DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Minolta SRT 102/KODAK ULTRAMAXX ISO 400

Started Oct 12, 2020 | Discussions
johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Minolta SRT 102/KODAK ULTRAMAXX ISO 400
1

More of my own film devopment

EmmaNems Regular Member • Posts: 451
no color correction?

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Hike Pics
Hike Pics Senior Member • Posts: 2,917
Re: Minolta SRT 102/KODAK ULTRAMAXX ISO 400
1

I like the darker colors and tones, creates a very moody image.

What lens are you using?

-- hide signature --

...Wes...

OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: no color correction?

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

It is film straight up

OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: Minolta SRT 102/KODAK ULTRAMAXX ISO 400

Hike Pics wrote:

I like the darker colors and tones, creates a very moody image.

What lens are you using? THX  Rokkor 50 mm 1.7

toni
toni Senior Member • Posts: 1,694
Re: no color correction?

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

-- hide signature --
 toni's gear list:toni's gear list
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony Alpha NEX-5N Sony SLT-A77 +7 more
EmmaNems Regular Member • Posts: 451
color correction can be subjective

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

But being subjective is sometimes simply an excuse to not learn it and tackle it. Sometimes horribly wrong color is used to good effect. That's rare. Bad color is usually just bad color, as it is here.

OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: color correction can be subjective
2

EmmaNems wrote:

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

But being subjective is sometimes simply an excuse to not learn it and tackle it. Sometimes horribly wrong color is used to good effect. That's rare. Bad color is usually just bad color, as it is here.

Who are you, a proffessional?? save your opinion I am not interested in it nor do I NEED YOUR CRITIQUE, G o follow some one else around,as I notice you bother other people too.

OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: no color correction?

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

at least you get it ,yes I could have clean it up some but as far as color I wouldn't change a thing

neilt3
neilt3 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,008
Don't feed the troll !
1

johnapp wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

But being subjective is sometimes simply an excuse to not learn it and tackle it. Sometimes horribly wrong color is used to good effect. That's rare. Bad color is usually just bad color, as it is here.

Who are you, a proffessional?? save your opinion I am not interested in it nor do I NEED YOUR CRITIQUE, G o follow some one else around,as I notice you bother other people too.

The guy's just a troll , usually polluting the film forum .

I'm supposed he's not claimed it's overexposed as well , as he seems to not understand exposure either .

That said it's dubious if he's ever used a camera anyway , he seems to just like trying to wind people up .

I have him on my ignore list , it's only when someone quotes his drivel I see what's written .

.

Regards the colour , it's looks like you've just entered the "blue hour " after the sunset .

The foreground would be much darker already , as non of the reds or yellows from the sun would be reaching here , therefore the colour looks correct and true to life .

Which you would know best , because you were there !

If you had warmed the scene as he suggests , I would have thought it would look quite false , and the evening atmosphere would be lost .

( In which case he'd be wining that it should be much bluer ! )

.

Regards dust and scratches , anything that I can see on the image when displayed filling the screen , I remove , film or digital .

If your pixel peeping enough when viewing a shared image to find dust at that level you've already stopped looking at the picture and trying to look cleaver picking fault .

That said he might have been looking at the two canoeists and the grains of sand thinking they were dust !

Thanks for sharing , be please keep doing so .

 neilt3's gear list:neilt3's gear list
Minolta DiMAGE 7 Minolta DiMAGE 7Hi Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 Konica Minolta DiMAGE A200 +68 more
toni
toni Senior Member • Posts: 1,694
Re: no color correction?

johnapp wrote:

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

at least you get it ,yes I could have clean it up some but as far as color I wouldn't change a thing

Regarding the marks I usually remove them in Photoshop, as they aren't part of the image.If you prefer not to, it's ok too.

The way I scan my photos I need to adjust color always to remove the base color, I avoid going overboard with that. I see nothing wrong in this regard with your photo. Its very pleasing to me.

Keep posting your photos as they are excellent for those that started their photography with digital to learn the strengths of film.

-- hide signature --
 toni's gear list:toni's gear list
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony Alpha NEX-5N Sony SLT-A77 +7 more
OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: Don't feed the troll !

neilt3 wrote:

johnapp wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

But being subjective is sometimes simply an excuse to not learn it and tackle it. Sometimes horribly wrong color is used to good effect. That's rare. Bad color is usually just bad color, as it is here.

Who are you, a proffessional?? save your opinion I am not interested in it nor do I NEED YOUR CRITIQUE, G o follow some one else around,as I notice you bother other people too.

The guy's just a troll , usually polluting the film forum .

I'm supposed he's not claimed it's overexposed as well , as he seems to not understand exposure either .

That said it's dubious if he's ever used a camera anyway , he seems to just like trying to wind people up .

I have him on my ignore list , it's only when someone quotes his drivel I see what's written .

.

Regards the colour , it's looks like you've just entered the "blue hour " after the sunset .

The foreground would be much darker already , as non of the reds or yellows from the sun would be reaching here , therefore the colour looks correct and true to life .

Which you would know best , because you were there !

If you had warmed the scene as he suggests , I would have thought it would look quite false , and the evening atmosphere would be lost .

( In which case he'd be wining that it should be much bluer ! )

.Thank you so much for your kind words

Regards dust and scratches , anything that I can see on the image when displayed filling the screen , I remove , film or digital .

If your pixel peeping enough when viewing a shared image to find dust at that level you've already stopped looking at the picture and trying to look cleaver picking fault .

That said he might have been looking at the two canoeists and the grains of sand thinking they were dust !

Thanks for sharing , be please keep doing so .

OP johnapp Regular Member • Posts: 423
Re: no color correction?

toni wrote:

johnapp wrote:

toni wrote:

EmmaNems wrote:

johnapp wrote:

More of my own film devopment

This one is so shifted toward cyan and blue. Even the sand is blue. A small bit of correction toward red and yellow in the middle values really helps it.

Color correction its a subjective matter, it depends on the message or mood the photographer want to capture. I kind of like the image as it is.

I'm curious as to why you would not retouch all the dust before presenting work.

Not all are dust spots some are scratches on the film surface. It puzzles me why people don't retouch those from their digital scans. And has nothing to do with the medium being used.

at least you get it ,yes I could have clean it up some but as far as color I wouldn't change a thing

Regarding the marks I usually remove them in Photoshop, as they aren't part of the image.If you prefer not to, it's ok too.

The way I scan my photos I need to adjust color always to remove the base color, I avoid going overboard with that. I see nothing wrong in this regard with your photo. Its very pleasing to me.

Keep posting your photos as they are excellent for those that started their photography with digital to learn the strengths of film.

I will do and  again thx for the kind words

The Davinator
The Davinator Forum Pro • Posts: 24,707
Re: Don't feed the troll !

You nailed it.  Thanks

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads