DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Is the Panasonic 35-100/2.8 ii actually a 34-85 lens?

Started Jan 12, 2022 | Discussions
umggc Junior Member • Posts: 32
Is the Panasonic 35-100/2.8 ii actually a 34-85 lens?

Hello.

Today I bought a second hand panasonic 35-100/2.8 m2 lens from someone on the web. The lens exterior looks fine, with only some small scratches on the metal casing. Test images also look sharp across the frame. Strangely, I noticed that the field of view is wilder than expected.

I did some simple testing, using two cameras, olympus em1.1 and em10.1, and several lenses I have, including olympus 75-300, 12-40/2.8, 14-42-R, and an old 50-200swd. From the viewfinder, and out-of-camera jpegs, the panasonic is wilder than my other lenses at the same focal lengths.

Essentially, the field of view with the panasonic at 100mm, which is zoomed to the end, is better matched by both olympus lenses at around 85mm, and definately wider than the two olympus at 100mm.

The wide end is also wider. At 35mm, again the end of the range, the field of view is more like 34 or 33mm on olympus 12-40 and 14-42.

Can someone with experience on this panasonic lens comment on the focal length issue? Is this normal for this lens? and will panasonic cameras crop the images automatically to produce 35-100 field of view?

Thanks in advance.

-- hide signature --

Just loving photography!

 umggc's gear list:umggc's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-PL7 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54mm 1:2.8-3.5 +3 more
steppenwolfer Senior Member • Posts: 1,153
Did you focus at infinity?
1

I remember reading that some lenses can be "shorter" at closer distances due to psychical design of lenses.

 steppenwolfer's gear list:steppenwolfer's gear list
Sony RX100 V Nikon Z7 Nikon Z fc Nikon AP-F 70-300mm F4.5-5.6E Nikon Z 24-70mm F4 +8 more
Samuel Dilworth
Samuel Dilworth Senior Member • Posts: 1,391
Re: Did you focus at infinity?

steppenwolfer wrote:

I remember reading that some lenses can be "shorter" at closer distances due to psychical design of lenses.

Yes. You have to test at infinity. Even then, there are noticeable deviations from the nominal focal length, almost always toward normal focal lengths. That is, teles are shorter than claimed and wides are longer than claimed.

OP umggc Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: Did you focus at infinity?

Thanks. I was testing against a map on my wall, about 2 meters away, surely a close distance. Is it "focus breathing" or something like that?

-- hide signature --

Just loving photography!

 umggc's gear list:umggc's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-PL7 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54mm 1:2.8-3.5 +3 more
Samuel Dilworth
Samuel Dilworth Senior Member • Posts: 1,391
Re: Did you focus at infinity?

umggc wrote:

Is it "focus breathing"

Yes. The focal length changes with focusing distance.

OP umggc Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: Did you focus at infinity?

Hm, pretty dramatic breathing for this lens.

-- hide signature --

Just loving photography!

 umggc's gear list:umggc's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus E-PL7 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54mm 1:2.8-3.5 +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads