the X-E2 and the D 610 here: http://camerasize.com/compare/#486,493

By the way the X-T1 will be slightly less long than the X-E2, but about 1/2" taller due to the EVF housing.

Sorry, but arguing a camera might be too expensive using your arguments does not make a good point. Let's find out if the X-T1 will perform as the rumors said.

 

[Tapper123]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1. Sure it might outspec the D7100 in some regards but the D7100 is still a very capable camera, add to this some great value for money lenses and a wide assortment of accessories and it makes the predicted XT-1 prices a little overboard. As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other. If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

We should all wait until Monday and see what the actual price will be.

Right now it's all conjecture. Personally I doubt it will be more than $1299 for the body, and hopefully $1199. Then again, if it means better construction, I'm fine with $1299. But let's wait and see. Just a couple of days...

 

[VertigonA380]

Thanks everyone for your insights. I have come to the conclusion that the XT-1 will sell just fine, even thought the Em-1 is a nice camera, I personally loathe the idea of the M43 format. After looking at some of the speculation, there is no mention of focus peaking, PiP magnification or touch focus. I love to be able to get a great shot without going through the menus and the layout of the XT-1, I think is superb given it's size. Are there any of these features you believe Fuji will implement into the XT-1?

 

[mistermejia]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1. Sure it might outspec the D7100 in some regards but the D7100 is still a very capable camera, add to this some great value for money lenses and a wide assortment of accessories and it makes the predicted XT-1 prices a little overboard. As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other. If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

Before coming here to the fuji forum, i WAS one of those that thought that fuji was too expensive, but now after experiencing with the "basic" fuji X10, now i have a much more understanding what fuji is all about. This camera company produces top notch IQ and so are their lenses.

The small size and weight is PRECIOUS when you go out on vacation, and not to mention hiking. From my point of view, in order to put all this technology in a very very small body takes a lot of invention and hard work.

On top of that, the AF of the X-Terminator (i call it), is supposed to be better than the X-E2, plus it will have a HUGE HUGE view finder, which is something i have been dreaming to have for a long time.

For me the X-T1 will be worth it

By the way, it sounds to me like you have never experienced owning any compact size fuji? Try one and see for yourself

 

[VertigonA380]

Your right I have never owned a Fuji. I am all for making the best shot possible with the camera and if it does have the features I mentioned before, the extra could be worth it. Personally I don't need super light weight but sure, for some people where weight is critical I get they want the best performance/weight ratio possible. Having said that, it's amusing when someone overweight starts moaning about a few extra grams on a camera body. I have decided to wait until solid specifications come out and some people here test drive the new XT-1. I am a Nikon shooter, but lately their offerings have been dismal at the smaller scale with problems in some of their FF bodies. I recently sold all my N1 gear, too many stupid lens overlaps and no V3 announcement, I had enough. I wouldn't spend serious money on a M43 camera, the format is stupid and ancient in my opinion, so far the Fuji is looking good.

 

[DarnGoodPhotos]

Thanks everyone for your insights. I have come to the conclusion that the XT-1 will sell just fine, even thought the Em-1 is a nice camera, I personally loathe the idea of the M43 format. After looking at some of the speculation, there is no mention of focus peaking, PiP magnification or touch focus. I love to be able to get a great shot without going through the menus and the layout of the XT-1, I think is superb given it's size. Are there any of these features you believe Fuji will implement into the XT-1?

The X100S has focus peak highlighting and digital split image focusing aids, it stands to reason so will the X-TI. A lot of camera parameters can be adjusted in the Quick menu, take a look at how that works.

In regards to whether its too expensive, that really depends on how much you are comfortable spending on camera gear.

 

[liquid stereo]

I am happy with all I have read about the XT-1 but is it too expensive? I mean with the D7100 available for less than $1000, Fuji is asking $1300-$1800 for the XT-1. Sure it might outspec the D7100 in some regards but the D7100 is still a very capable camera, add to this some great value for money lenses and a wide assortment of accessories and it makes the predicted XT-1 prices a little overboard. As far as size goes, you will need a camera bag for both, they obviously aren't pocketable so to me they are about as inconvenient as each other. If the price is around $1600 then we are at the D610 FF camera price level, which is a compact FF camera. What do you think?

It doesn't do half of what people claimed it would do and it cost more than I wanted to spend.

 

[Davidgilmour]

is it too expensive?

yes! just wait and don't buy it, the price WILL drop.