DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

Started 5 months ago | Discussions
Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Zookeeper

Digirame wrote:

Here's a neat photo I liked. There were no elephants in this area,..only this zookeeper. He was pretty cool about me taking his photo. Look how great this looks at ISO6400. I got enough depth of field too.

Nice. 

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Game birds.

mocha123 wrote:

Hi all,

Lakeside, found these two around the bird hides.

Male Pheasant. (Aperture f/7.1 ~~ (SS): 1/1000 ~~ ISO 6400 ~~ EC: 0 ~~ PASM Mode: Custom ~~ Metering: Partial ~~ Focus Type: AI Servo ~~ FL: 150mm ~~ Lens: Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD ~~ Camera ID: Canon EOS 7D Mark II).

Female Pheasant. (Aperture f/7.1 ~~ (SS): 1/1000 ~~ ISO 2500 ~~ EC: 0 ~~ PASM Mode: Custom ~~ Metering: Partial ~~ Focus Type: AI Servo ~~ FL: 200mm ~~ Lens: Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD ~~ Camera ID: Canon EOS 7D Mark II).

Cool.

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
OP Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Zookeeper - Thanks

Thanks.  The reason the ISO level is so high is that it's an indoor facility for elephants without a lot of lighting.  I wanted a reasonable amount of shutter speed and I had to adjust the aperture so that I had enough depth of field so that even the fence in front was in focus.  There were no elephants there at the time to photograph, but I saw the zookeeper.  He gave me a friendly wave, so I snapped the shutter.

mocha123 Senior Member • Posts: 2,497
Re: Game birds.

Hi Digirame, Thank You.

I was in a bird hide, and they approached without fear, the only difficulty was hanging outside the viewing hatch and pointing the lens in the right direction they were that close.

 mocha123's gear list:mocha123's gear list
Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM +3 more
mocha123 Senior Member • Posts: 2,497
Re: Game birds.

Hi Dunlin, Thank You.

 mocha123's gear list:mocha123's gear list
Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM +3 more
Funkyd3121 Senior Member • Posts: 1,683
Re: Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

The KCS Local here in Tupelo, Mississippi taken with the original 300D/Digital Rebel & the Canon 50mm 1.8 Lens

Same train as above, but taken with my Samsung Galaxy S10e

 Funkyd3121's gear list:Funkyd3121's gear list
Canon PowerShot G7 Canon PowerShot G15 Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 300D +9 more
OP Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

That's a great looking train.  Trains have been around for about two hundred years.  They are old technology that still has plenty of use today.

stevet1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,300
Re: Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

Funkyd3121 wrote:

The KCS Local here in Tupelo, Mississippi taken with the original 300D/Digital Rebel & the Canon 50mm 1.8 Lens

Funkyd3121,

That photo should be in the horizontal lines. challenge.

I know if I was standing that close to a train with a 50mm lens, would have been horizontal.

I would have fainted dead away

Steve Thomas

 stevet1's gear list:stevet1's gear list
Canon EOS Rebel T8i (EOS 850D) Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Canon EF 50mm F1.8 STM Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM
OP Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: Fun - Thanks

For example at this event you can see the three women with their cell phones taking pictures on the left side.  There was another photographer there (that I don't show) with much more expensive equipment than what I had.  I don't know if he was a paid-photographer or not.  I just happened to pass by this area, when I saw the ladies with their pretty dresses.  So I joined in, in taking a few photos.  Fortunately I had my camera with me, as I usually do.

I don't know if you are interested in this or not...let me know if you are.  I'll make it a point to take pictures of other people taking pictures of strangers with their cameras (when I see them doing that).  The camera of choice is usually the cell phone.

The reason I bring this up for you, is that on another forum or this forum, I heard from someone in Scotland that said they would not take pictures of strangers.  He made it sound like a serious offense.  Between us on this side of the ocean, I think there's a big gap in our cultures (depending on where you live).  In London or other large nearby cities the photography-expectations-culture may be also different than in the UK countryside...I don't know...but it sounds like it may.  So, it's not a black and white issue, there's a lot of gray area here.  That's why it's so important to research this, when we travel to different locations.

Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Fun - Thanks

Digirame wrote:

For example at this event you can see the three women with their cell phones taking pictures on the left side. There was another photographer there (that I don't show) with much more expensive equipment than what I had. I don't know if he was a paid-photographer or not. I just happened to pass by this area, when I saw the ladies with their pretty dresses. So I joined in, in taking a few photos. Fortunately I had my camera with me, as I usually do.

I don't know if you are interested in this or not...let me know if you are. I'll make it a point to take pictures of other people taking pictures of strangers with their cameras (when I see them doing that). The camera of choice is usually the cell phone.

Sounds interesting.

The reason I bring this up for you, is that on another forum or this forum, I heard from someone in Scotland that said they would not take pictures of strangers. He made it sound like a serious offense. Between us on this side of the ocean, I think there's a big gap in our cultures (depending on where you live). In London or other large nearby cities the photography-expectations-culture may be also different than in the UK countryside...I don't know...but it sounds like it may. So, it's not a black and white issue, there's a lot of gray area here. That's why it's so important to research this, when we travel to different locations.

Yeah. I've tried to find out local laws but all I could officially find was a long page o photographer's copyright. I guess I'll keep looking.

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

Funkyd3121 wrote:

The KCS Local here in Tupelo, Mississippi taken with the original 300D/Digital Rebel & the Canon 50mm 1.8 Lens

Same train as above, but taken with my Samsung Galaxy S10e

Nice. 

I'm always interested to see the results people are getting with the original rebels.

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
Cheapo Marx
Cheapo Marx Senior Member • Posts: 2,544
Phonework

Look at the shadow details the phone shows (cowcathcher blade, inside face of rails etc.) but not the Canon w/o post processing.

Like it or not, the phone engineers have done brilliant work.

OP Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: Phonework

Yes, the phone engineers have done brilliant work. It's interesting to note although that both photos were taken on separate days with completely different lighting (at least that is how it appears to me). The Galaxy S10e was introduced over 15 years after the Canon 300D with more than twice the megapixels.

Still yet, the cell phone cameras keeping improving each year making it a good reason that I mostly see people using their cell phones for taking pictures. Next, I see DSLR and mirrorless.... The cell phones are very lightweight and silent. They are very convenient to use, if there's not a need for long focal lengths or low light performance etc. And going back to the cell phone picture of the train...yes...it looks very nice and sharp...very impressive.

Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Phonework

Cheapo Marx wrote:

Look at the shadow details the phone shows (cowcathcher blade, inside face of rails etc.) but not the Canon w/o post processing.

Like it or not, the phone engineers have done brilliant work.

Regretfully I have to agree.

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Leaves

A couple of leafy shots I took recently...

This is about as little depth-of-field one can get with a 50mm f/1.8 on a Canon DSLR.

(Aperture f/1.8 ~~ (SS): 1/400 ~~ ISO 400 ~~ EC: 0 ~~ PASM Mode: Aperture Priority ~~ Metering: Evaluative ~~ Focus Type: One Shot ~~ FL: 50mm ~~ Lens: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM ~~ Camera ID: Canon EOS 7D)

And, Autumn's last leaves against a cloudy background.

(Aperture f/8 ~~ (SS): 1/80 ~~ ISO 500 ~~ EC: +1.33 ~~ PASM Mode: Aperture Priority ~~ Metering: Evaluative ~~ Focus Type: One Shot ~~ FL: 55mm ~~ Lens: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM ~~ Camera ID: Canon EOS 7D)

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
OP Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: Leaves

Yes, at F1.8 you have very shallow depth of field.  I think people like to use that lens for portraits.  You could also try to use that lens at night with a very short focal length and F1.8 and see how they turn out.  I like your golden leaves too.  I saw some yesterday on a walkway.

Dunlin Senior Member • Posts: 2,611
Re: Leaves

Digirame wrote:

Yes, at F1.8 you have very shallow depth of field. I think people like to use that lens for portraits. You could also try to use that lens at night with a very short focal length and F1.8 and see how they turn out. I like your golden leaves too. I saw some yesterday on a walkway.

Thanks.

BTW the EF 50mm f/1.8 is a prime lens, so it sadly can't zoom...

 Dunlin's gear list:Dunlin's gear list
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R Gimp +6 more
mocha123 Senior Member • Posts: 2,497
Re: Leaves

Hi Dunlin,

Love it when the background melts away as in your first photo.

 mocha123's gear list:mocha123's gear list
Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM +3 more
Cheapo Marx
Cheapo Marx Senior Member • Posts: 2,544
Re: Phonework

I think it's necessary to acknowledge the strides phone photography has made, entirely devouring the casual-use camera market, but I've tried and I just can't force myself to use one.

I guess it's an age thing, but holding my camera out 18" in front of me and fumbling with my thumb for the on-screen button is just too alien. Gotta have the stability of using a viewfinder and physical shutter button.

By now I'm very used to being regarded by others like a Model T on the interstate.

Funkyd3121 Senior Member • Posts: 1,683
Re: Show Your Snaps...November 21, 2022

Forgot to mention - that Train is NOT Moving, it's idle in the yard until the next morning when they go out to work/switch the local industries.

 Funkyd3121's gear list:Funkyd3121's gear list
Canon PowerShot G7 Canon PowerShot G15 Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 300D +9 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads