DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

One image; three 3D conversions

Started 11 months ago | Discussions
uuglypher
uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
One image; three 3D conversions

Please compare and contrast, and state your preference, if you have one.

I would appreciate as many objective observations and opinions as possible.

Many thanks,

Dave

-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Brian F Flint
Brian F Flint Regular Member • Posts: 184
Re: One image; three 3D conversions

The top pair has some sort of depth in places , in general it seems to be a poor stereo pair whether viewed in parallel of cross-view.

The other two pairs both hurt my eyes when trying to view them.

 Brian F Flint's gear list:Brian F Flint's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 Sony RX10 III Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.5 1-5x Macro
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: One image; three 3D conversions

Thanks, Brian, for looking and commenting.

Dave

-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Turbguy1
MOD Turbguy1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,467
Re: One image; three 3D conversions

Parallel view, right?

The top image has some "fusable" depth (in small sizes)

The other two cause me eyestrain, difficult to fuse, even with small sizes.

What do YOU see??

-- hide signature --
 Turbguy1's gear list:Turbguy1's gear list
Minolta DiMAGE 7 Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Nikon D300 +3 more
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: One image; three 3D conversions

Turbguy1 wrote:

Parallel view, right?

The top image has some "fusable" depth (in small sizes)

The other two cause me eyestrain, difficult to fuse, even with small sizes.

What do YOU see??

I find all 3 equally comfortable and easy to fuse. To my visual apparatus the first and third are essentially equal in the full extent of discernible depths from foreground to horizon. The second example is, by comparison , scant in, but not devoid of discernible depths.

Dave

-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads