DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

Started Nov 11, 2019 | Questions
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

Helen wrote:

eilivk wrote:

Helen wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

A word of caution - there's one potential fly in the ointment with this combination. The Panasonic 14-42 PZ lens is easily disturbed by vibrations during exposure (also known as shutter shock) and unfortunately the E-PL6 doesn't have the two alternative workarounds for this - silent shutter or 0-Second Anti-Shock (which is effectively a way of achieving electronic first curtain shutter operation). The latter came in on the E-PL7 and the silent shutter feature didn't appear in the E-PL models until the E-PL9 (in a somewhat limited mode of its own, though the identical-looking E-PL10 recently announced for the Japanese market has it available in PASM modes too).

You could find your particular combination OK, but if not, the likely result is that from time to time at shutter speeds between 1/100 and 1/160 or maybe sometimes even up to about 1/200 with the lens at 42mm, you might notice unexpected softness or - more annoyingly - slightly out-of-alignment double images on contrasty edges.

It really depends on the combination of the particular body's shutter vibration frequency and the individual lens's vulnerability to it (with a bit of interaction from your own personal shake when holding the camera too!) as to how noticeable it is. The camera's shortest Anti-Shock setting of 1/8 sec may help somewhat, but it does make it feel laggy when shooting. Sorry for mentioning this but at least you can check for it quickly and know whether it's an issue for you this way.

A shame about the fly (potential), but I ordered it anyway. Would it work better with the 20mm? Nice combination for city streets. I'll just see how it works. Anyway the camera is almost for free. And I think the seller has a small Oly zoom too. When I get used to the camera I can get more lenses.

Well, the 20mm f1.7 isn't prone to being disturbed by shutter shock so that's fine. I recall reading that some have said this lens has a motor which for some reason can cause a bit of electrical interference with Sony sensors such as the Olympus uses, which may sometimes show up as faint horizontal banding (never used the 20mm f1.7 on an Olympus E-PL5 or 6, so I'm not sure how common it is). Whereas Panasonic bodies don't allow continuous AF with this lens due to its fairly slow and quite loud AF motor, Olympuses do allow it to C-AF (though it's quite slow and still quite loud, as expected).

Well, I'll just have to see. Always a lot to learn. I really like the 20mm. Now I see another Panasonic 20mm with E-PM2 for $50! Crazy...

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
Guy Parsons
Guy Parsons Forum Pro • Posts: 40,000
Some comments and links.

burritosandbeer wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

That exact setup is my walk around in a jacket pocket setup.

Usually with the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 and 45-150mm f/4-5.6 in the other pocket. You do not get the in camera corrections Panasonic would apply, such as for CA, but I don't see much barrel distortion or vignetting. I'm not much of a purest, but I like the combo myself.

The geometric corrections have always been applied with Olympus and Panasonic lenses used as a mix. That data is in the lens anyway so that is easy.

The CA and diffraction corrections came in a later TruePic version, but easily fixed anyway in post process if a problem occurs.

For the OP:

As mentioned above the E-PL6 is an E-PL5 Mk2 in truth, so 99.9% of E-PL5 info applies to the E-PL6 as well.

As an E-PL5 owner I did make the pages that were linked above and you may find them useful.

If mixing Olympus bodies and Panasonic lenses there is a wealth of wrong information peddled on this forum re stabilisation and the real truth is seen on my page about stabilisation rules .

My Timeline may also help sort out where features entered the Pen and OM-D lines.

Yes, the E-PL5/6 IBIS acts in such a way as to maybe introduce a whisker of blur in what would normally be a perfectly good shot, so the best advice is to use Panasonic lens OIS on that body, or keep IBIS off and only to use IBIS when the shutter speeds get too slow for your own hand-holding ability. The result being that a whisker blurry shot (at pixel peeping levels) is way better than a user shaken shot that is bad even at full screen display. I used to get 3 stops of stabilisation with the E-PL5 IBIS or with Panasonic Mega OIS.

Shutter shock is real on the E-PL5/6 and as mentioned will be mostly with a few suspect lenses. Most likely is worst when using 1/60 to 1/125 shutter speeds, if it is going to happen at all. I can only recall very few cases of it with two E-PL5 used over a few years. Not an issue to worry about.

When on a tripod the shock (if it happens) will be exactly the same amplitude for shot after shot, but when hand-held the shock seems to vary from near nothing up to about 4 times the tripod amount. Been there, done that in many experiments.

In the later days of my E-PL5 I graduated to the chunky 12-40/2.8 lens and that made a big difference to the results I was getting compared to my previous 14-45mm Panasonic lens. Just better AF, snappier operation overall and better to use.

Then I moved on another step and bought E-P5 when its price in Australia dropped below the E-PL5 price. That was truly the best thing I ever did, way better stabilisation and no more shutter shock.

To help with menus even my E-P5 menu pages will help with understanding most of the same stuff that happens in the E-PL5/6. There is a basic E-PL5 Custom Menu page which may help some, but delving into the E-P5 page is probably more complete with some explanations.

