DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

A new comparisonm

Started Jul 11, 2021 | Discussions
uuglypher
uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
A new comparisonm
-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
comparison of image pairs

…and for those wanting larger images

Looking forward to your responses.

Dave

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Turbguy1
MOD Turbguy1 Senior Member • Posts: 1,467
Re: comparison of image pairs

I do not note any dramatic difference.

-- hide signature --
 Turbguy1's gear list:Turbguy1's gear list
Minolta DiMAGE 7 Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Nikon D300 +3 more
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: comparison of image pairs

OK…howzabout a distinguishable, albeit not “dramatic” difference?
 Or do you truly appreciate no difference in total perceptible depth from most distant detail to most proximate detail between pair A and  pair B?

Dave

-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Artak Hambarian
Artak Hambarian Junior Member • Posts: 40
Re: comparison of image pairs

B seems to be deeper.

-- hide signature --

Dr. Artak Hambarian,
College of Engineering
American University of Armenia (AUA)

 Artak Hambarian's gear list:Artak Hambarian's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Nikon Coolpix P500 Nikon Coolpix P330 Nikon D7000 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR +19 more
Brian F Flint
Brian F Flint Regular Member • Posts: 184
Re: comparison of image pairs

B has slightly more depth. I view using the cross-view method.

 Brian F Flint's gear list:Brian F Flint's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 Sony RX10 III Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.5 1-5x Macro
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: comparison of image pairs

Artak Hambarian wrote:

B seems to be deeper.

Thank you, Artak; I appreciate your input.

Dave Graham

-- hide signature --

uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

foot Veteran Member • Posts: 4,806
answer: B

I had to use a slightly different technique to get the 3D effect:

1- start by making a "pointy hand" with index finger pointing up

2- place finger on tip of nose

3- slowly move index finger forward, toward the image

4- I kept moving my finger waway until the frames around each image started to move toward each other

"B" def had a more pronounced 3D effect. The illusion was that the tail end of the images seemed on the same "plane" as the front part, but further away

"A" the tail part of the images just seemed to be above the front part, without much 3D effect

 foot's gear list:foot's gear list
Sigma dp2 Quattro
3D Gunner Senior Member • Posts: 1,031
Re: comparison of image pairs

First of all, the pairs are not aligned vertically, which makes them difficult to look at.
Although the groups of triangles are positioned differently in depth relative to the stereoscopic window, group A is carried out at a greater depth than group B.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads