X-T200 Raw request

TryCatchFinally wrote:

Hi aramgrg,

May I also request for an X-T100 RAW file at ISO6400 30seconds dark frame please?

I would like to be able to compare it with the image that simonsuniverse has sent.

Thank you!

Hello there, sorry for late reply, heavy weak here. I do not have the X-t100 with me now, it's in parents' place, but my x-t200 arrived. I will post the files from it soon.

aramgrg wrote:

TryCatchFinally wrote:

Hi aramgrg,

May I also request for an X-T100 RAW file at ISO6400 30seconds dark frame please?

I would like to be able to compare it with the image that simonsuniverse has sent.

Thank you!

Hello there, sorry for late reply, heavy weak here. I do not have the X-t100 with me now, it's in parents' place, but my x-t200 arrived. I will post the files from it soon.

Wooo nice, congratulations! It would be great to see long exposures more than 30s (darks and stars). I can't wait!  This will help me decide which camera for astro I'd get (X-T100 vs X-T200).

I can tell you in advance that whichever you get, the results will be so close that only software stats can distinguish The reason I went with t200 is that  t100 was unusable for travel and everyday use.

How would you compare the T200 with a T3 in terms of DR and AF speeds? Agree with you that the T100 was too slow even though the sensor was decent.

debo wrote:

How would you compare the T200 with a T3 in terms of DR and AF speeds? Agree with you that the T100 was too slow even though the sensor was decent.

for that i will need time. the camera still sits in box

Haha, it reminds me of Christmas. Waiting eagerly for the box to be opened and wondering what's inside?

The things I'm hoping to learn about the X-T200 for astrophotography are:

1.  If there's a "star eating / spatial filtering" problem like in the X-T2/X-T3 on exposures longer than 30 seconds?

2. If it has some sort of a "glow" issue like in the X-T2 on 2-5mins exposures or more?

3. A comparison of noise between X-T100 vs X-T200.

Here is an 8min file from the x-t200.

and here is one from x-t100

+5 EV, NR0, sharpness default.

The T200 look cleaner to my amateur eyes

aramgrg wrote:

Here is an 8min file from the x-t200.

and here is one from x-t100

+5 EV, NR0, sharpness default.

Hi aramgr,

The indicated exposure time is 30 Seconds but looks like the file themselves are exposed at 480 seconds, thanks!

I was wondering if you can share 1 more Dark from the X-T200 at ISO 3200 at 2 mins if possible?

Thanks again!

It looks like, all we need to know now is if the star-eater/spatial filtering issue affects the X-T200 after 30 seconds.

I think the X-T200 and X-T100 darks are better than my X-T2 dark at ISO800 @8mins (in terms of that amp glow on the left).

Aramgrg, will you be able to share the RAW versions of the 2 files you posted earlier?  I think that will also help, thanks!

Hi Guys,

I was wondering if anyone had a chance to do more astro long exposures with the X-T200?

Thank you