DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses

Started 1 month ago | Discussions
OnTheTrail Regular Member • Posts: 105
EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses

While I’m a long-time Canon APS-C user with EF and EF-S lenses, I am a relatively new Canon M50 MKII user. I’m really looking for the size & weight reductions with the M system for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. I’ve acquired a few EF-M mount lenses.

I’m trying to make sense of the 50mm lens (80mm in 35mm equivalent) offers.

There is a TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens (manual focus, 10 blade diaphragm) for about $100 and a Rokinon 50mm f/1.2 (manual focus, 9 blade diaphragm) for $500. Anyone with experience with both of these? I’m trying to understand what the Rokinon bring to the party that is worth $400 more — Is the actual quality of the lens that different in terms of glass? I must be missing something…

Thanks in advance!

PS I also know there is a 56mm f/1.4 offer from Sigma — but this is a different lens in terms of focal length and it has auto-focus. I like Sigma glass a lot, but looking at all the options.

 OnTheTrail's gear list:OnTheTrail's gear list
Olympus XZ-1 Sony RX100 III Canon EOS 60D Canon EOS Rebel SL1 Canon EOS M6 II +19 more
Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,406
Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
4

C M Greene wrote:

While I’m a long-time Canon APS-C user with EF and EF-S lenses, I am a relatively new Canon M50 MKII user. I’m really looking for the size & weight reductions with the M system for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. I’ve acquired a few EF-M mount lenses.

I’m trying to make sense of the 50mm lens (80mm in 35mm equivalent) offers.

There is a TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens (manual focus, 10 blade diaphragm) for about $100 and a Rokinon 50mm f/1.2 (manual focus, 9 blade diaphragm) for $500. Anyone with experience with both of these? I’m trying to understand what the Rokinon bring to the party that is worth $400 more — Is the actual quality of the lens that different in terms of glass? I must be missing something…

They're very different lenses, but you really don't need f/1.2 for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. The TTartisan lens looks externally like a Sonnar lens from the 1930s, 7 elements in 5 groups with MTF plots to match.

It's around 336g, so a bit heavier than the EF 50mm f /1.8 autofocus lens on the mount adapter. For comparison, the EF 50mm f /1.8 autofocus lens on the adapter is 65mm long and 260g, the Sigma 56mm is 60mm long and 280g. 10 iris blades will give you ten-pointed (possibly double-pointed) sunstars.

The Samyang is a much more modern design, 9 elements (2 of them aspherical) in 7 groups 74mm long and 385g, so it's the biggest and heaviest possibility. It does have superb image quality and 9 iris blades will give you 18-pointed sunstars. See https://www.samyanglens.com/en/m/product/product-view.php?seq=363 (choose the data tab, the page wouldn't let me copy the diagrams). I bought the Samyang for astro before the Sigma or TTartisan lenses were available. Critical manual focus takes time and effort on EF-M at f/1.2.

Thanks in advance!

PS I also know there is a 56mm f/1.4 offer from Sigma — but this is a different lens in terms of focal length and it has auto-focus. I like Sigma glass a lot, but looking at all the options.

lumenite Senior Member • Posts: 1,208
Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
3

C M Greene wrote:

While I’m a long-time Canon APS-C user with EF and EF-S lenses, I am a relatively new Canon M50 MKII user. I’m really looking for the size & weight reductions with the M system for hiking, backpacking, and cycling. I’ve acquired a few EF-M mount lenses.

I’m trying to make sense of the 50mm lens (80mm in 35mm equivalent) offers.

There is a TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens (manual focus, 10 blade diaphragm) for about $100 and a Rokinon 50mm f/1.2 (manual focus, 9 blade diaphragm) for $500. Anyone with experience with both of these? I’m trying to understand what the Rokinon bring to the party that is worth $400 more — Is the actual quality of the lens that different in terms of glass? I must be missing something…

Thanks in advance!

PS I also know there is a 56mm f/1.4 offer from Sigma — but this is a different lens in terms of focal length and it has auto-focus. I like Sigma glass a lot, but looking at all the options.

To me, the difference between AF and MF is much more critical than between f/1.2 and f/1.4 or between 50mm and 56mm. Sigma is top-notch in many ways. I believe there is no reason to choose Rokinon over Sigma. However, the reason for TTartisan is its price alone.

 lumenite's gear list:lumenite's gear list
Canon EOS-1D Canon EOS M Canon EOS M5 Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM +7 more
OP OnTheTrail Regular Member • Posts: 105
Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
3

Thanks for the input. After reviewing these and some others, I decided on the Sigma 56mm. I’ve always had great luck with Sigma glass and think it will serve me here as well.

 OnTheTrail's gear list:OnTheTrail's gear list
Olympus XZ-1 Sony RX100 III Canon EOS 60D Canon EOS Rebel SL1 Canon EOS M6 II +19 more
Lin Labs
Lin Labs New Member • Posts: 2
Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
1

You won't be disappointed, the 56mm is fantastic.

 Lin Labs's gear list:Lin Labs's gear list
Canon EOS M Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS M5 Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M6 II +9 more
AbuMahendra Regular Member • Posts: 106
Re: EF-M 50mm f/1.2 lenses
1

OnTheTrail wrote:

Thanks for the input. After reviewing these and some others, I decided on the Sigma 56mm. I’ve always had great luck with Sigma glass and think it will serve me here as well.

Good move. I just got mine a few days back and I couldn't be happier with it.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads