DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Using newer lenses on the A-1

Started 10 months ago | Discussions
Todd G. Contributing Member • Posts: 970
Using newer lenses on the A-1

Can I use EF and EF-S lenses on the 35mm A-1 body?

If so, with an adapter?

-- hide signature --

Todd
The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.
-Dorothea Lange

 Todd G.'s gear list:Todd G.'s gear list
Olympus C-2100 UZ Canon G9 X II Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM +1 more
Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,413
Not even theoretically possible.
3

Todd G. wrote:

Can I use EF and EF-S lenses on the 35mm A-1 body?

If so, with an adapter?

No. Even if somebody could machine or print an adapter, it wouldn't let the lenses focus on infinity (as the EF bayonet lugs won't fit inside the throat of the FD mount), and the camera can't supply power to the lens to work the iris, the stabilisation or the powered focussing of a lot of them. EF-S lenses won't cover the entire film format and can't physically be mounted on an EF mount film camera.

You're limited to New FD, FD and FL lenses without an adapter. The FL lenses won't allow Tv automation and require stopped down metering. Canon made Exakta, M42 and Nikon F lens to FD mount adapters, there may be third-party adapters for other lenses too, but it's been 32 years since Canon last introduced an FD lens.

John Crowe
John Crowe Veteran Member • Posts: 3,476
Theoretically yes, but no aperture control.
4

Theoretically yes. There is 2mm of room to introduce an adapter to allow infinity focus.  However, no one makes an adapter.

However there would be no control over aperture. There are one or two ways to mount the EF lens to an EF body and lock the aperture to the desired setting for mounting onto the FD body. I considered building a medium format body for my 17 TS-E and this is was one of the reasons I abandoned the idea.

I know the FD bodies would provide the best possible viewfinder, but you are immensely better off with an EF film body.

 John Crowe's gear list:John Crowe's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 1.4x Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D +15 more
OP Todd G. Contributing Member • Posts: 970
Re: Theoretically yes, but no aperture control.

John,

Do you believe I would be better off with a film EF lens body due to having more lens choices?

-- hide signature --

Todd
The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.
-Dorothea Lange

 Todd G.'s gear list:Todd G.'s gear list
Olympus C-2100 UZ Canon G9 X II Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM +1 more
Sittatunga Veteran Member • Posts: 5,413
Re: Theoretically yes, but no aperture control.
1

Todd G. wrote:

John,

Do you believe I would be better off with a film EF lens body due to having more lens choices?

Apart from not being able to use FD or Pentax K lenses, yes, you would. Generally the older EOS film cameras are dirt cheap; I paid £1 for a working EOS 650 at a Cash Generator and that included a ratty but working 35-80mm lens. Obviously I paid a lot more for the battery and the film...

You'll need an EF lens to use P or Tv modes, but Av mode will work with any lens you can adapt to an EOS 35mm film camera - beware of Pentax K or M lenses though as the iris lever will almost certainly clash with the mirror and the adapters should by rights be labelled 'K to EF-S' not 'K to EF'. You won't be able to mount EF-S lenses, they're designed to work with crop sensor DSLRs and many of them have rear elements that would clash with the mirror were you foolish enough to modify the lens to fit a film camera.

John Crowe
John Crowe Veteran Member • Posts: 3,476
Re: Theoretically yes, but no aperture control.
1

There are some very good FD lenses that can compete with EF lenses, but yes there are far more choices, and some much improved lenses, in EF mount.  I have also adapted a great many Nikon manual lenses to EOS as well.

Of course the better EF lenses are more expensive than FD counterparts.

You also get the possible benefit of AF.

The only real advantage of the A-1 is the viewfinder for quick manual focusing compared to EOS.

So it really depends on how you intend to use your film camera and what focal length lenses you are interested in using.

Also be aware of the cost of film, processing, and printing in your area.  I am in a rural area and the costs are too prohibitive.

 John Crowe's gear list:John Crowe's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 1.4x Venus Laowa 12mm F2.8 Zero-D +15 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads