DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Started 1 month ago | Questions
Distinctly Average Senior Member • Posts: 2,527
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
2

Seb P wrote:

Distinctly Average wrote:

Seb P wrote:

Distinctly Average wrote:

Seb P wrote:

Dareshooter wrote:

Seb P wrote:

Thanks Distinctly Average & spec68.

Spec68, ok regarding lack of contrast and sharpness but can this explain the autofocus errors ?

(photos taken at 9:30 a.m.)

Look at where the focus reticule is in relation to the subject. Much of it falls outside so there's more room for AF error.

I don't understand why the AF box is wrong placed. Because during the shot the box seems to follow correctly the subject ... Is it too fast maybe ?

Can you post your case settings? Also, have you tried setting your case to auto?

What was the percentage of in focus shots? How much did you have to crop to see that?

During this burst, i thing 6/10 shots are blurry. (even when the subject is coming to me, no very fast lateral movement). The images are not cropped at all.

I use the Case "Auto".

Lateral movement is often a lot easier for the camera to track than a bird flying at you.

I think you probably just need practice and better conditions. Black subjects can be a nightmare. We’ve all been there and had the same struggles. Some days you get everything right, other days it doesn’t go so well. In better light with less cropping you will almost certainly have a much higher hit rate. Personally I look at the bad days as an excuse to go out and shoot more. It is a challenge that I relish. Sometimes it is disheartening, but then another day you come home with an image that the moment you take it the smile begins.

Thanks. I hope it's as you said and that my camera & lens are ok ...

I am sure they are. Those last three of the warbler, it is very small in the frame so is almost certainly going to struggle.

Karen Casebeer
Karen Casebeer Contributing Member • Posts: 902
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

If I set my ISO manually, and start low and gradually increase it, I have better control over the shutter speed while I’m in Av.  I can make sure I have enough shutter speed for birds in flight.  I live in northwestern Lower Michigan where winters are pretty grey and with the constant F8 aperture, it has helped me get better pictures.

 Karen Casebeer's gear list:Karen Casebeer's gear list
Canon EOS M50 II Canon EOS R10 Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
Distinctly Average Senior Member • Posts: 2,527
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

Karen Casebeer wrote:

If I set my ISO manually, and start low and gradually increase it, I have better control over the shutter speed while I’m in Av. I can make sure I have enough shutter speed for birds in flight. I live in northwestern Lower Michigan where winters are pretty grey and with the constant F8 aperture, it has helped me get better pictures.

Unfortunately that doesn’t work everywhere. I shoot auto ISO in M mode and use compensation where required. Others swear by the new Fv mode,

Seb P
OP Seb P New Member • Posts: 21
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Karen Casebeer wrote:

If I set my ISO manually, and start low and gradually increase it, I have better control over the shutter speed while I’m in Av. I can make sure I have enough shutter speed for birds in flight. I live in northwestern Lower Michigan where winters are pretty grey and with the constant F8 aperture, it has helped me get better pictures.

OK I understand , thanks Karen. (Do you have few pictures - made with this method - to show me, please ?)

 Seb P's gear list:Seb P's gear list
Canon PowerShot S120 Canon EOS R10 Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
birdbrain
birdbrain Veteran Member • Posts: 4,258
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Distinctly Average wrote:

Karen Casebeer wrote:

If I set my ISO manually, and start low and gradually increase it, I have better control over the shutter speed while I’m in Av. I can make sure I have enough shutter speed for birds in flight. I live in northwestern Lower Michigan where winters are pretty grey and with the constant F8 aperture, it has helped me get better pictures.

Unfortunately that doesn’t work everywhere. I shoot auto ISO in M mode and use compensation where required. Others swear by the new Fv mode,

FV mode is good but I stick to AV mode and up the minimum shutter speed in the settings by +1.

I also use spot metering and dab the DOF button to check exposure and dial in compensation as needed.

Using exposure simulation all the time I never got on with?

-- hide signature --
 birdbrain's gear list:birdbrain's gear list
Sony RX10 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM +7 more
Karen Casebeer
Karen Casebeer Contributing Member • Posts: 902
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Here are three shots of cormorants I took a couple days ago.  You can see with each manual upping of the ISO, the shutter speed increases until at 3200 ISO, I finally get a decent shutter speed for birds that move.  These are straight out of the camera with no post-processing.

1/200 at 400 ISO

1/500 at 1600 ISO

1/1000 at 3200 ISO

 Karen Casebeer's gear list:Karen Casebeer's gear list
Canon EOS M50 II Canon EOS R10 Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
Seb P
OP Seb P New Member • Posts: 21
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Thanks a lot !

Nice shots (and finally I prefer the first, because of the attitude of the subject)

 Seb P's gear list:Seb P's gear list
Canon PowerShot S120 Canon EOS R10 Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Distinctly Average Senior Member • Posts: 2,527
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Karen Casebeer wrote:

Here are three shots of cormorants I took a couple days ago. You can see with each manual upping of the ISO, the shutter speed increases until at 3200 ISO, I finally get a decent shutter speed for birds that move. These are straight out of the camera with no post-processing.

1/200 at 400 ISO

1/500 at 1600 ISO

1/1000 at 3200 ISO

-- hide signature --

For me it would be hard to change those settings at speed hence using Auto ISO in manual mode. I can set the shutter as I please, as well as aperture which in gloomy UK is often wide open. The  Auto ISO handles the exposure for me.

Just enjoying photography
https://www.distinctlyaverage.co.uk/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/distinctly_average/

sintos Regular Member • Posts: 103
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

spec68 wrote:

I agree it's a combination of bad light and an all black subject. Going off your data shooting at 1/2000 ISO 500, F8 it must have been quite bright out -- like noon sun. Sure looks like it in your last couple of shots. Try again shooting in softer morning or late afternoon light or on a cloudy day.

Would it have been good to underexpose in that case ? I have already experienced that kind of bad IQ with black birds. And with white birds ?

Thanks !

Zeee Forum Pro • Posts: 25,627
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
2

Seb P wrote:

Hello all,

here you are a burst of shots (taken with my R10 & RF100-400mm).

According to you, why most are so bad in original size ?! (lack of contrast, bad focus whereas AF zone seems well positioned, no sharpness)

Only the last one seems correct...

Thanks for your advices

For birds in the sky I automatically add two stops of EC. For Dark birds add more.

-- hide signature --

Don't Look Up.

 Zeee's gear list:Zeee's gear list
Canon EOS R7 Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +1 more
Distinctly Average Senior Member • Posts: 2,527
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
4

sintos wrote:

spec68 wrote:

I agree it's a combination of bad light and an all black subject. Going off your data shooting at 1/2000 ISO 500, F8 it must have been quite bright out -- like noon sun. Sure looks like it in your last couple of shots. Try again shooting in softer morning or late afternoon light or on a cloudy day.

Would it have been good to underexpose in that case ? I have already experienced that kind of bad IQ with black birds. And with white birds ?

Thanks !

I tend to try and expose for the subject in question, and for the sort of image I am trying to achieve. On a really bright day I may want to throw the background into darkness and show off the bird, or I may want a good exposure for the background and have my subject as a silhouette. It is not as simple as just doing X in a particular set of circumstances.

John Photo Senior Member • Posts: 1,371
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
3

I seem to really be missing something in your "method." I would not give up getting acceptable action shots by starting at low shutter speeds and working up. I am more conservative and choose shutter speeds that I feel completely confident in right from the start (and use auto iso).

John Crowe
John Crowe Veteran Member • Posts: 3,476
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

An all black bird gives the AF system very little to go on.  Try some other birds with contrasting feather colours too.

There is only so much you will get from that body and lens.

I know AF of mirrorless is supposed to be spectacular but the closer you can get the subject to the central points the better.

 John Crowe's gear list:John Crowe's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 1.4x Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D +15 more
Zeee Forum Pro • Posts: 25,627
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

John Photo wrote:

I seem to really be missing something in your "method." I would not give up getting acceptable action shots by starting at low shutter speeds and working up. I am more conservative and choose shutter speeds that I feel completely confident in right from the start (and use auto iso).

Me neither. Getting the shot first always counts.

-- hide signature --

Don't Look Up.

 Zeee's gear list:Zeee's gear list
Canon EOS R7 Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +1 more
Seb P
OP Seb P New Member • Posts: 21
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

John Photo wrote:

I seem to really be missing something in your "method." I would not give up getting acceptable action shots by starting at low shutter speeds and working up. I am more conservative and choose shutter speeds that I feel completely confident in right from the start (and use auto iso).

+1

 Seb P's gear list:Seb P's gear list
Canon PowerShot S120 Canon EOS R10 Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Seb P
OP Seb P New Member • Posts: 21
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

John Crowe wrote:

An all black bird gives the AF system very little to go on. Try some other birds with contrasting feather colours too.

There is only so much you will get from that body and lens.

I know AF of mirrorless is supposed to be spectacular but the closer you can get the subject to the central points the better.

OK. Thanks a lot. I hope it will work better with a bearded vulture

By the way, with a stationary subject it seems to work better.

 Seb P's gear list:Seb P's gear list
Canon PowerShot S120 Canon EOS R10 Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Karen Casebeer
Karen Casebeer Contributing Member • Posts: 902
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

I like that one too.

 Karen Casebeer's gear list:Karen Casebeer's gear list
Canon EOS M50 II Canon EOS R10 Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
Karen Casebeer
Karen Casebeer Contributing Member • Posts: 902
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?
1

Sounds like you shoot in manual mode, while I prefer Av.

 Karen Casebeer's gear list:Karen Casebeer's gear list
Canon EOS M50 II Canon EOS R10 Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) Canon EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM
Seb P
OP Seb P New Member • Posts: 21
Re: BIF: why these shots are so bad ?

Karen Casebeer wrote:

I like that one too.

Thanks Karen.

 Seb P's gear list:Seb P's gear list
Canon PowerShot S120 Canon EOS R10 Canon RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads