DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Which lens would you recommend?

Started Mar 11, 2021 | Questions
MichaelCab New Member • Posts: 1
Which lens would you recommend?

Hi. I have Canon EF-S 18-55 mm f/4-5.6 IS STM and Tamron AF 70-300 mm f/4,0-5,6 Di LD Macro pro Canon and I want to sell the lenses and for the money I would like to buy any better lens. I have Canon EOS 200D. I’m thinking of Canon EF-S 18-200 mm f/3,5-5,6 IS, Canon EF-S 18-135 mm f/3,5-5,6 IS USM or Sigma 18-200 mm f/3,5-6,3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary and maybe Sigma 18-300 mm f/3,5-6,3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary for Canon. Which one should I choose for the best image quality, the best chromatical aretation (don’t know how it’s written) and with fast auto focusing? Or would you recomment any other for the same price? Would like to use the lens for landscape, street photo and sport sometimes.

ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
Canon EOS Rebel SL2 (EOS 200D / Kiss X9)
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Digirame Forum Pro • Posts: 41,857
Re: Which lens would you recommend?
1

If the image quality is good I think I would keep the Tamron 70-300mm lens (to give you good range). I replaced my Canon 18-55mm STM lens with a Canon 18-135mm USM lens. I haven't analyzed it with tests, but only can say that I'm happy with it. I've started using it a lot for street photos with Liveview.

Here's one example. This was taken recently under cloudy skies.

benjilafouine Veteran Member • Posts: 3,875
Re: Which lens would you recommend?

I’ll start. I have a Sigma lenses combo:

1. The wide angle Sigma 10-20 mm f4-5.6. I had an issue with that lens and send it for service. Seems like they fixed it and I should get it back today. Customer service told me that this lens is supposed to be very sharp (mine was fuzzy).

2. The normal angle Sigma 17-50 mm f2.8.

3. The Sigma telephoto 18-200 mm f3.5-6.3

I even have a Sigma 50 mm macro f2.8

Overall, these lens are doing the job. I had sharpness issues with the wide angle and they changed the rear element for me free of charge despite that the lens is not under warranty anymore.

The 17-50 mm lens is a great lens.

As for the 18-200 IS, it is a good all around lens but a bit slow focusing (it is chasing sometimes) but overall the image quality is good. With the 18-200 however, you’ll have a hard time taking birds in flight but for slower animals like ducks swimming, it is just fine. I’m joining a photo taken with the 18-200.

As for the macro side of things, my lenses do not mention macro but they are of older models. The telephoto one although can focus up to 16 inches.

For macro photography, I rely more on my 50mm macro lens.

That being said, nothing beats a good Canon L lens. My 70-200 L f2.8 beats my Sigma lens in terms of speed and quality of image. However, they are very expensive.

Personally, I would avoid an EF-S lens at this point if you are hoping to go mirrorless in the future. I’d stick with EF. Hope this helps.

Ducks with the Sigma 18-200 lens.

-- hide signature --

Regards,
There is always something to shoot/snap, you just have to know how to do it and have the right gear.
Benji

 benjilafouine's gear list:benjilafouine's gear list
Canon PowerShot S5 IS Canon PowerShot SX110 IS Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Canon PowerShot G16 Canon EOS 40D +12 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads