PDAF is better, and you must pay for it
3
eques wrote:
The last years I have been using the Panasonic GX7 and GX8 and the EM5ii with the 2.8/12-40, 2.8/40-150, 4-5.6/40-150, 4/12-100 and 1.7/20
While I agree with humansvillian in his praises of the EM5ii, he omits AF - and this is the reason I won't try another Olympus body without PDAF, which might be different.
The Panasonic bodies work perfectly with the above mentioned Olympus lenses and AF is faster and more precise than with the EM5ii. This applies to portraits, but even more so to plants (trees, grass, flowers).
A GX7 is around 200 € like the EPL7 here, I got the GX8 for 300 3 years ago, the EM5ii is around 350.
however bear in mind, the Achilles heel of the Panasonic bodies are the thumb wheels, so I would only buy if you can return it. BQ of the EM5ii is better.
Peter
First, understand that MFT cameras are an addiction. You have a sensor inside a box that duplicates or exceeds the performance the best 35 film ever made, and you accumulate all these tiny lenses for your camera.
I don’t understand all the technical reasons why, but the 2004 Rebel XT I gave to my daughter beats the hell out of any Olympus camera I own for continuous autofocus and my Canon T5i just destroy them.

My solution for better autofocus is a used $150 Canon 55-250mm STM lens for my Canon T5i.
PDAF is better. For almost ten years now, the Olympus pricing plan is
For $600 you get a rangefinder styled body with no EVF, no PDAF. Pay nearly double that and you get a P-5, Pen F, or now a P7.
Add another $100 and you get the latest M-10. It has a viewfinder. No PDAF.
For a thousand bucks you get a super deluxe M10, the M5. It’s a fancier toy. The last one has PDAF, but unfortunately lost its magnesium body.
The king Olympus is the $1,500 M1. You get PDAF and all the bells and whistles.
And if you want even more there’s a monster M1X with dial battery grips and dial processors and it knows if you are focusing on a car, plane, or person.
I’ve been buying new computers for nearly 40 years. After five years or so, I replace them and the old one is only good to donate to the local school. They aren’t really all that much better since about 1995, but they grow obsolete.
This is an iPhone 10. I saw an iPhone 12 the other day. My thousand dolllar iPhone is bound for trade in and not too long in the future.
The OP has a $250 M10.2, and I’ve got a $350 M5.2.
Neither have PDAF. If you want that cheap, buy a used M1, only $300.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/31124-Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-Digital-Camera-Black-Body-w-HLD-7-grip-17mm-lens-bag-/194673171208?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&_trksid=p2349624.m46890.l6249&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0
A used M1.2 is about $600.
Why would you risk saving a hundred or two buying a used M5.3 or used M1.3? You’d lose the warranty and the new camera unboxing smell and no little packages of silica gel that say DO NOT EAT.
What Olympus is doing, and rather successfully, is encouraging customers who can afford it to pay a thousand or fifteen hundred for new toys if they really want PDAF.
But if you just want a little box to mount your lenses, the M10.2 is really just as good as any. And I doubt it will depreciate much until it just rolls over dead.
-- hide signature --
Humansville is a town in the Missouri Ozarks