DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions
ShootingD60 Senior Member • Posts: 1,353
EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

-- hide signature --

I have a white lens (thanks to Tippex !)

Aoi Usagi Veteran Member • Posts: 3,221
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
2

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

Canon are transitioning to the RF mount.  There are only a handful of EF lenses still being produced.  But there are many people still using them.

BlueRay2 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
4

Aoi Usagi wrote:

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

Canon are transitioning to the RF mount. There are only a handful of EF lenses still being produced. But there are many people still using them.

Millions of them are being used to this day but canon is concentrating mostly on RF lenses. so, the EF production will slowly come to a halt till it is forgotten. if you have "L" lenses, i'd hang on to them but if you starting from scratch, then getting RF would be a better option.

-- hide signature --

The eye sees all but the mind shows us what we want. w, Shakespeare

Scott Larson Veteran Member • Posts: 7,505
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
2

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

 Scott Larson's gear list:Scott Larson's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Canon EOS-1D X +17 more
Aoi Usagi Veteran Member • Posts: 3,221
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

Canon is going all in and heavily invested with the mirrorless RF mount. They need new consumers as well as existing ones to buy more of their products, as well as getting pressured by the stock holders to make a mirrorless camera. They know who will buy into it and who wont (yet). Right now, Canon make various adapters to use EF and EF-S mount lenses to work flawlessly with the RF mount, to make the transition easier for consumers. I would not be surprised if Canon stopped making the adapters within a few years so that buyer will have no choice but to purchase new RF lenses.

I also assume that mirrorless cameras are cheaper to manufacture.  No more mirror mechanism, expensive prisms, and the problems associated with a separate and dedicated AF module.  No more fine tuning the AF (micro AF adjustment) and the complaints associated with it.  If there is a problem (and I did read somewhere on this forum about AF issues with mirrorless) it can be fixed with a simple firmware update.

Canon_Guy
Canon_Guy Senior Member • Posts: 1,489
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

There is much more EF mount lens models (not only Canon) being sold now than RF, so EF still makes a lot of sense.

 Canon_Guy's gear list:Canon_Guy's gear list
Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG HSM Art Sigma 105mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM +6 more
Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,413
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

Aoi Usagi wrote:

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

Canon is going all in and heavily invested with the mirrorless RF mount. They need new consumers as well as existing ones to buy more of their products, as well as getting pressured by the stock holders to make a mirrorless camera. They know who will buy into it and who wont (yet). Right now, Canon make various adapters to use EF and EF-S mount lenses to work flawlessly with the RF mount, to make the transition easier for consumers. I would not be surprised if Canon stopped making the adapters within a few years so that buyer will have no choice but to purchase new RF lenses.

I would be surprised if Canon stopped making the adapters from choice. It would only happen if everybody who did not already have an adapter deserted EF lenses and they could not sell enough adapters to keep the production line working. At the moment there are at least half a dozen different EF - EOS R mount adapters being made by other manufacturers, so Canon not making one wouldn't help them sell more RF lenses.

I also assume that mirrorless cameras are cheaper to manufacture. No more mirror mechanism, expensive prisms, and the problems associated with a separate and dedicated AF module. No more fine tuning the AF (micro AF adjustment) and the complaints associated with it. If there is a problem (and I did read somewhere on this forum about AF issues with mirrorless) it can be fixed with a simple firmware update.

There is the cost of providing the EVF.  A lot of room for improvement there, both in quality and cost.

neilt3
neilt3 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,011
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

It's not a strange or unknown strategy for Canon .

In the 80's they dropped their FD mount manual focus gear in favour of the EF Autofocus gear and it worked out for them .

It hacked a load of their loyal user's off who dumped Canon when they changed to AF cameras but it clearly was a new market that they were looking for then , I would say it's the same now .

At least this time an adapter is available to retain full function with your EF lenses so they should retain more value than the FD gear did when they brought out the EOS range .

 neilt3's gear list:neilt3's gear list
Minolta DiMAGE 7 Minolta DiMAGE 7Hi Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A200 +68 more
Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,413
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

neilt3 wrote:

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

It's not a strange or unknown strategy for Canon .

In the 80's they dropped their FD mount manual focus gear in favour of the EF Autofocus gear and it worked out for them .

I remember it well. They introduced the EF mount in 1987, their last FD lens was released due to popular demand in 1989; a year after its EF equivalent was released.

It hacked a load of their loyal user's off who dumped Canon when they changed to AF cameras but it clearly was a new market that they were looking for then , I would say it's the same now .

But it was the collapse of FD lens sales due to the overwhelming attractions of autofocus that did for FD. The FD mount Canon T60 released in 1990 sank almost without trace. The trouble with being a loyal user is that the market is fickle.

At least this time an adapter is available to retain full function with your EF lenses so they should retain more value than the FD gear did when they brought out the EOS range .

We can hope. EF lenses are adaptable to just about every mirrorless camera sold, not to mention professional video cameras, while FD lenses were almost unusable on new cameras until 2010-12 when the E and EF-M mounts arrived.

Scott Larson Veteran Member • Posts: 7,505
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

neilt3 wrote:

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

It's not a strange or unknown strategy for Canon .

So are AF systems that don't track and mirrors that fall off.

In the 80's they dropped their FD mount manual focus gear in favour of the EF Autofocus gear and it worked out for them .

If I remember correctly, Canon continued to manufacture FD lenses for a long time after the EF mount was introduced.

 Scott Larson's gear list:Scott Larson's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Canon EOS-1D X +17 more
Mark B.
Mark B. Forum Pro • Posts: 29,756
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

Not really strange at all, that's how it works with technology products.

Scott Larson Veteran Member • Posts: 7,505
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

Mark B. wrote:

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

Not really strange at all, that's how it works with technology products.

Companies stop selling products even though there is a demand for them? Good news for Sony I guess.

 Scott Larson's gear list:Scott Larson's gear list
Sony RX10 IV Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Canon EOS-1D X +17 more
Igor Sotelo Contributing Member • Posts: 923
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Not sure how would a pro think, but for me EF makes sense. I would need a small fortune for a similar RF system.

Perhaps would buy an RF body and adapter to test some things, and complement the EF system. One RF body and polarizer adapter is probably less cumbersome and expensive than having polarizers for each lens. The RF body could shot 4K if I ever wanted to. The body could have IBIS or very high fps rates. Or add more advanced AF capabilities.

I think have the majority of the EF lenses I wanted, but still have some that would like to add to the system.

 Igor Sotelo's gear list:Igor Sotelo's gear list
Nikon D800 Canon EOS 6D Nikon Df Canon EOS 5DS Sony a7R II +35 more
Mark B.
Mark B. Forum Pro • Posts: 29,756
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Scott Larson wrote:

Mark B. wrote:

Scott Larson wrote:

There are far more EF mount cameras than RF mount cameras in use so it's strange business to stop producing products for the larger market at this point.

Not really strange at all, that's how it works with technology products.

Companies stop selling products even though there is a demand for them? Good news for Sony I guess.

Canon is of course still producing DSLRs and EF lenses, but they will taper off as there are more R products introduced.  Already Canon has stopped supporting older products by making no longer repairable.

Erick 21
Erick 21 Regular Member • Posts: 121
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Hi, the EF range is being sunsetted by Canon. I guess they don't want to keep two lens mounts running for R&D & production.

There are still third party manufacturers (Samyang, Tokina, etc.) who are still manufacturing great EF mount lenses. The EF mount is also still going strong in the cinema sector, although some RF camera mounts are creeping in.

I myself use an EOS R and a Blackmagic 6K Pro for filming, which has an EF mount. For this reason, I am still using EF lenses I can swap between the two systems. I also use a 0.71X adapter for the EOSR to bring the crop down for shooting in 4K, which doesn't work with RF lenses.   4K on the EOSR otherwise has a massive crop with RF lenses.

The R5C might have made me change my mind, if it wasn't for its very high price point.

 Erick 21's gear list:Erick 21's gear list
Sony ZV-1 Canon EOS R Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM +7 more
djphil Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

Pretty sure that EF mount is dead. Canon might just keep DSLR's alive, but they will probably change the mount if they do another DSLR. Why? They'll update DSLR's to do all the things mirrorless cameras are doing. And they'll probably update the pinout to match RF, and possibly change everything else to match RF too. So yeah, EF will die, but, DSLRs might just live on.

Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,413
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
4

djphil wrote:

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

Pretty sure that EF mount is dead. Canon might just keep DSLR's alive, but they will probably change the mount if they do another DSLR. Why? They'll update DSLR's to do all the things mirrorless cameras are doing. And they'll probably update the pinout to match RF,

No they won't change the mount, because nobody in their right mind would buy it. And I can't see Canon relaunching a new range of DSLRs with a brand new mount.

and possibly change everything else to match RF too. So yeah, EF will die, but, DSLRs might just live on.

With all the video cameras that use EF, the mount could survive the DSLR. But it would be a niche product, all the same.

mstMuc
mstMuc Regular Member • Posts: 103
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?
1

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

canon produces stuff that sells well. But since EF lenses aren’t rare second hand and fully supported by R cameras EF is far away  from being dead.

djphil Junior Member • Posts: 28
Re: EF, a past master or a passed master ?

Sittatunga wrote:

djphil wrote:

ShootingD60 wrote:

Hi, It's been a while since I've been on the site but having watched a review of the BlackMagic blah blah 6K G whatever they did mention that Canon are producing fewer EF mount lenses ? So, is EF dead ?

Pretty sure that EF mount is dead. Canon might just keep DSLR's alive, but they will probably change the mount if they do another DSLR. Why? They'll update DSLR's to do all the things mirrorless cameras are doing. And they'll probably update the pinout to match RF,

No they won't change the mount, because nobody in their right mind would buy it. And I can't see Canon relaunching a new range of DSLRs with a brand new mount.

Probably true. It does seem that technology will solve most of the "problems" that make DSLRs look good. A big one is power usage. A DSLR can theoretically run much longer with the same battery. But, most likely batteries will just keep getting better. And CPU's will keep getting more efficient, etc. Even so, there still could be an ultra long life DSLR camera, maybe it can take like 10,000 shots on one battery. But then thinking about things like AF and IBIS, it seems unlikely. Would probably have to scrap all the tech goodies and make a barebones machine, most likely something the market would hate. And it might end up with wildly different battery life depending on the lenses used, would be a nightmare for consumers who have to have every little thing explained to them in absolute perfect detail in order to comprehend how something works.

and possibly change everything else to match RF too. So yeah, EF will die, but, DSLRs might just live on.

With all the video cameras that use EF, the mount could survive the DSLR. But it would be a niche product, all the same.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads