DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

How many megapixels do you want in an M?

Started May 11, 2019 | Polls
R2D2 Forum Pro • Posts: 26,528
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?
2

thunder storm wrote:

R2D2 wrote:

HaroldC3 wrote:

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

jaap51 wrote:

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

I don't care about more megapixels as much as I care about less noise at higher ISO... For me the sensor of my M5 produces too much noise at ISO 1600 and up.

This a big reason for me to be looking around at other systems then the Canon M system, no matter how much I like the rest of the camera (size, weight, handling, many control dials).

I have bought a Pentax K1-mk2 for landscape photography. It is another world concerning IQ and DR compared to my beloved M6-mk1.

I started reading a review and it looks interesting, but it's a DSLR not mirrorless, and apart from the camera itself being very expensive I'd also have to invest in lenses starting from scratch again!

At least with another mirrorless system I can still use my EF lenses.

Sounds like you'll be migrating to an R mount camera then. Personally, I'm waiting for the R5/6 announcement and hoping Canon has a sale on the original R. 30mp on FF sensor is more than enough for me.

+3 These two systems (M and R) are for shooters with entirely different priorities. Make the right choice even if it hurts.

R2

Sometimes i think Canon - when starting from scratch - could have gone with just one system serving all priorities.

True.  But I don't think Canon was anywhere close to being ready to implement the RF mount (and associated lenses) when they launched the M System.  And even if the RF hardware had been ready eight years ago, the corporate will certainly wasn't! 

R2

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries

 R2D2's gear list:R2D2's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R7 +1 more
Tim van der Leeuw Senior Member • Posts: 1,363
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?

R2D2 wrote:

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

R2D2 wrote:

+3 These two systems (M and R) are for shooters with entirely different priorities. Make the right choice even if it hurts.

R2

I'm almost a complete beginner when it comes to photography. I bought the M5 about a year ago not knowing what my style of shooting would be, or anything.

I bought it because it is light, small, has small light lenses, and good, flexible controls. And fit within the budget I had at the time.

Definitely fits the profile of most of us here!

I didn't yet know what limits the camera, sensor, or lens-system would have and how that would impact me. Yeah, I know from reading reviews that the sensor wouldn't be as good as a comparably priced Nikon DSLR, but I liked the compactness of mirrorless and couldn't yet see how exactly it would affect me.

"Know Thyself." It takes a while.

Well, regards to what shooter I am, it turns out I like macros (flowers and insects), landscapes (to some degree), and nighttime shooting (with or without the stars being very prominent).

Great stuff to be shooting!

For both insects and nighttime shooting I'd like to be able to drop the ISO quite high so I can have a faster shutter-time for a given aperture.

For those starting out with macros I highly recommend using (well-diffused) flash. Flash will help combat both camera shake and subject motion blur (at even small apertures and low ISOs).

I sometimes aid with an extra lamp but I don't have any flashlight equipment, diffusor, etc. That type of equipment is all still new to me.

From the EF-M 28mm Macro on the M5...

And here some of my own macro shots from the M5...

I had a small light helping me on this one as it was evening, low light indoors. Shot with the 28mm EF-M macro.

Shot in the bright sunlight. Cropped. Shot with the 28mm EF-M macro.

This one is shot with the 24-70mm f/4.0L on the M5

You likely already have the tools necessary to shoot outstanding macros. Hard work and practice are next.

Ah yes, I know... Lots of patience and hunting for good shots.

For nighttime shots (and low light in general), a long long time ago there used to be a camera support called a tripod.

Tripod... Gotcha.

I think this will do for a tripod, for the time being.

But don't worry, I'm not going to foist one on you. I hate using them myself!!!

What can help is a bigger and cleaner sensor of course, but that won't solve the problem entirely. It'll gain you a stop, maybe two.

So what to do? Get better with what you have (if upgrading to FF isn't in the books).

Yup, that's what I'm working hard on!

Have you tried Canon's "Handheld Night Scene Mode" or "Multi-shot Noise Reduction?"

Nope, haven't tried those. I shoot RAW+JPEG mostly, generally in Av mode. But I don't mind the tripod, not at all, so that probably works out OK

Do you shoot bursts and cherry-pick the best? (I gain about a stop in handhold-ability).

Yep, when subjects are moving a lot (either by themselves on in the wind) I quite often do that.

Tried the "string tripod?" (Google it). Have you used something like the "Twist Grip" handholding technique? (uses isometrics to gain stability).

Haven't tried those things yet. Will look that up sometimes.

How good is your noise reduction technique/program?

DxO PhotoLabs is what I use most often, at the moment. Its noise-reduction seems quite alright, to me.

I'm longingly looking at a lot of gear and evaluating what it could do for my shooting but in the end, I'll probably stay with the M5 for a while and save up money for a good system in a year or two, or spend it on other accessories such as an extra lens here or a filter there.

Window shopping is a ton of fun. Setting up a roadmap is great incentive. And targeting a specific need (like a new lens) will pay big dividends.

Yup, is what I'm working on now. That roadmap, what to get next to incrementally improve my technique.

Technique and technical understanding are not the end-all and be-all of good photography, but they're the basis so I'm working on those basics now.

In the end I hope to have 2 bodies and lenses I can use on both, so that I can use 2 lenses without much hassle and use each body for it's own strengths.

If you really need better autofocus for instance, then the M6ii would be the next logical step in the M System.

Or perhaps an M5 mark ii. Should probably also have focus-stacking.

But I think that I will be better of saving up for a bigger FF DSLR or mirrorless, like a Nikon Z6.

Or perhaps go for the Fuji APS-C cameras, they still appear to be a step up from the M5.

But keep in mind that barring the need for improved low light/action AF, the M5 is a very capable camera. I shot with one for two years (and enjoyed the heck out of it). For myself, a BIF rig is really the only thing I need beyond the M6ii that I have now. And my output requirements are quite high (12x18" or larger prints for gallery display/sale).

I hope this helps quell the G.A.S. for a while!

Holler back with any specific questions!

R2

Thanks for your advice!

Some more recent shots I made.

Long exposure night-time shot. (Yes, it was totally dark at night and there was no moon. This is what you get for a 17 minutes exposure... )

Luminmous clouds

 Tim van der Leeuw's gear list:Tim van der Leeuw's gear list
Canon EOS M5 Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H2S Sigma 2x EX DG Tele Converter +17 more
R2D2 Forum Pro • Posts: 26,528
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?
2

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

And here some of my own macro shots from the M5...

I had a small light helping me on this one as it was evening, low light indoors. Shot with the 28mm EF-M macro.

Shot in the bright sunlight. Cropped. Shot with the 28mm EF-M macro.

This one is shot with the 24-70mm f/4.0L on the M5

Ha! I knew you were proficient already!!! 

Very nice job.  You did especially well keeping the (flower petals) from blowing out!

Tripod... Gotcha.

I think this will do for a tripod, for the time being.

Cool.  A "grounder" type of tripod can indeed be very useful.

I don't mind the tripod, not at all, so that probably works out OK

A tripod certainly removes some of the technical challenge!

Technique and technical understanding are not the end-all and be-all of good photography, but they're the basis so I'm working on those basics now.

And the nice thing is they'll stay with you (and augment) whatever equipment you do add in the future.

Or perhaps an M5 mark ii. Should probably also have focus-stacking.

I really do hope that an M5 II is released.  Even an M50 with the 32 MP sensor would work for my macros (but I would have to have Focus Bracketing included)!

But I think that I will be better of saving up for a bigger FF DSLR or mirrorless, like a Nikon Z6.

FF will only aid you in a limited number of areas (and actually be a detriment in others, like wildlife reach and macro).  Make sure you'd actually be benefitting (ie. larger prints).

Or perhaps go for the Fuji APS-C cameras, they still appear to be a step up from the M5.

Look at the entire ecosystem, including ergonomics and UI.  They operate VERY differently from Canon.

Some more recent shots I made.

Long exposure night-time shot. (Yes, it was totally dark at night and there was no moon. This is what you get for a 17 minutes exposure... )

Luminmous clouds

Very cool.  Those look like noctilucent clouds!

Happy shooting, and thanks for sharing your images,

R2

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries

 R2D2's gear list:R2D2's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R7 +1 more
jaap51 Forum Member • Posts: 93
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?
1

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

jaap51 wrote:

Pentax k1 has a built in Astro Tracer

What would be your ideal lens on this Pentax for astro photography, and what for wide-angle landscape photography?

I chose the Irix 2.4 15mm. Very usable for both purposes. You need a wide angle lens, and this one gave me the best price/performance imho. You don't need AF in such a lens. Samyang could also be a candidate.

You could also look at the second hand market of course for one of the golden oldies of Pentax.

 jaap51's gear list:jaap51's gear list
Pentax K-1 II Canon EOS M6 II Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +4 more
Tim van der Leeuw Senior Member • Posts: 1,363
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?

jaap51 wrote:

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

jaap51 wrote:

Pentax k1 has a built in Astro Tracer

What would be your ideal lens on this Pentax for astro photography, and what for wide-angle landscape photography?

I chose the Irix 2.4 15mm. Very usable for both purposes. You need a wide angle lens, and this one gave me the best price/performance imho. You don't need AF in such a lens. Samyang could also be a candidate.

You could also look at the second hand market of course for one of the golden oldies of Pentax.

That is a very nice picture and a lot of detail is available both in the dark and in the light areas.

I would love to be able to compare the Pentax directly with my M5, shooting similar photos in same situations with high contrast and challenging light, and I'd love to see the output at high ISO.

However, I'm looking for a camera which will complement my M5 while allowing to keep using my EF mount lenses with an adapter ring.

It looks like the Pentax DSLR will not allow that.

If Pentrax would bring out a mirrorless with a different mount, then perhaps...

I'm not in a hurry to buy a new camera already so they have time.

 Tim van der Leeuw's gear list:Tim van der Leeuw's gear list
Canon EOS M5 Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H2S Sigma 2x EX DG Tele Converter +17 more
jaap51 Forum Member • Posts: 93
Re: How many megapixels do you want in an M?

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

jaap51 wrote:

Tim van der Leeuw wrote:

jaap51 wrote:

Pentax k1 has a built in Astro Tracer

What would be your ideal lens on this Pentax for astro photography, and what for wide-angle landscape photography?

I chose the Irix 2.4 15mm. Very usable for both purposes. You need a wide angle lens, and this one gave me the best price/performance imho. You don't need AF in such a lens. Samyang could also be a candidate.

You could also look at the second hand market of course for one of the golden oldies of Pentax.

That is a very nice picture and a lot of detail is available both in the dark and in the light areas.

I would love to be able to compare the Pentax directly with my M5, shooting similar photos in same situations with high contrast and challenging light, and I'd love to see the output at high ISO.

However, I'm looking for a camera which will complement my M5 while allowing to keep using my EF mount lenses with an adapter ring.

It looks like the Pentax DSLR will not allow that.

If Pentrax would bring out a mirrorless with a different mount, then perhaps...

I'm not in a hurry to buy a new camera already so they have time.

You are right. I had to invest in a new system. Pentax and Canon EOS-M are two different worlds. I keep the M6 for the occasion that I want a light and relative small system.

 jaap51's gear list:jaap51's gear list
Pentax K-1 II Canon EOS M6 II Pentax smc DA* 300mm F4.0 ED (IF) SDM Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +4 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads