DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon 8-15 fisheye

Started 2 months ago | Discussions
Alessandro77
Alessandro77 New Member • Posts: 18
Canon 8-15 fisheye

Hello all, I need an advice about the Canon 8-15 fisheye.

I'm creating virtual tours for many years, and up to now I've used a 5D Mk2 with and old, but still excellent, Carl Zeiss Distagon fisheye 16mm 2.8 (with adapter).

Now I'm planning to renew my equipment, and I'd like to buy an 8-15 and a 5DSR, both used.

My questions:

1) does anybody know if the Canon 8-15 (2010) is really way better than the old Distagon (1975)? I ask because this lens is still really good, even if so old, but my concern is that with a 50 mp camera it's pushed beyond its limit.

2) as I read that the 8-15 gives its best at 8mm, I wonder if I should move to a 5DSR or I better use my old 7D Mk2? In this way I could take advantage of the better performance at 8mm focal on the apsc sensor.

3) do you know where I can find any photo shot with a 5dsr + 8-15 at 15mm, just to evaluate the quality of that combo?

Thanks a lot,
Alessandro

Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EOS 7D
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
John Crowe
John Crowe Veteran Member • Posts: 3,476
Good vintage glass does extremely well on 5DSR

Well, I would not be using a fisheye for virtual tours, especially at full circular 8mm.

I did a quick comparison of my Nikon 8mm f2.8 AI-S, which is similar in age to your Zeiss, to the Canon EF 8-15, using my 5DSR. The Nikon requires a small amount of CA correction which your Zeiss will need too. The Nikon rendered as much detail as the Canon, but the Canon imaged more, what seems to be called, micro contrast.

I ultimately chose to stick with the Nikon because I like the projection better, and I can live with a tiny bit less contrast detail.

The 8/2.8 has only gotten better with more and more pixels that I throw at it, so I suspect your Zeiss will be the same. I have found that my vintage glass does extremely well on the 5DSR, and easily competes with today's glass.

 John Crowe's gear list:John Crowe's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 1.4x Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D +15 more
Emphyrio2 Contributing Member • Posts: 709
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye

I can help with #3 since I have the 5DSR and 8-15; just let me know the aperture and iso you would prefer for a test shot.

I have attached a file photo taken with this combo, taken at the 15 mm end.  This is a reduced file processed with DxO distortion correction at 50%.

I am quite please with both the camera, the lens, and DxO PL.  They work great together.    The fish eye look is great when you want to emphasize it, but DxO distortion correction allows you to get some great wide looks that don't scream fish eye.

This is one of my all time favorite lenses.

Sophie

cruff Regular Member • Posts: 436
8mm sample

In case this can help you make a decision, this picture wasn't taken with the 5DSr (I didn't yet have mine then), but it is one taken at 8 mm with a 6D. The image is of the site where I viewed the 2017 total solar eclipse in Wyoming. The image is obviously uncorrected and has the standard DPP sharpening.

Also if you are using it at 15 mm, have you considered possibly using the 16-35 f/4 L lens at 16 mm?

Kjeld Olesen
Kjeld Olesen Veteran Member • Posts: 4,594
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye

Alessandro77 wrote:

1) does anybody know if the Canon 8-15 (2010) is really way better than the old Distagon (1975)? I ask because this lens is still really good, even if so old, but my concern is that with a 50 mp camera it's pushed beyond its limit.

It may be hard to find anyone who have done a direct comparison until you do it
Here is a comparison to some other lenses http://michel.thoby.free.fr/Canon_8-15mm/8-15mm_review.html

2) as I read that the 8-15 gives its best at 8mm, I wonder if I should move to a 5DSR or I better use my old 7D Mk2? In this way I could take advantage of the better performance at 8mm focal on the apsc sensor.

I doubt this, I find my 8-15 mm to perform very well at 15 mm, but I "only" have a 6D and not the 5Ds.

3) do you know where I can find any photo shot with a 5dsr + 8-15 at 15mm, just to evaluate the quality of that combo?

Though not from the 5Ds, there are some samples from a 5D mkII here
https://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/677-canon815f4

You will find a couple of examples of defishing images from the 8-15 mm in this video, though at reduced resolution of cause :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI-ezOBnqwg

-- hide signature --
 Kjeld Olesen's gear list:Kjeld Olesen's gear list
Canon EOS M Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS M5 Canon EOS R6
bodeswell Senior Member • Posts: 1,378
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye

Alessandro77 wrote:

Hello all, I need an advice about the Canon 8-15 fisheye.

I'm creating virtual tours for many years, and up to now I've used a 5D Mk2 with and old, but still excellent, Carl Zeiss Distagon fisheye 16mm 2.8 (with adapter).

Now I'm planning to renew my equipment, and I'd like to buy an 8-15 and a 5DSR, both used.

My questions:

1) does anybody know if the Canon 8-15 (2010) is really way better than the old Distagon (1975)? I ask because this lens is still really good, even if so old, but my concern is that with a 50 mp camera it's pushed beyond its limit.

The 8-15 works fine on my R5, at least as far as I am concerned. Can’t speak to the 5ds r or the Distagon.

2) as I read that the 8-15 gives its best at 8mm, I wonder if I should move to a 5DSR or I better use my old 7D Mk2? In this way I could take advantage of the better performance at 8mm focal on the apsc sensor.

Well, putting it on a crop means losing the ability to get a circular fisheye photo.

3) do you know where I can find any photo shot with a 5dsr + 8-15 at 15mm, just to evaluate the quality of that combo?

Alas I do not.

Thanks a lot,
Alessandro

 bodeswell's gear list:bodeswell's gear list
Canon EOS R Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7 Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM +4 more
Alessandro77
OP Alessandro77 New Member • Posts: 18
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye

Thank you all gentlemen. Sorry for my late reply, I've been quite busy this week.

John Crowe / cruff:

I prefer using a full frame fisheye rather than a rectilinear wide lens because in this way I need to shoot only 6+2 images instead of about 18 with say a 16mm, and the quality of the resulting spherical photo I get is very good anyway. I have some CA issues with Distagon too.

Emphyrio2:

The quality of that photo is astonishing. I also usually shoot af f/8 or f/11. I always keep iso at 100, as I use a tripod.

Kjeld Olsen:

the pages you linked are very useful, especially the Michael Toby one, so thanks a lot.

bodeswell:

Putting the fisheye lens on a crop sensor, yes, I lose the circular output, but I don't mind. I read the max quality available is at 8mm but looking at the photos shot at 15mm, they are awsome, so in the end I think I'll go for buying it and using it 15mm coupled to a 5DSR.

Rock and Rollei Senior Member • Posts: 2,916
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye
1

I don't have the Zeiss lens, but I do have the 8-15, had it for about 10 years, and have previously used the EF 15mm f1.8 Fisheye; I have the 14mm f3.5 Voigtlander Color F Skoparex AR fisheye for Rollei QBM, the Pentax fisheye for Q, an 8mm f2.8 Samyang for Canon EF-M and a 30mm f3.5 Arsat for my Exakta 66 medium format camera, so I have quite a bit of experience with fisheyes. For me, this is the best of the bunch, and that's considering them as direct competitors, all as diagonal fisheyes. The fact that it's a circular fisheye as well is an added, albeit occasional, bonus.  The old Canon 15 was pretty much as sharp, but worse fringing and to be honest, the lens cap had become a major hassle - forever dropping off, and you really don't need that with a fisheye. The cheap Samyang is excellent, needs stopping down a little, but produces similar quality. Can't directly compare the Artsat or the Pentax, but they're not as good, and the Voigtlander (Mamiya-made, I believe) isn't quite as good, but it was decent enough on film not to search out the Rollei version of your Zeiss.

 Rock and Rollei's gear list:Rock and Rollei's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS R Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM +29 more
John Crowe
John Crowe Veteran Member • Posts: 3,476
Arsat 30mm Fisheye on 5DSR.

I shift and stitch the Arsat 30mm Fisheye on my 5DSR.  It is sharper than my 17 TS-E at the centre so it would be sharper than any of the other fisheyes.  Now, sharpness does fall off a lot once shifted to the extremes but still very useful.  The CA is easily fixed in post.  The 36x54mm 112MP equivalent images are awesome too.  I have not experimented with LCC correction yet to utilize the approximate 24x66mm 92MP equivalent.

My Arsat came with a Mamiya 645 adapter, and I use a Kipon Mamiya 645 to EF Shift adapter.  More expensive than the lens but I use it for another as well.  You may find it fun to use on your DSLR!

I will post a sample when I get to my computer.

 John Crowe's gear list:John Crowe's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 1.4x Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D +15 more
Rock and Rollei Senior Member • Posts: 2,916
Re: Arsat 30mm Fisheye on 5DSR.

That's interesting. I do have that adapter for using the Arsat on M645 too. I have the 24 TS-E Ii, so haven't considered using the 30 in that way. I might at some point, because I could use other lenses with that adapter.
The Arsat IS sharp in the middle, but drops off quite quickly even on 6x6. The Canon is probably the fisheye with the most even performance across the frame I've ever used at 15mm.

 Rock and Rollei's gear list:Rock and Rollei's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS R Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM +29 more
Emphyrio2 Contributing Member • Posts: 709
Re: Canon 8-15 fisheye

Alessandro77,

The photos posted below were taken with the 8-15 mm fisheye combined with the 5DSR & 7D at different focal lengths, and with different levels of distortion correction applied in post processing.  All shots were taken at iso 100, f8, and at the same tripod location.  The purpose of the sequence is to give an idea of the range of perspectives that can be achieved, not to demonstrate detail   Detail is not good because I have substantially reduced the file sizes. For detail, see puppy photo above.

I have found that 50% distortion correction is a sweet spot that gives good results for  captures in natural settings, for instance without architectural details to remind of distortion.  100% distortion correction yields unnatural results, cannot compete with rectilinear lenses.

5DSR / 8mm / 0% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 8mm / 50% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 8mm / 100% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 12mm / 0% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 12mm / 50% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 12mm / 100% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 15mm / 0% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 15mm / 50% Distortion Correction

5DSR / 15mm / 100% Distortion Correction

7D / 8mm / 0% Distortion Correction

7D / 8mm / 50% Distortion Correction

7D / 8mm / 100% Distortion Correction

7D / 12mm / 0% Distortion Correction

7D / 12mm / 50% Distortion Correction

7D / 12mm /100% Distortion Correction

7D / 15mm /  0% Distortion Correction

7D / 15mm / 50% Distortion Correction

7D / 15mm / 100% Distortion Correction

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads