Re: Half in Water, Half out of Water Shots
1
I went down the underwater photography rabbithole this summer—including half under- half above-water shots.
I use a TG6 for my higher quality/carefully planned shots and for stills, and a GoPro 10 mostly for video and for those half/half shots.
The cheapest way to do the half/half shots, according to my research at least, is a GoPro with a third party Dome (I use Telesin, ~$50, done!) I find the quality of shots from this combo more than adequate. The GoPro 10 has good burst shot options—which is important for this kind of shot as you will never pull the shutter at the precise moment you want.
I also shoot fish while snorkeling and they can be very skittish and honestly I am a little undecided which cam is best for this purpose. You see, the TG6 WILL capture the best underwater images of fish etc. But it takes a little bit of work and planning. This is hard when you are 1) freedoving 2) chasing skittish jumpy flighty fish and 3) operating in murky water where you cant see much farther than 4-5 feet in front of you.
Those above 3 conditions mean that I often find a GoPro mounted forward on an extension pole can be super helpful in getting close to the fish. They are not as afraid of a gopro on a stick as they are of my hand with a camera. I havent researched if it would be more costly to make a similar rig for the tg6 but it probably would. I shoot video this way and then extract still frames from it after containing my fish.
All that said, I ansolutely LOVE the TG6 too. The underwater macro mode is something I use a lot and the flash is VERY important underwater. It really improves the pictures. If I am able to get the camera in range of the target fish and they stay still long enough for a still photo, the TG6 will produce stunning pictures. The burst mode is a little slower than the gopro and is very very slow witj the flash unfortunately. I dont know why they could not set up a fast pulsing flash on it. The camera captures way more colors and detail than the gopro can, and I am doubtful that a mirrorless dslr etc would do better. You can use the TG6 and gopro with no housing for snorkeling depths.
Both are great and I really love both. If getting only one Id get the tg6, but if you must have a dome and want it cheap, get both (a done for the tg6 will cost what a gopro will afaik and the gopro domes are negligible cost). The gopro is also (obviously) great for capturing action—I use it boogie boarding and for selfies swimming and kayaking and plan to also use it biking and skiing.
As I said superior mirrrorless etc cams deliver deminishing returns in this area. It is my assessment that after you have a TG6 or even a GoPro the MAIN limiting factor will NOT be your camera anymore for underwater photography—unless you are doing photography in circumstances where you have LOTS of time to compose your shots (scuba, still subjects). Instead the limiting factor will be trying to find ways to calm your subjects so they can be captured with any camera, dealing with low visibility underwater, etc.
So I vote the cheap route for UW photography. Also if your mirrorless is your main camera and it is not weather sealed, I wouldnt put it jn a housing as you might splash it a lot when removing the housing. You can take AMAZING shots with the TG6, and amazing half/halfs on the cheap with a GoPro and a dome.
If you just want cheap half/halfs and dont care about getting good shots of fish and this is not your specialty (all of which you said), just get a GoPro and a Telesin (or similar) dome and be done. You will have a lot of fun with that combo and the gopro is a great action and even vlogging camera too so it has a lot of versatility. The cost is low and you dont risk damaging more expensive gear. Get it before summer ends so you can squeeze in some good shots before rhe water is too cold.