DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Reliabilty of m43 mirrorless cameras

Started Jul 8, 2020 | Discussions
Mark Thornton Veteran Member • Posts: 4,570
Re: Reliabilty of m43 mirrorless cameras -- GX1

The conditions for SS are complicated. Even the orientation (portrait vs landscape) makes a difference. I still have the GX1 and 14-42PZ, but the GX1 is now just a backup body for my GX9. The 14-42 works well on the GX9 when I want something smaller than the 12-60 f3.5/5.6.

Mark

 Mark Thornton's gear list:Mark Thornton's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 Olympus Zuiko Digital 11-22mm 1:2.8-3.5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 +8 more
toporossa Regular Member • Posts: 173
Mixed experiences: Reliable E-PL1, unreliable E-M5

I had never problems with the E-PL1 which i used four years as my only camera (except smartphone cam) and some more years as second camera - ok, after six or seven years of use the faux leather peeled of the hand grip in the tropical heat of India but with some glue that was easy to "repair" when I was back in Europe. While my E-M5 (first generation) bought as my next camera had two repairs after three to four years (so outside warranty)- first it didn't wake up from sleeping mode unless I tuned it off and on again and sometimes I had to change battery- initially I ignored that, but than sent it in for repair when the screen begun to turn darker and darker unless it was unusable (it wasn't broken so I don't know what caused the problem) - than it turned out that the shutter was damaged too (unrelated to the other two problems). One year later or so I had to send it in again, because the camera often lost contact with the battery and after some time only worked when i added some paper or rubberband do thicken the battery (of cause I tried to clean the contacts and different batteries, but that didn't help), this time the repair was cheaper than the first time. So for me the "cheap model" turned out to be more reliable than the highly praised E-M5.

jf_tea Senior Member • Posts: 1,577
Re: Reliabilty of m43 mirrorless cameras -- GX1

Isola Verde wrote:

jf_tea wrote:

Isola Verde wrote:

jf_tea wrote:

Isola Verde wrote:

Emsquared wrote:

I just got a G85 and the PZ14-42 is pretty nice on it with EFC shutter, It was good with GX-7 E-shutter too.

I see from the separate thread that you're well aware of its shortcomings when mounted on the cameras of its day.

I happily got rid of mine, along with both GX1 and G3, but am glad to hear you've found a way to make use of yours!

Peter

GX1:

I've never observed shutter shock fuzziness when I use the GX1+20/1.7 or with 14/2.5 -- (I am not denying other users might have noticed SS with some lenses).

Even with the 100-300 at 300mm, the GX1 was ok. But, I might just have been lucky. ... I sold my 100-300 anyway. Because I found the FZ150, and, then FZ200 more convenient (because smaller to carry when in a canoe or when hiking) -- yes, I am lazy.

Not sure you were lucky, you simply chose a wiser option than the ill-matched - and rather pricey - pairing I had the misfortune to pick as my introduction to M43...

"The Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GX1 will be available in black and silver bodies in mid-December and in the following kit options: DMC-GX1-X with the LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 14-42mm / F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S (H-PS14042) lens will have a suggested retail price (SRP) of $949.99; the DMC-GX1-K with the 14-42 standard zoom for an SRP of $799.99; and the DMC-GX1, body only for an SRP of $699.99. "

Proper pre-release testing would have identified the issue - and let them drop that particular package... the GX1 was OK once I went out and bought other lenses, and the 14/42PZ worked well enough on soft-shuttered cameras... but as a kit they made a treacherous combination.

Peter

hmmm... a friend has a GX1 + 14-42 PZ. I shall warn him to change the lens if he finds he takes (too many) SS fuzzy pictures.

Thanks for the explanation !

Does this happen at specific focal lengths and/or shutter speed ?

I would guess it happened more at 42mm and at less than 1/200s... but it might occur with less obvious parameters too.

Not sure I can help with specific good/bad settings - after so long, I've dumped most of the blighted pictures.

But here are a couple - taken within the same minute, at very similar settings, but from slightly different positions - of which one's rather less appealing than the other?

Screen grabs of the same images, at 100% and at 50% magnification...

Peter

The left one of the comparison at 100% magnification is quite bad.

I will explain that shutter shock problem to my friend. He should be aware of it and check the output of his GX1+14-42 PZ kit before he travels or go hike on a long trail with it. Perhaps he will be more happy with the Panasonic 14/2.5 or 20/1.7 or 14-45 or the 14-42 Mark II (non-PZ) or the 12-32.

Thanks for the samples.

-- hide signature --

-JF

 jf_tea's gear list:jf_tea's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Pentax K-01 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Pentax smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited +6 more
jf_tea Senior Member • Posts: 1,577
E-PL2 "wheel"

Within 2 years, the "wheel" of our E-PL2 did not operate reliably. It was rather inefficient (and frustrating) to struggle with it to try to make adjustments.

Luckily, a little bit of contact cleaner was a good way to fix it. But it needed to be used again after a few months (depending on how often we used the camera). Note: the camera was not used in harsh, dusty environment. And, no other camera suffered a similar problem within the same places/times of use.

Otherwise, the E-PL2 was a great camera. Fast to operate, nice screen (for its time), very nice output (files).

-- hide signature --

-JF

 jf_tea's gear list:jf_tea's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Pentax K-01 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Pentax smc DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited +6 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads