Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
4
C M Greene wrote:
While I’m a long-time Canon APS-C user with EF and EF-S lenses, I am a relatively new Canon M50 MKII user. I’m really looking for the size & weight reductions with the M system for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. I’ve acquired a few EF-M mount lenses.
I’m trying to make sense of the 50mm lens (80mm in 35mm equivalent) offers.
There is a TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens (manual focus, 10 blade diaphragm) for about $100 and a Rokinon 50mm f/1.2 (manual focus, 9 blade diaphragm) for $500. Anyone with experience with both of these? I’m trying to understand what the Rokinon bring to the party that is worth $400 more — Is the actual quality of the lens that different in terms of glass? I must be missing something…
They're very different lenses, but you really don't need f/1.2 for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. The TTartisan lens looks externally like a Sonnar lens from the 1930s, 7 elements in 5 groups with MTF plots to match.

It's around 336g, so a bit heavier than the EF 50mm f /1.8 autofocus lens on the mount adapter. For comparison, the EF 50mm f /1.8 autofocus lens on the adapter is 65mm long and 260g, the Sigma 56mm is 60mm long and 280g. 10 iris blades will give you ten-pointed (possibly double-pointed) sunstars.
The Samyang is a much more modern design, 9 elements (2 of them aspherical) in 7 groups 74mm long and 385g, so it's the biggest and heaviest possibility. It does have superb image quality and 9 iris blades will give you 18-pointed sunstars. See https://www.samyanglens.com/en/m/product/product-view.php?seq=363 (choose the data tab, the page wouldn't let me copy the diagrams). I bought the Samyang for astro before the Sigma or TTartisan lenses were available. Critical manual focus takes time and effort on EF-M at f/1.2.
Thanks in advance!
PS I also know there is a 56mm f/1.4 offer from Sigma — but this is a different lens in terms of focal length and it has auto-focus. I like Sigma glass a lot, but looking at all the options.