To set up the SCP and Custom Menu (if not set) look here .

To assign MySets to the Mode Dial see here . That feature is exactly why I bought the E-PL5.

If looking for Olympus user manuals go to this page .

Hope some of that is of help, otherwise just post a question in this forum to get answers from many people.

Regards..... Guy

OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: Some comments and links.

Guy Parsons wrote:

burritosandbeer wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

That exact setup is my walk around in a jacket pocket setup.

Usually with the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 and 45-150mm f/4-5.6 in the other pocket. You do not get the in camera corrections Panasonic would apply, such as for CA, but I don't see much barrel distortion or vignetting. I'm not much of a purest, but I like the combo myself.

The geometric corrections have always been applied with Olympus and Panasonic lenses used as a mix. That data is in the lens anyway so that is easy.

The CA and diffraction corrections came in a later TruePic version, but easily fixed anyway in post process if a problem occurs.

For the OP:

As mentioned above the E-PL6 is an E-PL5 Mk2 in truth, so 99.9% of E-PL5 info applies to the E-PL6 as well.

As an E-PL5 owner I did make the pages that were linked above and you may find them useful.

If mixing Olympus bodies and Panasonic lenses there is a wealth of wrong information peddled on this forum re stabilisation and the real truth is seen on my page about stabilisation rules .

My Timeline may also help sort out where features entered the Pen and OM-D lines.

Yes, the E-PL5/6 IBIS acts in such a way as to maybe introduce a whisker of blur in what would normally be a perfectly good shot, so the best advice is to use Panasonic lens OIS on that body, or keep IBIS off and only to use IBIS when the shutter speeds get too slow for your own hand-holding ability. The result being that a whisker blurry shot (at pixel peeping levels) is way better than a user shaken shot that is bad even at full screen display. I used to get 3 stops of stabilisation with the E-PL5 IBIS or with Panasonic Mega OIS.

Shutter shock is real on the E-PL5/6 and as mentioned will be mostly with a few suspect lenses. Most likely is worst when using 1/60 to 1/125 shutter speeds, if it is going to happen at all. I can only recall very few cases of it with two E-PL5 used over a few years. Not an issue to worry about.

When on a tripod the shock (if it happens) will be exactly the same amplitude for shot after shot, but when hand-held the shock seems to vary from near nothing up to about 4 times the tripod amount. Been there, done that in many experiments.

In the later days of my E-PL5 I graduated to the chunky 12-40/2.8 lens and that made a big difference to the results I was getting compared to my previous 14-45mm Panasonic lens. Just better AF, snappier operation overall and better to use.

Then I moved on another step and bought E-P5 when its price in Australia dropped below the E-PL5 price. That was truly the best thing I ever did, way better stabilisation and no more shutter shock.

To help with menus even my E-P5 menu pages will help with understanding most of the same stuff that happens in the E-PL5/6. There is a basic E-PL5 Custom Menu page which may help some, but delving into the E-P5 page is probably more complete with some explanations.

To set up the SCP and Custom Menu (if not set) look here .

To assign MySets to the Mode Dial see here . That feature is exactly why I bought the E-PL5.

If looking for Olympus user manuals go to this page .

Hope some of that is of help, otherwise just post a question in this forum to get answers from many people.

Regards..... Guy

Thanks for very useful information! Remember when I bought G3 and had no knowledge of such cameras, this was the best forum. Think I have most of the information I need, it's just to remember what to do when.

Good I did not order the red G3, looked again and imagined in real life, would have been too much. Black is ok. Can't imagine to be without it. Think it's the size and EVF and full titing LCD. Like my first camera, Canon S2.

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
JakeJY Veteran Member • Posts: 5,442
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

Allan Brown wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

I have the EPL5 which is almost the same. They have the same processor - Truepic VI.

This does not provide complete correction for Panasonic lenses. That did not occur till VII. It is not a major problem however and can be fixed if you shoot raw.

I forget exactly what corrections are not covered but you can look it up.

The IBIS of the EPL5/6 is not very good and actually cause problems with images. Best to set the camera to use the Lens OIS instead. Menu C; Lens IS Priority ON.

The problem with the Olympus menu system is: It is easy to use but it is the undocumented interactions and poor language that causes the problems.

Other than that, it is a nice little camera and I still use mine with the Panasonic 12-32.

Allan

The correction not provided is the CA correction. The E-M1 with the Truepic VII was the first Olympus to provide it. The E-PL6 just came barely before it still using the Truepic VI processor.

"Chromatic aberration is very low, as the E-M1 is the first Olympus Micro Four-Thirds model that suppresses lateral chromatic aberration in JPEGs."

https://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m1/olympus-e-m1A4.HTM

Note that it's not completely fair to say it's an issue for Panasonic lenses specifically. Rather it's that the older Olympus bodies don't provide CA correction for any lenses, even Olympus ones.

 JakeJY's gear list:JakeJY's gear list
Nikon Coolpix S9300 Nikon D5000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR +6 more
alcelc
alcelc Forum Pro • Posts: 19,003
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

I expect Olympus body should handle those distortion, CA etc correction in-camera as any Panny body will do.

As this 14~42PZ is the few Panny lenses do not support DUAL IS, except DFD you have nothing to lose on using it on Oly body.

But unless you need the power and silence zoom from it, it has nothing to compare with modern f/3.5ish standard zoom lenses like 12~32 (portability), 14~45 or 14~42 mk-II (IQ and speed operation of manual zoom). On IQ it is not outstanding from its peer...

Before 12~32, this lens was great for a compact setup. I bought it for GF3 and GX1 (beware shutter shock on M-shutter). Now 12~32 has taken over its place. Wishing you know what you are expecting on this lens.

-- hide signature --

Albert

 alcelc's gear list:alcelc's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Panasonic G85 +11 more
jeffharris
jeffharris Forum Pro • Posts: 11,409
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

The PZ 14-42mm is not a very good lens.

It’s only time the lens is compact is when the camera is OFF. Or it’s in your bag.

Its very susceptible to shutter shock. 
It’s not particularly sharp, if that’s of concern to you.

I owned one briefly (for about a week) and shot with it extensively. I really disliked the power zoom, too. The negatives outweighed it’s “in the bag” compactness.
Luckily, B&H gave me a full refund.

For less money (forgetting the camera) you can get the far better 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II

 jeffharris's gear list:jeffharris's gear list
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm F0.95 Aspherical Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 +26 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

alcelc wrote:

I expect Olympus body should handle those distortion, CA etc correction in-camera as any Panny body will do.

As this 14~42PZ is the few Panny lenses do not support DUAL IS, except DFD you have nothing to lose on using it on Oly body.

But unless you need the power and silence zoom from it, it has nothing to compare with modern f/3.5ish standard zoom lenses like 12~32 (portability), 14~45 or 14~42 mk-II (IQ and speed operation of manual zoom). On IQ it is not outstanding from its peer...

Before 12~32, this lens was great for a compact setup. I bought it for GF3 and GX1 (beware shutter shock on M-shutter). Now 12~32 has taken over its place. Wishing you know what you are expecting on this lens.

OK, maybe I'm confused by these lenses. Important to know which version it is. I only got the impression the small 14-42 was better than the 12-32. Well, it must be better than the G3 kit lens which I never use.

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

jeffharris wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

The PZ 14-42mm is not a very good lens.

It’s only time the lens is compact is when the camera is OFF. Or it’s in your bag.

Its very susceptible to shutter shock.
It’s not particularly sharp, if that’s of concern to you.

I owned one briefly (for about a week) and shot with it extensively. I really disliked the power zoom, too. The negatives outweighed it’s “in the bag” compactness.
Luckily, B&H gave me a full refund.

For less money (forgetting the camera) you can get the far better 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II

OK. A bit late to cancel now. Will check it agains the G3 kit lens, which is worst... At least it's smaller when it's off. So the 12-32 is rather good? And are there more than one version?!

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Olympus 14-42?

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
Isola Verde
Isola Verde Forum Pro • Posts: 10,640
Re: Olympus 14-42?

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

I'm a little sad to say so but yes, it is!

I got my own 14-42 (let's call it that one the PZ - PowerZoom - version, shall we?) in a kit, with the Lumix GX1.

At least in my hands, they formed a terrible combination, with lots of pictures being spoiled by shutter shake.

Many other photographers, perhaps gripping the camera differently - or using it more often with the LF2 viewfinder than I did - have reported their own experiences of this problem.... and no doubt there'll be some who deny its existence entirely.

Thought I wouldn't be able to find any examples, but here we are.... two taken with the same equipment, at almost exactly the same settings [zoomed to 34mm in one, reframed to 35mm in the other], of almost exactly the same subject [although shot from different positions on the steps of our City Hall], with only a few seconds between... seen here as 100% views, of roughly the centre of the frame - one's totally horrid, the other's just not very nice?

May be necessary to click on this and enlarge it to see the whole story?

It was occurring so frequently that I put the GX1 aside for a couple of years, and instead took the Samsung NX route for a while - until one day spotting a well-priced second-hand example of the ordinary 14/42 kit lens at a local shop, with which the GX1 was transformed.... in a good way!

Good news though is that I've not seen the same double-images etc with the 14/42PZ on any of my other cameras - however I very rarely use the GX1, nor either of those two Panasonic kit lenses nowadays.... and instead absolutely love their little 12/32 - and grudgingly, because of its less-wide start, quite enjoy the simplicity of the Olympus 14/42 EZ power zoom, with its special auto-opening lens cap.

That said, the 14/42PZ pictures from other cameras that I've just been looking through are generally quite a lot nicer than I'd expected - so it may yet see some more activity!

Peter

 Isola Verde's gear list:Isola Verde's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus PEN E-P7
alcelc
alcelc Forum Pro • Posts: 19,003
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

eilivk wrote:

alcelc wrote:

I expect Olympus body should handle those distortion, CA etc correction in-camera as any Panny body will do.

As this 14~42PZ is the few Panny lenses do not support DUAL IS, except DFD you have nothing to lose on using it on Oly body.

But unless you need the power and silence zoom from it, it has nothing to compare with modern f/3.5ish standard zoom lenses like 12~32 (portability), 14~45 or 14~42 mk-II (IQ and speed operation of manual zoom). On IQ it is not outstanding from its peer...

Before 12~32, this lens was great for a compact setup. I bought it for GF3 and GX1 (beware shutter shock on M-shutter). Now 12~32 has taken over its place. Wishing you know what you are expecting on this lens.

OK, maybe I'm confused by these lenses. Important to know which version it is. I only got the impression the small 14-42 was better than the 12-32. Well, it must be better than the G3 kit lens which I never use.

If you were referring to the kit lens of G3, likely you should have the 14~42 mk-I. I also have it, a kit lens of GF3. Since it had a offering of <US$30 by used gear shops when it was still new some years ago, it is gathering dust since then.

On IQ, it is not very far behind from its peers. However my copy of 14~42 mk-I is very poor on operation (stiff zoom and focus ring, very plastic feeling etc).

As per members opinion, among the standard kit zoom class of Panny, it seems that IQ of 14~42 mk-II might be equal, if not better, than 14~45 at the top. Followed by 12~32, 12~60 and IMHO 14~42PZ as well. 14~42 mk-I might be the worst at the back of its class.

12~32 is a highly recommended lens by members. Small, cheap, DUAL IS & DFD on compatible Panny bodies, fast AF and reasonable sharp for its class (IQ of my copy is marginally behind 14~45, similar to 14~42PZ and marginally better than 14~42 mk-I). If its twist to extend mechanism can be made tougher, and it has a focus ring, it could easily be one of the best of its class.

-- hide signature --

Albert

 alcelc's gear list:alcelc's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Panasonic G85 +11 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

alcelc wrote:

eilivk wrote:

alcelc wrote:

I expect Olympus body should handle those distortion, CA etc correction in-camera as any Panny body will do.

As this 14~42PZ is the few Panny lenses do not support DUAL IS, except DFD you have nothing to lose on using it on Oly body.

But unless you need the power and silence zoom from it, it has nothing to compare with modern f/3.5ish standard zoom lenses like 12~32 (portability), 14~45 or 14~42 mk-II (IQ and speed operation of manual zoom). On IQ it is not outstanding from its peer...

Before 12~32, this lens was great for a compact setup. I bought it for GF3 and GX1 (beware shutter shock on M-shutter). Now 12~32 has taken over its place. Wishing you know what you are expecting on this lens.

OK, maybe I'm confused by these lenses. Important to know which version it is. I only got the impression the small 14-42 was better than the 12-32. Well, it must be better than the G3 kit lens which I never use.

If you were referring to the kit lens of G3, likely you should have the 14~42 mk-I. I also have it, a kit lens of GF3. Since it had a offering of <US$30 by used gear shops when it was still new some years ago, it is gathering dust since then.

On IQ, it is not very far behind from its peers. However my copy of 14~42 mk-I is very poor on operation (stiff zoom and focus ring, very plastic feeling etc).

As per members opinion, among the standard kit zoom class of Panny, it seems that IQ of 14~42 mk-II might be equal, if not better, than 14~45 at the top. Followed by 12~32, 12~60 and IMHO 14~42PZ as well. 14~42 mk-I might be the worst at the back of its class.

12~32 is a highly recommended lens by members. Small, cheap, DUAL IS & DFD on compatible Panny bodies, fast AF and reasonable sharp for its class (IQ of my copy is marginally behind 14~45, similar to 14~42PZ and marginally better than 14~42 mk-I). If its twist to extend mechanism can be made tougher, and it has a focus ring, it could easily be one of the best of its class.

Well, I should have posted the image at the start. Maybe the seller will give me the Oly lens instead and maybe it will be ok on G3. The first kit lens was soft on one side. The replacement was in order, bou no good anyway...

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: Olympus 14-42?

Isola Verde wrote:

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

I'm a little sad to say so but yes, it is!

I got my own 14-42 (let's call it that one the PZ - PowerZoom - version, shall we?) in a kit, with the Lumix GX1.

At least in my hands, they formed a terrible combination, with lots of pictures being spoiled by shutter shake.

Many other photographers, perhaps gripping the camera differently - or using it more often with the LF2 viewfinder than I did - have reported their own experiences of this problem.... and no doubt there'll be some who deny its existence entirely.

Thought I wouldn't be able to find any examples, but here we are.... two taken with the same equipment, at almost exactly the same settings [zoomed to 34mm in one, reframed to 35mm in the other], of almost exactly the same subject [although shot from different positions on the steps of our City Hall], with only a few seconds between... seen here as 100% views, of roughly the centre of the frame - one's totally horrid, the other's just not very nice?

May be necessary to click on this and enlarge it to see the whole story?

It was occurring so frequently that I put the GX1 aside for a couple of years, and instead took the Samsung NX route for a while - until one day spotting a well-priced second-hand example of the ordinary 14/42 kit lens at a local shop, with which the GX1 was transformed.... in a good way!

Good news though is that I've not seen the same double-images etc with the 14/42PZ on any of my other cameras - however I very rarely use the GX1, nor either of those two Panasonic kit lenses nowadays.... and instead absolutely love their little 12/32 - and grudgingly, because of its less-wide start, quite enjoy the simplicity of the Olympus 14/42 EZ power zoom, with its special auto-opening lens cap.

That said, the 14/42PZ pictures from other cameras that I've just been looking through are generally quite a lot nicer than I'd expected - so it may yet see some more activity!

Peter

Yes, I see the difference! Maybe go for the Oly lens instead.

Funny you mention GX1, found one very cheap, and got LVF-2 for free - contrast and color off the scale, but useful in strong sun. And same battery as G3. As far as I can see on level with G3, maybe not in low light (but then I use NX500 which is in another league).

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
Isola Verde
Isola Verde Forum Pro • Posts: 10,640
Re: Olympus 14-42?

eilivk wrote:

Yes, I see the difference! Maybe go for the Oly lens instead.

Funny you mention GX1, found one very cheap, and got LVF-2 for free - contrast and color off the scale, but useful in strong sun. And same battery as G3. As far as I can see on level with G3, maybe not in low light (but then I use NX500 which is in another league).

Wonder which one that's likely to be?

Details and reviews of some here...
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/olympus/reviews/

I only know the recent EZ version - the others are all a fair bit larger, although perhaps not as big as the early Panasonic 14/42 kit zooms, the ones before that PZ model.

As mentioned, the PZ seems fine on other cameras - and I've just shot a dozen or so with it on the E-PL5 (with its anti-shock set to an almost-unnoticeable delay of 1/8th second) without any sign of the vibration appearing.

That same sites' Panasonic lens reviews...
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/panasonic/reviews/

... with a generally-enthusiastic one for the PZ here...

https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/panasonic/14-42mm-f3.5-5.6-asph-power-ois-lumix-g-x-vario-pz/review/

I'd now looking forward to pairing that with the Oly 9-18, to cover nearly all of my "city" shooting needs!

**********

My G3 never did get much use.... seemed a good idea, after getting the GX1 working properly, but a bit larger than I find convenient.

None of them though quite match the results from the NX3000 - Samsung's withdrawl from camera-making was a big loss!

Peter

 Isola Verde's gear list:Isola Verde's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus PEN E-P7
alcelc
alcelc Forum Pro • Posts: 19,003
Re: Olympus 14-42?

I do not recommend 14-42 PZ just because it is an old design (so should cost less), non Dual IS compatible and it is still very expensive if new. On money wise IMHO it is just not worth it unless you need the video benefit of this lens.

14-42 PZ had not good reviews in the old days mostly because it was launched in similar time with GX1. This lens had been tested on GX1 or older models at that time when shutter shock was not generally realised yet. The soft result had played a part on the reviews.

If the shutter shock could be avoided, it could be quite a good lens instead. The following were MTF scores from Opticallimits (Panny 14-42PZ and Oly 14-42 EZ ) both were tested on GX1:

The best from these 2 lenses at various focal length:

Panny 14-42PZ @ 14mm 2868/2183 (center/edge), Oly 14-42 EZ @ 14mm 2573/1748

Panny @28mm 2618/2341, Oly @25mm 2497/2410

Panny @42mm 2400/2229, Oly @42mm 2328/2247

Note: It is not sure whether any potential shutter shock be avoided from the 14-42 PZ on the above test because GX1 has no e-shutter and shutter shock could not be avoided by using a tripod.

The Oly 14-42 EZ is a highly regarded lenses by its owners until now. Comparing to the test result, you can imagine how the 14-42PZ would be (or better if shutter shock was there in such test result).

So if you can get it cheap and your camera can deal with shutter shock, I shall not rule it out.

A snapshot took by 14-42 PZ just a few minutes ago under EFCS of G85. I suppose it can be good upto 200% view :

-- hide signature --

Albert

 alcelc's gear list:alcelc's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Panasonic G85 +11 more
jeffharris
jeffharris Forum Pro • Posts: 11,409
Re: E-PL6 with Lumix 14-42 powerzoom?

eilivk wrote:

jeffharris wrote:

eilivk wrote:

I'm after the lens, but would not mind this red camera as bonus. For $160. Two questions, will I lose some corrections I get with a Panasonic camera? And does it take hours to understand Olympus menus? Am used to Panasonic, which always has been easy.

The PZ 14-42mm is not a very good lens.

It’s only time the lens is compact is when the camera is OFF. Or it’s in your bag.

Its very susceptible to shutter shock.
It’s not particularly sharp, if that’s of concern to you.

I owned one briefly (for about a week) and shot with it extensively. I really disliked the power zoom, too. The negatives outweighed it’s “in the bag” compactness.
Luckily, B&H gave me a full refund.

For less money (forgetting the camera) you can get the far better 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II

OK. A bit late to cancel now. Will check it agains the G3 kit lens, which is worst... At least it's smaller when it's off. So the 12-32 is rather good? And are there more than one version?!

The PZ 14-42mm is also incredibly overpriced. It was nearly double the cost of the standard 14-42mm II.

The 12-32mm is a much better lens. The newer 14-42mm is much better. Both are excellent lenses, especially given that they’re kit lenses.

 jeffharris's gear list:jeffharris's gear list
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm F0.95 Aspherical Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 +26 more
jeffharris
jeffharris Forum Pro • Posts: 11,409
Re: Olympus 14-42?

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

Skip the Olympus 14-42mm kit lenses. While okay, they’re not as good as either the Panasonic 12-32mm or 14-42mm II.

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

Yep, that’s the one.

 jeffharris's gear list:jeffharris's gear list
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm F0.95 Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm F0.95 Aspherical Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 +26 more
OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: Olympus 14-42?

jeffharris wrote:

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

Skip the Olympus 14-42mm kit lenses. While okay, they’re not as good as either the Panasonic 12-32mm or 14-42mm II.

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

Yep, that’s the one.

Hm, too late to cancel, but can maybe change. So which is worst?!

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
Helen
Helen Veteran Member • Posts: 7,606
Re: Olympus 14-42?

eilivk wrote:

jeffharris wrote:

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

Skip the Olympus 14-42mm kit lenses. While okay, they’re not as good as either the Panasonic 12-32mm or 14-42mm II.

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

Yep, that’s the one.

Hm, too late to cancel, but can maybe change. So which is worst?!

What follows is long, overly-detailed and based on my personal experience and opinions as far as optical quality goes, but hopefully of some use!

I agree with what alcelc said, actually (I used to have a Panasonic 14-42 PZ, which is what your picture shows) - it is pretty good optically - it's just that it is so vulnerable to vibration during exposure from the mechanical shutters of many cameras that its quality is then knocked down considerably by the softening inflicted by this in a wide range of typically-used shutter speeds.  The fairly short-lived X series of which it is a member was intended to have higher-than-normal optical quality, in fact, so that was a great irony for this lens.  Of course, with absolutely any of the other kit lenses discussed (Olympus and Panasonic 14-42 models, and the Panasonic 12-32), there is some scope for sample variation as they are made in large numbers for a low price - since they are heavily discounted, typically, when included in a kit with a body.

There are lots of different 14-42mm lenses in both the Panasonic and Olympus ranges. I believe you may have mentioned you have the first Panasonic 14-42mm lens which was kitted with the G3 - the large one that looks like the previous 14-45mm Panasonic kit lens but is not as well thought-of.  Aside from a few colour variation restyles, that one didn't change (I was never a big fan of it as it is large and has a really patchy, stiff zoom action on every example I've had).  The much smaller 14-42 II (which I think carries an A suffix on its code-like Panasonic model number, rather than a II) is a lot nicer, and is surprisingly small.  It doesn't need extending for use (in fact, it's the same size as the Olympus 14-42 II or 14-42 IIR which I'll describe in a minute, when the latter is retracted and unusable) and it only extends a little on zooming, which is unusual.  This lens first appeared as a standard kit lens for the GF6 and the GX7; it has been available in a very bright milled metal silver finish, an iridescent milled black metal, and the current black version is satin matte black metal (not milled) with greyish silver HD and focal length markings (vs red and goldish yellow on the earlier version).  These are metal skins over the plastic chassis.  Note: if this lens has a plastic mount, it's from a camera kit.  If it's metal, it was sold on its own.  In my experience of several, is optically very good, but can vary, as they all can.

The Panasonic 12-32, which is either matte silver or matte satin black, is very petite and requires manual extension past a strong detent to use.  A similarly strong twist is required to retract it.  At least on earlier ones, this sometimes resulted in its metal zoom ring coming unglued from the plastic body of the lens barrel.  It has a good optical reputation; the ones I have are OK but not outstanding.  The ones supplied initially in GM1 and GM5 kits had metal mounts; later, from the GX80/85 and presumably the GF7 onwards, they are plastic. I assume maybe separately boxed ones could have had metal mounts, like the 14-42 II/A. Something to note with the 12-32 - it has no physical ring for manual focus at all; Panasonics marketed from its time onwards typically use the touchscreen to produce a slider for manually focusing it; earlier Panasonics and all Olympuses just cannot do MF with it as far as I know.

The first Olympus 14-42mm kit zoom was supplied with the E-P1 and E-P2; it can be recognised by its 40.5mm filter thread and slightly broad barrel. It came in matte black (with matte silver mount ring) or matte warm silver and had a metal mount. It is pretty good optically but has a reputation for its two-part extending barrel being disturbed by shutter shock.  It's retractible - you twist it through a light click stop to extend, and pull a little lock switch backwards to retract it (easily). Unlike the above Panasonics, it doesn't have internal focus, so it extends and rotates the barrel as it focuses, and it does this quite noisily and slowly in modern terms.  The zoom action is also quite "crunchy".  There was also a slight variation of this lens which was supplied as the kit lens for the E-PL1 - this one has a plastic mount instead.  The black version doesn't have the contrasting silver rear ring - it's all-black. The silver one looks identical to the metal mount - they both have a little S added to the full spec designation that appears on top of the lens, between the focus and zoom rings.  These both should be rare these days, and best avoided IMHO.

Both these lenses were replaced by the totally redesigned 14-42 II lens, which has a 37mm filter thread.  Its finish is the same as the original version of the previous lens (i.e. black version has a matte silver ring at the rear, same now-dated scalloped zoom ring) but it always has a plastic mount. It's much slimmer than the original version albeit ever so slightly longer when retracted. It has the same extension and retraction mechanism (light click to extend, flip a little switch back to retract - this is to prevent accidental retraction - many use it when extending the lens but it is totally unnecessary to do so as with the previous version). Unlike the previous design, this lens has a very quiet, fast AF motor and internal focusing.  It's usually quite a decent optical performer too.

This lens then became the 14-42 IIR, which is still current and is exactly the same in all but cosmetics.  The focus ring is finely textured in the current style, with a finer ribbed focus ring and the black version is all-black; the silver version is a cooler, more metallic silver than the older lenses.  Both have a removable trim ring that fits over the hood-mounting bayonet; it simply makes them look nicer with it in place.  Neither the II nor the IIR is anything like as vulnerable to shutter shock as the original two versions.

Finally we have the still-current 14-42EZ, the pancake zoom.  Like the Panasonic 14-42 PZ, this is an auto-extending/retracting power zoom lens.  Like the Panasonic, it has a metal mount, but it is smaller.  It too is not particularly bothered by shutter shock.  Like the Panasonic, the motors are fast and quiet, and focus is internal.  Whereas the Panasonic zooms with a switch, the Olympus disguises it as a zoom ring, though it operates a short-travel 2-direction sprung switch under the ring.  Unlike the Panasonic, which uses a 2-way rocker switch to manually focus, the Olympus uses a ring just like the non power-zooms.  Early production of the 14-42EZ (some years ago now) seemed to have some optical issues causing softness which were quickly corrected in later production (probably a manufacturing alignment issue I suspect) and I have only met one bad one personally out of about 8 (I found a supplier of really cheap ones split from kits and they came in handy for various bodies!!).

All the Panasonic lenses described have optical image stabilisation of one generation or another; all the described Olympuses don't.  All of the lenses described except the original Olympus (metal mount and plastic mount S version) have quiet, fast internal focus.

OP eilivk Senior Member • Posts: 2,580
Re: Olympus 14-42?

Helen wrote:

eilivk wrote:

jeffharris wrote:

eilivk wrote:

Earlier the seller said he has an Olympus 14-42 for sale, are there more than one and is it good? Also on Panasonic cameras?

Skip the Olympus 14-42mm kit lenses. While okay, they’re not as good as either the Panasonic 12-32mm or 14-42mm II.

To be sure, here is the lens and camera, this is the one to be avoided?

Yep, that’s the one.

Hm, too late to cancel, but can maybe change. So which is worst?!

What follows is long, overly-detailed and based on my personal experience and opinions as far as optical quality goes, but hopefully of some use!

I agree with what alcelc said, actually (I used to have a Panasonic 14-42 PZ, which is what your picture shows) - it is pretty good optically - it's just that it is so vulnerable to vibration during exposure from the mechanical shutters of many cameras that its quality is then knocked down considerably by the softening inflicted by this in a wide range of typically-used shutter speeds. The fairly short-lived X series of which it is a member was intended to have higher-than-normal optical quality, in fact, so that was a great irony for this lens. Of course, with absolutely any of the other kit lenses discussed (Olympus and Panasonic 14-42 models, and the Panasonic 12-32), there is some scope for sample variation as they are made in large numbers for a low price - since they are heavily discounted, typically, when included in a kit with a body.

There are lots of different 14-42mm lenses in both the Panasonic and Olympus ranges. I believe you may have mentioned you have the first Panasonic 14-42mm lens which was kitted with the G3 - the large one that looks like the previous 14-45mm Panasonic kit lens but is not as well thought-of. Aside from a few colour variation restyles, that one didn't change (I was never a big fan of it as it is large and has a really patchy, stiff zoom action on every example I've had). The much smaller 14-42 II (which I think carries an A suffix on its code-like Panasonic model number, rather than a II) is a lot nicer, and is surprisingly small. It doesn't need extending for use (in fact, it's the same size as the Olympus 14-42 II or 14-42 IIR which I'll describe in a minute, when the latter is retracted and unusable) and it only extends a little on zooming, which is unusual. This lens first appeared as a standard kit lens for the GF6 and the GX7; it has been available in a very bright milled metal silver finish, an iridescent milled black metal, and the current black version is satin matte black metal (not milled) with greyish silver HD and focal length markings (vs red and goldish yellow on the earlier version). These are metal skins over the plastic chassis. Note: if this lens has a plastic mount, it's from a camera kit. If it's metal, it was sold on its own. In my experience of several, is optically very good, but can vary, as they all can.

The Panasonic 12-32, which is either matte silver or matte satin black, is very petite and requires manual extension past a strong detent to use. A similarly strong twist is required to retract it. At least on earlier ones, this sometimes resulted in its metal zoom ring coming unglued from the plastic body of the lens barrel. It has a good optical reputation; the ones I have are OK but not outstanding. The ones supplied initially in GM1 and GM5 kits had metal mounts; later, from the GX80/85 and presumably the GF7 onwards, they are plastic. I assume maybe separately boxed ones could have had metal mounts, like the 14-42 II/A. Something to note with the 12-32 - it has no physical ring for manual focus at all; Panasonics marketed from its time onwards typically use the touchscreen to produce a slider for manually focusing it; earlier Panasonics and all Olympuses just cannot do MF with it as far as I know.

The first Olympus 14-42mm kit zoom was supplied with the E-P1 and E-P2; it can be recognised by its 40.5mm filter thread and slightly broad barrel. It came in matte black (with matte silver mount ring) or matte warm silver and had a metal mount. It is pretty good optically but has a reputation for its two-part extending barrel being disturbed by shutter shock. It's retractible - you twist it through a light click stop to extend, and pull a little lock switch backwards to retract it (easily). Unlike the above Panasonics, it doesn't have internal focus, so it extends and rotates the barrel as it focuses, and it does this quite noisily and slowly in modern terms. The zoom action is also quite "crunchy". There was also a slight variation of this lens which was supplied as the kit lens for the E-PL1 - this one has a plastic mount instead. The black version doesn't have the contrasting silver rear ring - it's all-black. The silver one looks identical to the metal mount - they both have a little S added to the full spec designation that appears on top of the lens, between the focus and zoom rings. These both should be rare these days, and best avoided IMHO.

Both these lenses were replaced by the totally redesigned 14-42 II lens, which has a 37mm filter thread. Its finish is the same as the original version of the previous lens (i.e. black version has a matte silver ring at the rear, same now-dated scalloped zoom ring) but it always has a plastic mount. It's much slimmer than the original version albeit ever so slightly longer when retracted. It has the same extension and retraction mechanism (light click to extend, flip a little switch back to retract - this is to prevent accidental retraction - many use it when extending the lens but it is totally unnecessary to do so as with the previous version). Unlike the previous design, this lens has a very quiet, fast AF motor and internal focusing. It's usually quite a decent optical performer too.

This lens then became the 14-42 IIR, which is still current and is exactly the same in all but cosmetics. The focus ring is finely textured in the current style, with a finer ribbed focus ring and the black version is all-black; the silver version is a cooler, more metallic silver than the older lenses. Both have a removable trim ring that fits over the hood-mounting bayonet; it simply makes them look nicer with it in place. Neither the II nor the IIR is anything like as vulnerable to shutter shock as the original two versions.

Finally we have the still-current 14-42EZ, the pancake zoom. Like the Panasonic 14-42 PZ, this is an auto-extending/retracting power zoom lens. Like the Panasonic, it has a metal mount, but it is smaller. It too is not particularly bothered by shutter shock. Like the Panasonic, the motors are fast and quiet, and focus is internal. Whereas the Panasonic zooms with a switch, the Olympus disguises it as a zoom ring, though it operates a short-travel 2-direction sprung switch under the ring. Unlike the Panasonic, which uses a 2-way rocker switch to manually focus, the Olympus uses a ring just like the non power-zooms. Early production of the 14-42EZ (some years ago now) seemed to have some optical issues causing softness which were quickly corrected in later production (probably a manufacturing alignment issue I suspect) and I have only met one bad one personally out of about 8 (I found a supplier of really cheap ones split from kits and they came in handy for various bodies!!).

All the Panasonic lenses described have optical image stabilisation of one generation or another; all the described Olympuses don't. All of the lenses described except the original Olympus (metal mount and plastic mount S version) have quiet, fast internal focus.

Thanks! I'll print this out. Now I know what I should have known before. Anyway I take the lens in the image, will not make any noise to get the Oly lens (and maybe be "downgraded" from 10 to 7,5) as I got two Panasonic cameras and maybe will sell Olympus camera.

 eilivk's gear list:eilivk's gear list
Canon PowerShot G10 Ricoh GR Digital Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh CX4 Sony RX1 +10 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads