DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.

Started 10 months ago | Questions
thunder storm Forum Pro • Posts: 10,139
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.

electronicsenthusiast wrote:

Mr F48 wrote:

Quarkcharmed wrote:

electronicsenthusiast wrote:

Quarkcharmed wrote:

Are you on the most recent firmware? There was a bug where the first shot in a series could be blurry because of IBIS. It was fixed at some point.

Overall, electronic shutter on the R6 and the R5 has a very limited use IMHO and is not recommended as a default shooting mode as it has too many limitations. It's best to be used in special cases such as when you actually need the silent shutter or high speed continuous shooting etc.

I used v1.5.2, including while shooting these samples, which is the most current as of 3/17/22, and even today.

I will default to the mechanical shutter.

The mechanical shutter will cause shutter shock at the shutter speeds you were using in your photos posted in this thread. Electronic first curtain shutter is the default one.

Can confirm, unfortunately.

My R lived in mechanical shutter mode, since the issue was not nearly as prevalent. With the R6, I have to use 1st curtain below 1/200 or limit the auto ISO to a minimum of 1/200

😲

With my R5 @ 105mm I'm fine at 1/250th, so that's the minimum shutter speed for the C-mode for Av + full mechanical shutter. I use that C mode when shooting at wide apertures.

-- hide signature --

45 is more than enough, but 500.000 isn't

 thunder storm's gear list:thunder storm's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Sony a7 IV Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM +24 more
Bas Hamstra Senior Member • Posts: 2,070
Re: Shutter shock

Toothwalker wrote:

Bas Hamstra wrote:

Double image is a tell tale sign of shutter shock. In fact the shutter shock may interact with the image stabilization in a bad way. This looks a lot like the first generations of MFT camera's that suffered from this. I had my share of it with the EPL-1 until I decided to turn image stabilzation off. Like totally and always. That got rid of most of the issues.

I mean the shutter is open before the take and then in an *instant* it must CLOSE-OPEN-CLOSE and this causes a really really hefty vibration. A shockwave.

I am not sure that SS is causing your issues, but it's a possibility. Could you try to turn off IS (just as an exeriment) and see if that makes a difference?

Kind regards,

Bas

I did test with IS turned off before, and the issue disappeared. Certainly when using a tripod. For handheld photography there is of course the increased risk of blur due to regular camera shake.

I use the first curtain electronic shutter by default, which shouldn't cause as hefty a shockwave was the mechanical shutter. And even if the shutter plays a role, it should not affect the first image of a series more than subsequent ones - or should it?

Here are two test images to illustrate the issue. They are raw files converted to JPEG with DPP - without any sharpening or other post-processing.

Electronic first curtain *should* take care of most of it. But 500mm at 1/80s? That's not a good example I would say, though IS has gotten better it still works "statistically", there will be a statistical improvement but you can't expect it to work perfect for each and every shot. Which is happening here.

Anyway shutter shock is mostly bound to certain shutter speeds, for older gens MFT it was 1/160 where nearly all of the trouble was. Time and again I would notice a double (ghost) image, check the shutter speed and always find it was close to 1/160. Are you seeing that strong correlation too?

Bas

 Bas Hamstra's gear list:Bas Hamstra's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 6D Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus E-M1 II Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM +11 more
ThrillaMozilla Veteran Member • Posts: 7,665
Re: Shutter shock

If it's shutter shock, it should be fairly easily reproducible.

It would also help to know which way the shutter travels.  It's easy to find out just by panning on a subject with vertical lines.  This problem starts at the bottom of the image.

 ThrillaMozilla's gear list:ThrillaMozilla's gear list
Canon EOS Rebel SL1 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
Toothwalker Junior Member • Posts: 39
Re: Shutter shock

Bas Hamstra wrote:

Electronic first curtain *should* take care of most of it. But 500mm at 1/80s? That's not a good example I would say, though IS has gotten better it still works "statistically", there will be a statistical improvement but you can't expect it to work perfect for each and every shot. Which is happening here.

Anyway shutter shock is mostly bound to certain shutter speeds, for older gens MFT it was 1/160 where nearly all of the trouble was. Time and again I would notice a double (ghost) image, check the shutter speed and always find it was close to 1/160. Are you seeing that strong correlation too?

500 mm at 1/80 s is not the most convincing example, but it is one of the few that I kept. It also happens at shorter shutter speeds, and with several lenses. My experiences are similar to those of the OP.

If shutter shock is part of the equation, I don't see why it would affect only the first image of a series.

Keeping the camera and lens still for a few seconds, before taking the first shot, does not help. I see good stabilization in the viewfinder, but when I take the picture I occasionally notice a sudden shift of the viewfinder image, as if the IS system is taken by surprise.

OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Shutter shock

If shutter shock is part of the equation, I don't see why it would affect only the first image of a series.

Keeping the camera and lens still for a few seconds, before taking the first shot, does not help. I see good stabilization in the viewfinder, but when I take the picture I occasionally notice a sudden shift of the viewfinder image, as if the IS system is taken by surprise.

I have noticed the same. I can’t think of an image that was not first in a series.

Thank you for mentioning the visible shake, that may be why I always follow up shots for these images.

OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

I found this article describing the issue. First image in the series is what I have noticed as well;  I most commonly see the problem with shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/200.

https://www.diyphotography.net/ibis-bug-reported-in-the-canon-eos-r5-r6/

juanmaasecas Senior Member • Posts: 1,498
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

electronicsenthusiast wrote:

I found this article describing the issue. First image in the series is what I have noticed as well; I most commonly see the problem with shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/200.

https://www.diyphotography.net/ibis-bug-reported-in-the-canon-eos-r5-r6/

I’m the one that reported that issue and thankfully Canon fixed the issue in a firmware update some time ago, at least in my R5. And my problem was visible only at slow shutter speeds.

The pictures shown by the OP here show a much more obvious issue. I can speculate for it being related to a bad synchronisation between ibis and the lens IS. 
My only Lens with IS is a Tamron 35-150 f2.8-4, and I noticed that ibis is not really working with this lens, and I can shoot at much slower shutter speeds with others lenses in the range only using ibis than with this Tamron with its VC system. 
I think, maybe EF Canon lenses try to use ibis together with IBIS, but maybe the firmware is not well optimised as for native RF lenses for both stabilisation systems to work together.

 juanmaasecas's gear list:juanmaasecas's gear list
Canon EOS M50 Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art +4 more
Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr. Senior Member • Posts: 1,169
Any developments?
1

Did you send the camera to Canon for repairs? What is the outcome of your inquire?

Thanks,

Armando

-- hide signature --

'Heavens declare the glory of God,' and I hope my pictures will too.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arodri3/

 Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list:Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list
Canon EOS-1D X Canon 6D Mark II Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM +4 more
OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Any developments?
2

Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr. wrote:

Did you send the camera to Canon for repairs? What is the outcome of your inquire?

Thanks,

Armando

The camera is with Canon now. Hope to hear something soon. The repair facility was closed for 5 days over the holiday weekend.

OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

UPDATE

Canon was not able to duplicate the issue with the camera alone and requested the EF/RF adapter and the EF 16-35mm f/4.0 IS to test.

Canon speculates it is a lens element issue / focus issue. That comment is disconcerting, as the sample images clearly show motion blur, not a focus issue, and the lens is consistently sharp, unless part time, when IBIS is active.

Although the severity of the issue is more pronounced at wider focal lengths, the issue is present on RF lenses as well. Waiting to hear back...

Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr. Senior Member • Posts: 1,169
Thanks for keeping us posted (No Text = NT))
1
-- hide signature --

'Heavens declare the glory of God,' and I hope my pictures will too.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arodri3/

 Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list:Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list
Canon EOS-1D X Canon 6D Mark II Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM +4 more
PicPocket Veteran Member • Posts: 5,897
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

electronicsenthusiast wrote:

UPDATE

Thanks. I'm keen to follow the outcome

the issue is present on RF lenses as well.

If you can showcase that, specific lens issue theory can't explain it.

I guess the first step is for Canon to reproduce it in any setup. Till then it's hard

-- hide signature --
 PicPocket's gear list:PicPocket's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +16 more
OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

If you can showcase that, specific lens issue theory can't explain it.

Here are three examples of what I believe are blur from the image stabilization system. At these shutter speeds, fairly significant. Note the shot at the Vatican. The top of the frame is clear, but not the bottom. Taken with the RF 24-70mm f/2.8

OP electronicsenthusiast Junior Member • Posts: 43
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
4

Canon's response:

R6: Your product has been examined and it was found that the product performed according to specifications. Recalibrated dual pixel AF with included adapter and recalibrated IBIS. Product functions were confirmed.

RF to EF adapter: Your product has been examined and it was found that the mount assembly was out of position causing the focus to operate improperly. The mount assembly has replaced. Product functions were confirmed.

EF 16-35mm f/4.0: Your product has been examined and it was found that the adjustment was out of specifications causing the unit to focus behind the indented subject. The best focus adjustment was carried out on the lens assembly with the camera body. Product functions were confirmed.

Some of the Phillips screw heads show distress, so it must have been replaced.

Timeframe: Shipped equipment on 5/24 and 6/9, returned 6/16.

This diagnosis doesn't explain the issues I saw with my RF lenses, but these issues were 10 times less common.

I have yet to perform tests with the returned equipment.

PicPocket Veteran Member • Posts: 5,897
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
1

electronicsenthusiast wrote:

If you can showcase that, specific lens issue theory can't explain it.

Sorry, I should have been clearer. I meant showcase to Canon. Because things get serious only when they can reproduce and acknowledge. Ideally a repeatable test they can run and confirm. That way they will not go down the specific lens fix

When the IBIS wobble issue was discovered, juanmaasecas did exactly that. The effort is documented in this thread - https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64972492

Took some time, but once Canon acknowledged and some other sites picked that up, a fix came in the next firmware update

-- hide signature --
 PicPocket's gear list:PicPocket's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +16 more
Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr. Senior Member • Posts: 1,169
Re: Significant Motion Blur, Canon R6. Caused by IBIS? Wide angle only.
2

Thanks for letting us know. I think that issues with canon lenses and cameras are underreported on fora like this. I love Canon, but they are not perfect (nothing is).

Tell us about the tests when you finish. Thanks again,

Armando

-- hide signature --

'Heavens declare the glory of God,' and I hope my pictures will too.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arodri3/

 Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list:Armando J. Rodriguez, Jr.'s gear list
Canon EOS-1D X Canon 6D Mark II Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM +4 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads