DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Started 4 months ago | Discussions
antonio-salieri Regular Member • Posts: 208
Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review
8

I recently bought the Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster. A lot of people have commented on the Canon and Viltrox EF-RF speed boosters, but only a few people have talked about Metabones' offering on the RF mount, even though it's been on the market for a few years now. This is not a scientific review. I have used the Speed Booster, and I can say the image quality is perfectly good (though obviously with more glass you're always introducing the potential for new aberrations). But I don't have any of the competing products myself, so I can't do any direct comparisons (I've tried to read through the reviews/look at samples for the competitors, but I have not tested them myself.) I also don't have any charts or anything to show you. If there is interest, I can try to go out and generate some samples if you want them (I don't normally share my work on threads here because of the privacy aspects, but if I shot images just for DPR forums, that'd be fine.)

Why use a speed booster? I got the booster mostly because I was interested in using my ultra-wide FF lenses on the R7. I sometimes use my R5 and R7 at the same time; I was recently using my 14-24mm f/2.8 on my R7 and thought I could use a wider field of view for my video from that camera. I could have gone for an EF-S 10-22mm or 10-18mm, but those lenses are f/3.5 and f/4.5 at 10mm, respectively. For around the same price as an EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, why not go for a speed booster then (for around the same price) and make my FF 14-24mm f/2.8 an APS-C 10-17mm f/2.0?

My main use — using full-frame lenses on a smaller sensor — is the classical use for a speed booster. But when the Metabones Speed Booster was brought to the RF mount, there was not yet an APS-C RF camera. There are some uses for the booster on full-frame RF cameras. The EOS R shoots 4K only in a ~1.7x crop mode, which was the first major application of this Metabones Speed Booster. If you use an EOS R, that may make this accessory useful. On the R5, shooting 5K RAW in cropped mode may be useful (either because of a smaller file size, 60fps RAW or because it is compatible with the original Atomos Ninja V in this mode). And so on.

The exact crop factor you get will depend on your camera and mode. Metabones offers this handy guide to the crop factors you'll get with various different setups.

(A little note, because this can confuse people sometimes. The speed booster does not actually change any properties of your lens. My 14-24mm f/2.8 will show as a 10-17mm f/2.0, but the actual properties of the lens have not changed. The difference is that the image circle has been projected onto a smaller space than usual, just like an extender projects the image circle onto a larger space. This is really useful for packing an image large enough for a full-frame sensor so that most of it can be seen by a smaller APS-C camera sensor. The displayed values are the equivalent ones: the lens now functions as an APS-C 10-17mm f/2.0 lens. But this doesn't change how much light is physically let in through the lens' front element. You will not get more light on your APS-C sensor/in crop mode than you would get on a FF sensor in full-frame mode. Exceptionally, you will get more light on your sensor by using more of the image circle as described in a later section, but this is usually pretty severely limited by the size of the image circle your lens projects.)

Why the Metabones? I'd heard good things about Metabones' 0.71x boosters on other mounts, and the EF-RF 0.71x booster reportedly shares its optics with those. Canon's (slightly more expensive) speed booster is only fully compatible in firmware with the C70, and so use on other RF cameras requires passing through a warning screen and potential future oddities.

Viltrox pulled their speed booster off the market when they pulled their RF lens from sale. I would prefer to buy a product currently on the market and getting consistent firmware support. In addition, I'd looked into reviews of the Viltrox booster and got the impression that it was perhaps of worse optical quality than Metabones on various other mounts. (I have absolutely no concerns about Metabones pulling their adapter; tons of companies offer EF-RF adapters, including filter adapters, speed boosters, etc., with no issues; I suspect Viltrox pulling their booster and adapter had to do with some settlement relating to the AF lens and not related to these products themselves, but anyway, if you want to discuss that, there are threads for it.)

Besides Canon and Metabones, there is also a Venus Optics Laowa EF-RF speed booster, but this is only designed for their probe lenses, and doesn't include any electrical contacts (since their probe lenses are fully manual). I wasn't interested in buying that.

Some Canon and Viltrox speed booster reviews/comments both noted that these focal reducers could result in a purple circle in flare in backlit scenarios. Obviously this doesn't occur in all circumstances, and of course it has to do with the optical design of these boosters. They don't have the same design, but they do both reportedly exhibit this problem sometimes. Since I didn't see anyone (I could have missed something) complain about the Metabones 0.71x Ultra Speed Booster exhibiting this issue on other mounts (and the optics for their 0.71x are the same across mounts), I figured that this point might be better with Metabones than Canon (or Viltrox).

Finally, the Metabones Speed Booster ($480) is cheaper than Canon's offering ($600), though not as cheap as Viltrox's (currently selling online for like, $300?) and Laowa's ($250) were/are (plus, it's still current and has electronic contacts).

Build quality and physical attributes. The speed booster feels solid. It has a metal construction and feels nice in the hand. The mounts aren't weather sealed, however. It fits quite snugly on the camera and lens mounts, with as little play as I've felt on any adapter. (The lens mount on my copy actually feels if anything a slight bit rigid — not in a way that I ever felt posed a problem for my lenses, but just not being quite as smooth as a Canon adapter is, with there being a little bit of a metal-on-metal feel as you turn the lens into locked position.)

The speed booster comes in a nice little hard-plastic carrying case which looks and feels fine but which I'll probably forego for my camera bag, personally.

The booster comes with a tripod foot attached. It can be removed from the adapter with a little hex key (not included).

Firmware and updating. Like I mentioned, Metabones, unlike Canon, officially supports all RF cameras with their firmware (Canon cameras and the RED Komodo), not just cinema cameras.

In terms of firmware updates, I am pretty reassured by Metabones' track record. They seem to update their products fairly well. This particular RF speed booster has been updated a number of times, in order to correct some firmware compatibility issues that arose on the R5/R6 and C70 when they first came out, as well as to make other tweaks to enhance support for various lenses. (It's worth mentioning that most cameras haven't required adjustments from Metabones in firmware upon release — the R3/R7/R10 didn't for instance — so it's probable that it'll work with the rumored RF cameras at launch.)

The firmware correctly integrates with Canon's menu system. If you go to the screen on your camera to check your firmware version, it'll actually display it (along with the camera and, if applicable, lens firmware version). This showed that my speed booster shipped with firmware 1.8.0 (which is still current). Updates, however, are not installed through the Canon updater, but instead through the Metabones utility on your computer. The firmware can be not only updated, but also downgraded back to an older version if you'd like (the option is officially supported).

The connection is made through a standard Micro-USB cable. I would have preferred USB-C at this point, but Micro-USB is still valid. The speed booster doesn't come with a cable, but you most likely have one already — you just might have to go look for it for a minute if you're now almost entirely on USB-C like I am. The Micro-USB port on the speed booster is covered by a little cap which is easy to take off and put back on but which could probably be easily lost if you left it off.

Interestingly — and this I only learned by reading the firmware update notes — the Metabones adapter includes special firmware support for the 1980s weird Sigma lenses that had a poorly implemented version of the EF protocol and thus don't allow for electronic aperture control on newer Canon bodies ("newer" meaning since like sometime during the 1990s). I happen to own a Sigma 400mm f/5.6 lens from the late 1980s which suffers from this defect (it's an ancient lens, I got it for almost free, and no, it's not optically good but that's besides the point — it's a toy). It works properly on the booster! Amazing!

Use for the intended purpose. The speed booster works successfully on my R5 and R7. It translates the metadata of the lens to the speed-boosted equivalent focal length and aperture, except that it will not lower the f-stop of any lens whose maximum aperture is already f/1.4 or wider. The lenses have full electronic control and autofocus seems to be exactly as it is (no better, no worse) when the lenses are used without the speed booster.

The booster is supported for both stills and video. By default (but see below), the booster will make the lens identify itself as APS-C only, and so the R5 applies the 1.6x crop mode, just like using an EF-S lens on a Canon adapter would.

The booster has a little wheel on it that can be used as an RF control ring (programmed however you want, as usual). The wheel can be pressed in, which is also programmable in-camera (as a lens button). Using the Metabones utility on your computer, you can also set pressing down on the control wheel to set EXIF data you pre-specify, which may be useful if you are using an adapted vintage lens (like with Nikon F-EF on top of EF-RF), or a cinema lens/other full-manual lens with no electronics.

In my testing, the speed booster has worked quite well for both photos and videos, with everything being really quite as you'd expect in normal operation in terms of autofocus/electronic control/etc. The image quality also looks pretty good. Like I said, I have not conducted and form of scientific test. But the images coming from this unit are pretty good. Since the optics are supposed to be the same, perhaps any review of the Metabones 0.71x Ultra Speed Booster on other mounts could provide more potentially useful information.

Also, while I obviously cannot say definitively that there would never be any flare issues, I can say that my tests with backlighting did not produce a purple circle in any backlit situations like described for the Canon and Viltrox speed boosters. Not saying that there couldn't be a flare issue in some situation, but I wasn't able to see any problem with flare myself.

Bonus fun stuff! Ah, but wait, there's more! In the Metabones utility on the desktop, you can check a box to set whether or not the speed booster will force an APS-C crop. By default, it does, but if you uncheck this option, then you can use your camera in full-frame mode with a speed-boosted lens! (The APS-C mode still works exactly as before, but your camera won't automatically switch into it like with the default settings.)

What use is there for this wizardry? Well, it will give you the 0.71x reduced image from your speed booster but on the full sensor of your full-frame camera. You should expect any vignette (as this is effectively attaching a full-frame lens to a camera with what is now an 0.71x crop factor). All the lenses I tested had a significant vignette on the R5 in this mode. But some of them had a bit less than most: the Sigma Art prime lenses were in general better than the other lenses I tested, especially the 50mm and 40mm lenses. You can get significantly more than you bargained for with these lenses in terms of image circle! But do keep in mind that this purpose is really entirely secondary to the main use of the adapter, and it's mostly something you can play with for fun rather than something which produces good images for real use (as you're using the glass for a purpose for which it was not designed, after all).

You may be able to get a simulation of an 0.71x medium format camera using this adapter with another adapter that attaches a medium-format lens to an EF mount. I don't have any medium-format lenses and I don't have such an adapter so I have no actual experience testing that kind of setup. There is also a Kipon speed booster for that purpose (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5VwtZThygs), but I've never used that either.

Conclusion. If you want a speed booster for RF cameras, I think this is a pretty good option. It's certainly worth considering, at least, if you're in the market for that. If you are shooting video (or stills!) on an R7/R10/other future APS-C RF camera, and want closer to full frame FOV and DOF (although not quite the same as what you'd get on FF, to be clear), this speed booster may be for you. If you want to use one of the very nice 4K-crop (or 5K-RAW crop) modes on the full-frame RF cameras, this may be for you, too. If you want to get right about full frame on the C70 or slightly more on a Komodo, this may be what you're looking for. (On the other hand, if you're shooting stills on a FF RF camera, you probably shouldn't buy a speed booster, unless you... really really want to capture your RAWs in 1.6x crop mode for some reason and throw away tons of pixels, or if you really want to get a bit more of the image circle than you're supposed to.)

 antonio-salieri's gear list:antonio-salieri's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A +14 more
Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Superzoom2 Regular Member • Posts: 213
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Thanks so much for the detailed breakdown! I am definitely considering one now!
Did you experience any problems with image stabilization?

OP antonio-salieri Regular Member • Posts: 208
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Superzoom2 wrote:

Thanks so much for the detailed breakdown! I am definitely considering one now!
Did you experience any problems with image stabilization?

Optical image stabilization and IBIS both seem to work correctly with my lenses on the R7. This is in line with Metabones' official site which says that image stabilization is fully supported with the speed booster.

 antonio-salieri's gear list:antonio-salieri's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A +14 more
Superzoom2 Regular Member • Posts: 213
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

antonio-salieri wrote:

Superzoom2 wrote:

Thanks so much for the detailed breakdown! I am definitely considering one now!
Did you experience any problems with image stabilization?

Optical image stabilization and IBIS both seem to work correctly with my lenses on the R7. This is in line with Metabones' official site which says that image stabilization is fully supported with the speed booster.

That's amazing! So other than the theoretical loss of quality through an additional element, the Metabones seems like a no brainer.

I was debating selling my R7 because I'm an occasional portrait photographer and I miss full frame. I'm hoping the quality of the Metabones is good enough for portraits if I use it with my primes on the R7. In particular, I hope it works well with my 35mm 1.4, my 50mm 1.8, my 85mm 1.8, and hopefully my 70-200 2.8 (all Canon, except the 85).

OP antonio-salieri Regular Member • Posts: 208
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Superzoom2 wrote:

That's amazing! So other than the theoretical loss of quality through an additional element, the Metabones seems like a no brainer.

I was debating selling my R7 because I'm an occasional portrait photographer and I miss full frame. I'm hoping the quality of the Metabones is good enough for portraits if I use it with my primes on the R7. In particular, I hope it works well with my 35mm 1.4, my 50mm 1.8, my 85mm 1.8, and hopefully my 70-200 2.8 (all Canon, except the 85).

The loss of IQ on the Metabones Ultra Speed Booster is very minimal, but not quite purely theoretical. Still, it is very minimal. The Metabones Ultra seems to be widely regarded as the best speed booster available (based on the opinions I see online), with better IQ (and build quality) than Viltrox or other cheaper alternatives on other mounts (and the optics are the same).

The Metabones performs noticeably better than the Viltrox in all the comparisons I can see between these boosters. (And the Viltrox isn't available new in EF-RF for now too.)

I haven't seen a direct comparison of the Metabones with the (more expensive) Canon EF-RF speed booster, but the Canon one, as mentioned, doesn't have firmware support for the non-C70 cameras (and people seem to have quibbles with its purple flaring).

While the IQ of the optics is going to be quite good with the Metabones, your R7 will still not be a full-frame camera. Although you've shrunken the image circle down, your photosites are still smaller (and so your sensor still won't be quite as good in certain ways vs. a full-frame sensor). And you will have a 1.14x crop factor still, so your lenses (translating back to full-frame equivalency) will be like: 40mm f/1.6, 57mm f/2, 97mm f/2 and 80-230mm f/3.2. (Those will not be the APS-C equivalents, though, so don't get confused by that.)

Also, I have the 50mm f/1.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8 and they both work on this adapter so you should have no problems.

 antonio-salieri's gear list:antonio-salieri's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A +14 more
Superzoom2 Regular Member • Posts: 213
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Thanks again for all the valuable info! I'm pretty sure I'm going to get it!

Swerky Contributing Member • Posts: 793
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

Hello. I’m planning on replacing my full frame DSLR with a mirrorless body while adapting my lenses. I first considered getting an R6 with adapter, but that option might still be too expensive for me. Then I thought of the R7 with a speed booster. I’d save myself a few hundred bucks and possibly get better battery life from the R7.

I looked on the forum before asking the question and found your informative thread.
Reading the comments, are you saying that the speed booster won’t give the exact focal length as on full frame? Say I have a 24-105 lens, with the speed booster on R7 it will have longer equivalent viewing angles?
And about the bonus fun stuff, I wish you said that there’s an option to keep the lens projecting its native full frame circle unto the APS-C sensor, making a 100mm lens a 160 for example like on a regular adapter, but that’s not even possible given there are optics in the way.
Any clarification concerning the question above is appreciated.
I also found this second more expensive speed booster from metabones. Perhaps a newer one? Seems to do the same thing.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1682914-REG/metabones_mbspef_efr_bt2_canon_ef_lens_to.html/overview

-- hide signature --

Nothing to read here.

 Swerky's gear list:Swerky's gear list
Canon G1 X III Canon EOS 6D Fujifilm X-A10 Voigtlander 20mm F3.5 Color Skopar SL II Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO-Lanthar SL II +1 more
OP antonio-salieri Regular Member • Posts: 208
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review
1

Swerky wrote:

Hello. I’m planning on replacing my full frame DSLR with a mirrorless body while adapting my lenses. I first considered getting an R6 with adapter, but that option might still be too expensive for me. Then I thought of the R7 with a speed booster. I’d save myself a few hundred bucks and possibly get better battery life from the R7.

Especially with the R6ii coming out, the R6+adapter should probably be pretty close in price to the R7+booster. Of course the R6 would be using FF lenses as a true FF camera and without optics (even good ones) in the way. The speed booster can't be used on RF lenses, so the FF sensor may benefit you there too. The R7 has a higher-resolution sensor and can be used for significantly more reach. And there are other differences too. You'll have to compare your options.

I looked on the forum before asking the question and found your informative thread.
Reading the comments, are you saying that the speed booster won’t give the exact focal length as on full frame? Say I have a 24-105 lens, with the speed booster on R7 it will have longer equivalent viewing angles?

Yes. It reduces the crop factor from 1.6 to 1.14, as indicated on the chart. That's much closer to the FF viewing angle, but not quite the same.

And about the bonus fun stuff, I wish you said that there’s an option to keep the lens projecting its native full frame circle unto the APS-C sensor, making a 100mm lens a 160 for example like on a regular adapter, but that’s not even possible given there are optics in the way.

The speed booster always shrinks the image circle to 0.71 times its original size. The option controls whether a FF camera will lock itself into 1.6x (APS-C) crop mode or allow use of the full sensor (which is virtually always bigger than the circle that ends up getting projected after it is shrunken). On an APS-C camera, this is irrelevant, because you only have an APS-C sensor in the first place. A full-frame lens used on the speed booster will always cover your entire APS-C sensor.

It is not possible to use a setting in firmware to change the booster's optics. If you want to use a lens with the 1.6 crop factor, you should use the standard adapter with no optics.

Any clarification concerning the question above is appreciated.
I also found this second more expensive speed booster from metabones. Perhaps a newer one? Seems to do the same thing.

This is a variant of the same adapter with a positive locking mechanism (you need to unlock the mount to put on or take off a lens). This is something some videographers appreciate. The optics and firmware of the speed boosters are exactly the same.

 antonio-salieri's gear list:antonio-salieri's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R7 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A +14 more
Swerky Contributing Member • Posts: 793
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

antonio-salieri wrote:

Swerky wrote:

Hello. I’m planning on replacing my full frame DSLR with a mirrorless body while adapting my lenses. I first considered getting an R6 with adapter, but that option might still be too expensive for me. Then I thought of the R7 with a speed booster. I’d save myself a few hundred bucks and possibly get better battery life from the R7.

Especially with the R6ii coming out, the R6+adapter should probably be pretty close in price to the R7+booster. Of course the R6 would be using FF lenses as a true FF camera and without optics (even good ones) in the way. The speed booster can't be used on RF lenses, so the FF sensor may benefit you there too. The R7 has a higher-resolution sensor and can be used for significantly more reach. And there are other differences too. You'll have to compare your options.

I looked on the forum before asking the question and found your informative thread.
Reading the comments, are you saying that the speed booster won’t give the exact focal length as on full frame? Say I have a 24-105 lens, with the speed booster on R7 it will have longer equivalent viewing angles?

Yes. It reduces the crop factor from 1.6 to 1.14, as indicated on the chart. That's much closer to the FF viewing angle, but not quite the same.

And about the bonus fun stuff, I wish you said that there’s an option to keep the lens projecting its native full frame circle unto the APS-C sensor, making a 100mm lens a 160 for example like on a regular adapter, but that’s not even possible given there are optics in the way.

The speed booster always shrinks the image circle to 0.71 times its original size. The option controls whether a FF camera will lock itself into 1.6x (APS-C) crop mode or allow use of the full sensor (which is virtually always bigger than the circle that ends up getting projected after it is shrunken). On an APS-C camera, this is irrelevant, because you only have an APS-C sensor in the first place. A full-frame lens used on the speed booster will always cover your entire APS-C sensor.

It is not possible to use a setting in firmware to change the booster's optics. If you want to use a lens with the 1.6 crop factor, you should use the standard adapter with no optics.

Any clarification concerning the question above is appreciated.
I also found this second more expensive speed booster from metabones. Perhaps a newer one? Seems to do the same thing.

This is a variant of the same adapter with a positive locking mechanism (you need to unlock the mount to put on or take off a lens). This is something some videographers appreciate. The optics and firmware of the speed boosters are exactly the same.

Thanks for the info! An R6 with regular adapter goes for 2400. While an R7 with speedbooster would settle me some 2000, 1980 exactly. But since the speedbooster won't give me the same lens viewing angles as on full frame, then it won't work for me.

-- hide signature --

Nothing to read here.

 Swerky's gear list:Swerky's gear list
Canon G1 X III Canon EOS 6D Fujifilm X-A10 Voigtlander 20mm F3.5 Color Skopar SL II Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO-Lanthar SL II +1 more
thebear1207 New Member • Posts: 1
Re: Metabones EF-RF Speed Booster: non-scientific review

hello

I use Canon 0.71x speedbooster with my Canon R7

when I use EF 24-70mm f2.8, ibis will not work properly when the focal length is lower 24mm

I try another lens EF 16-35mm f2.8, focal length lower 16mm have same problam

metabones speedbooster have same problam?

if not, I'll I replace metabones!

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads