Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR

Started 2 months ago | Discussions
JimKasson
JimKasson Forum Pro • Posts: 27,425
Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
23

Quite an alphabet soup in the title, huh? This afternoon, I ran a photon transfer curve (PTC) for the Z50, which allows me to calculate the input-referred read noise (RN) in electrons, the full well capacity (FWC), and the photographic dynamic range. Not that it matters, but I used a CV 125 mm f/2.5 Macro-Apo-Lanthar with the FTZ adapter for this job. The legendary sharpness of the lens didn't matter much, since I defocused heavily.

First up, a set of normalized photon transfer curves:

The mean signal level, in stops from full scale, is the x-axis. The y-axis is the signal to noise ratio, normalized to an 8-inch print viewed from 18 inches away using the same methodology that Bill Claff uses for his PDR measurements. The top curve is from ISO 100, the next for ISO 200, and so on. The measured data points are the crosses, and the modeled approximation is the solid lines. There is excellent agreement. Don't worry about the solid black horizontal line for now; we;ll get to that at the end of the post.

There are two interesting things about the curve set. The first is the high shadow SNR at ISO 400. The Z50 changes to higher conversion gain at that ISO, which makes the read noise drop, and that makes the shadows less noisy. The second is the closeness of the bottom curve to the one immediately above it. That occurs because Nikon performs some noise reduction using digital signal processing at that ISO setting.

The modeler program that I wrote tell me what the full well capacity it found for each ISO setting and each raw plane. Here's what that looks like:

In a perfect world, all the FWCs would be the same. Here they come very close to that, for each channel considered separately. However, the red and blue channels are lower than the others. That's due to the Nikon white balance prescaling, which confuses the software that I wrote. I have a way to calibrate out the effect, but I didn't use it on this data set, because it requires that I figure out the gain settings for my particular serial number. Just think of the red and blue FWCs as too low, and the FWC of the camera as about 48,000 electrons.

Knowing the FWC, I can calculate the input referred read noise:

The jump downwards at ISO 400 is because of the increased conversion gain at that ISO. RN at high ISOs is approaching 1 electron, which is about the state of the consumer camera art these days.

To show you the photographic dynamic range, I'll change the axes of the top curve in this post:

This shows the shadow signal to noise ratio as a function of ISO setting and mean signal level. The Claff PDF threshold is plotted as the black horizontal line. You can see that the PDR at base ISO is a bit over 11 stops.

This is a fine example of a typical CMOS sensor in today's cameras. It looks like there were no compromises in IQ when this sensor was designed, even though it is used in an inexpensive camera.

I know that this is all pretty technical for some of you, and I'd be happy to answer any questions you have. If you don't understand the curves, the big takeaway is that this camera has a sensor that is pretty much the current state of the art.

Jim

-- hide signature --
 JimKasson's gear list:JimKasson's gear list
Nikon D5 Sony a7 III Nikon Z7 Fujifilm GFX 100 Sony a7R IV +2 more
James Stirling
James Stirling Senior Member • Posts: 5,878
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
3

Thanks for the  effort you put into this Jim as ever your work puts most/all the review sites to shame

-- hide signature --

Jim Stirling:
It is not reason which is the guide of life, but custom. David Hume

 James Stirling's gear list:James Stirling's gear list
Sony RX100 IV Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Nikon Z7 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS +10 more
Escaping Senior Member • Posts: 1,199
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
3

Hi Jim, thank you for putting this analysis together.  I must admit that I read and re-read it a few times and I could barely decipher the meanings out of the data.  Thank you for putting a summary of what all this means.

JimKasson wrote:

This is a fine example of a typical CMOS sensor in today's cameras. It looks like there were no compromises in IQ when this sensor was designed, even though it is used in an inexpensive camera.

I know that this is all pretty technical for some of you, and I'd be happy to answer any questions you have. If you don't understand the curves, the big takeaway is that this camera has a sensor that is pretty much the current state of the art.

Jim

Much appreciated !!! Regards,

-- hide signature --

Esc (CT, USA) www.pbase.com/cvanlang
Z6 / Df / D810 / D750 / D500 / D7500 / D5500 / K-5 / X-T2 / X-E3 / GX85 / V1-V2-V3 / LX100 / X30 / Coolpix A / ZS100 / HX80

 Escaping's gear list:Escaping's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Fujifilm X20 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 Fujifilm X30 Panasonic LX100 +81 more
Mebiuspower Regular Member • Posts: 437
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
1

JimKasson wrote:

This is a fine example of a typical CMOS sensor in today's cameras. It looks like there were no compromises in IQ when this sensor was designed, even though it is used in an inexpensive camera.

I cannot understand any of the charts, but owning a D500 I know exactly the performance of this sensor.

Meanwhile others will still cry about IBIS and how they cannot take a proper photo without it.

-- hide signature --
 Mebiuspower's gear list:Mebiuspower's gear list
Nikon D500 Nikon D5600 Nikon D850 Nikon Z50 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm F2.8G ED +6 more
NCB Senior Member • Posts: 1,156
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
3

Thanks a lot, Jim. Seems Nikon approach to the whole Z range is to not purposely cripple any camera, but to use the latest technology. Building for the future. Maybe a bumpy ride now but should pay dividends in future. If Nikon survives, which I'm pretty sure they will.

 NCB's gear list:NCB's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Nikon D3100 Nikon Df Nikon Z6 Nikon Z50
madecov
madecov Veteran Member • Posts: 5,939
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR

English for the mathematically challenged please. 

-- hide signature --

Police Officer (Retired)
No plan survives first contact with the enemy.

 madecov's gear list:madecov's gear list
Nikon 1 V3 Nikon Z7 Nikon Z50 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm F2.8G ED +17 more
JimKasson
OP JimKasson Forum Pro • Posts: 27,425
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
1

madecov wrote:

English for the mathematically challenged please.

http://www.photonstophotos.net/GeneralTopics/Sensors_&_Raw/Sensor_Analysis_Primer/Sensor_Analysis_Primer.htm

http://www.photonstophotos.net/Emil%20Martinec/noise.html

After you've digested that material, ask questions.

If you really want to dig into the subject:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0819467227/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0

Jim

-- hide signature --
 JimKasson's gear list:JimKasson's gear list
Nikon D5 Sony a7 III Nikon Z7 Fujifilm GFX 100 Sony a7R IV +2 more
Jos12
Jos12 Regular Member • Posts: 269
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR
1

Thank you! 
Did you do the same test before on the D7500/D500 and is the outcome more or less  the same? 
what I’m seeing now from the few pics of the Z50 I really like them.

-- hide signature --

D90, D7000, D750, Nikon 200-500 5.6, Nikon 80-400mm 4,5-5.6, Tokina 50-135mm 2.8, Sigma 17-70mm 2.8-4.0, Nikon 35mm 2.0, nikon 55 mm macro 2.0

JimKasson
OP JimKasson Forum Pro • Posts: 27,425
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR

Jos12 wrote:

Thank you!
Did you do the same test before on the D7500/D500 and is the outcome more or less the same?
what I’m seeing now from the few pics of the Z50 I really like them.

I’ve never tested either of those DSLRs. Sorry.

-- hide signature --
 JimKasson's gear list:JimKasson's gear list
Nikon D5 Sony a7 III Nikon Z7 Fujifilm GFX 100 Sony a7R IV +2 more
Jos12
Jos12 Regular Member • Posts: 269
Re: Nikon Z50 RN, FWC, and PDR

Thanks for your reply.  Maybe The Z50 can be the start... 

-- hide signature --

D90, D7000, D750, Nikon 200-500 5.6, Nikon 80-400mm 4,5-5.6, Tokina 50-135mm 2.8, Sigma 17-70mm 2.8-4.0, Nikon 35mm 2.0, nikon 55 mm macro 2.0

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads