SrMi
Veteran Member
I understand that some prefer Fuji GFX, and I know some prefer Hasselblad X1D/X2D.as a paying customer of all 3 (fuji, hasselblad and DJI) I was happy to see DJI "investing" in Hasselblad, but having owned X1D, X1DII and 907 I also have to say that the GFX 100s and its existing system is simply a no brainer. looking into GFX 100II now so I looked at the X2D as well but its just hard to justify. I was really hoping for DJI bring advanced AF into the X system (lidar?!) or actually any other "consumer oriented" tech that would improve the hasselblad. I dont mind slow and deliberate shooting but I can do that with any fast camera. The hasselblad lenses can be great, some are surprisingly mediocre, the fuji lenses are stupid great and cheap. The DJI "base" in LA is in no way helping the brand. I have been there for demos, I cant believe DJI is there, one can think about the Leica stores as too glossy, but they do make me want to buy something there and give me confidence in the product (even if repair times are just as ridiculous as Hasselblad, maybe even longer which is why I dont have a Leica) which brings me the "pro" point: I had an issue with my GFX, I was without a camera for 5 days and no I am not a pro service member.
I wish DJI would help Hasselblad out with tech, simply make the X competitive to GFX, right now I just dont see a rational reason to go with an X2D, especially with the GFX 100s prices so low. I have a friend who is selling his X1D system now, he did not expect to get much for the body but he is shocked that the used lens market seems to be on the floor as well.
if you are trying to sell the lifestyle with the camera (like Leica does) you simply have to invest a lot more. putting Hasselblad on drones and cellphones will do the opposite in the long run.
But I do not understand people who cannot understand that others may prefer a different brand of camera.
