alcelc
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 19,005
Re: Travel with 2 small bodies, lens recommendation help
1
I always recommend traveler to carry 2 bodies, specially for trips of their life time.
Not necessary to avoid swap lenses, but one main camera and one backup could ensure we can keep on shooting if accident will happen to the main camera.
I had learnt my lesson. I had carried 2 cameras with me in a trip, but the backup is a compact and I never used it seriously. While my main camera was out of service, I was frustrated with the backup camera which was close to useless.
Currently I have G85/GX85 be my main camera, GX850 is my back up and for selfie.
Pad-Thai-101 wrote:
Hello all,
I am thinking about moving from Sony FE system to m4/3 and plan to have 2 small bodies and small lenses for Traveling. Since I don’t like to switch lenses and want to travel light.
- I plan to have an Olympus Pen-F, but it’s hard to find a used one on eBay and/or the E-P7 which I don’t think they sell in the USA. So I am thinking about an Olympus E-PL9 and an Panasonic GX9. Is it too confusing to have 2 different brands?
Could be, specially if you are not familiar with either system yet...
- I thought I lease I have the flip screen from E-PL9 and EVF from GX9.
GX9 does not only has a tilt-able evf (for low angle shooting), it also has a flip LCD.
- One body might be paired with a Wide angle lens, still not sure what to get between Olympus 9-18mm or the preorder the Panasonic 9mm 1.7
- Second body I'd like to Pair with Panasonic 20mm 1.7 which I like its small form factor. Hopefully I can detach the body and lens and put in different pants pockets if I want to.
- This is my headache, what is a decent travel Telephoto lens. Thinking about Panasonic 45-200mm or 40-150mm (Pana/Oly) or any recommendation? I don't mind if it's slow, but prefer it small, light and sharp enough.
I would avoid 45-200. This is not a very bad lens but has to stop down to f/7.1~f/8 for the sharpest. So please consider this:
- The balancing of this relatively long and heavy lens (vs GX9 or the smaller size M43 cameras),
- the required shutter speed to stabilized an eq AoV of 400mm,
- f/7.1~f/8 for the best,
- this is also known to suffer from shutter shock so it is safer to use e-shutter.
So you could imagine this lens has quite high demanding on the lighting condition.
I eventually replace 45-200 by the 45-150. Although 45-150 is shorter, the different is usually around 1 or 2 steps only vs the 200. 45-150 is shorter and lighter (only 200g) so more portable and has better balancing on smaller size cameras. It is also very sharp on wide open.
Alternatively if you prefer an internal zoom lens and could operate the zoom by wifi remotely, might also consider the 45-175PZ, which has similar IQ of 45-150 at a few US$ more only.
- from no.5, should I even go with the Olympus macro 60mm or 75mm to cover the semi-telephoto range.
Not a prime guy so can't comment on this. 60 could be useful for macro shooting whereas 75 is a good focal length for portrait.
Sorry for my poor English and Thank you in advance
Pad-Thai
I might also suggest the 14-140 f/3.5-5.6 mk-II. Paring it up with 9 or 20 f/1.7 could be a good combo for most general shooting. This 10x zoom lens can reduce lens swapping, has IQ close to my 12-35 f/2.8 on the short end, and is marginally better than 45-150 on the long end, and is not very large (similar length as 45-150) nor heavy (only 265g).
My 2 cents.
-- hide signature --
Albert
** Please forgive my typo error.
** Please feel free to download my image and edit it as you like **