DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Olympus E-PL9 mini review

Started Apr 9, 2019 | Discussions
DustyBin
DustyBin Contributing Member • Posts: 745
Re: Correct...

BruceRH wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Till Kamppeter wrote:

EFCS you can get in PASM, by choosing the diamond-marked versions of the settings under the drive modes (down arrow button). Only silent mode (full electronic shutter, heart-marked) is not available there.

Till

and it’s the inability of eshutter in the other modes what kinda sux0rs and could easily be fixed with a firmware upgrade

Nice writeup! I agree that one of the biggest irritations with the E-PL9 and the EM10 MKiii is the lack of e-shutter in PASM modes. I picked up an E-PL9 a while back for something small. The JPEG’s are great and I agree it is fast but I am going to sell it because I want an EVF. I thought I could get along with out one but the EVF is so helpful with my aging eyes. So, I picked up a refurbished EM10 MKiii during Olympus’ latest sale. It is basically the same camera with an EVF and the same needed software updates as the E-PL9 but I knew that going in. I really believe Olympus is missing the boat here by dumbing these small bodies down. I love my EM1 MKii but there are times I want a smaller body and I think there are many others who feel the same way. I understand trying to differentiate between bodies but a camera is a tool. Sometimes you need the big hammer and other times the small but you still use them the same way. I would like to be able to have the same functionality in both sizes.

I too have an M10ii for the same reasons. I did try an EPL9 for a couple of days and could have lived without EVF, but the lack of silent shutter in full PASM was the dealbreaker for me. Don’t always need it, but when you do you miss not having it.

And, the M10ii ‘feels’ better in my hands... anything to encourage taking photos is a good thing!

 DustyBin's gear list:DustyBin's gear list
Sony a9 Sony a7C Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS +6 more
JakeJY Veteran Member • Posts: 5,442
Re: Shadow recovery example- 4 stops, e-shutter

Raist3d wrote:

This is something I can't see the GM5/GX850 doing, simply because in e-shutter they lose 1 stop DR.

While the GM5 does use 10-bit e-shutter, from my testing of the sample I had, the GX850 actually has 12-bit e-shutter. If you have a sample where it drops 1 stop DR I would be curious to see it. Maybe there are different modes where it switches between the two.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/62492124

 JakeJY's gear list:JakeJY's gear list
Nikon Coolpix S9300 Nikon D5000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR +6 more
Simon97
Simon97 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,444
Re: Shadow recovery example- 4 stops, e-shutter

Very interesting. Since my E-PM1 can ruin so many photos through shutter shock, when I got the GX85, I turned e-shutter on from the beginning. I'll have to perform my own test to see if e-shutter is causing enough DR loss to be of concern.

 Simon97's gear list:Simon97's gear list
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS Panasonic Lumix DC-G100
OP (unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 47,805
Re: Shadow recovery example- 4 stops, e-shutter

JakeJY wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

This is something I can't see the GM5/GX850 doing, simply because in e-shutter they lose 1 stop DR.

While the GM5 does use 10-bit e-shutter, from my testing of the sample I had, the GX850 actually has 12-bit e-shutter.

Unfortunatley that’s not my experience   The best way to see this is to shoot something like say is 1600 underexposed  same scene one with e shutter and the other without   I don’t have my gx850 with me but I could get and try by next Sunday

If you have a sample where it drops 1 stop DR I would be curious to see it. Maybe there are different modes where it switches between the two.

there are modes to switch between mechanical and Wah utter like the gm5   It’s pretty much the same as gm5 here except the gx850 benefits from no AA filter than the joeg engine and even raw seems a bit better

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/62492124

-- hide signature --

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell

tenthwashfree Regular Member • Posts: 188
Re: Skin Tones

How do you find the skin tones & colours (jpegs) compared with GX9. From what I have seen of reviews for the GX9, Panasonic seemed to have really improved on their jpegs, especially skin tones. Just wondering if you had any thoughts v the EPL9?

OP (unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 47,805
Re: Skin Tones

tenthwashfree wrote:

How do you find the skin tones & colours (jpegs) compared with GX9. From what I have seen of reviews for the GX9, Panasonic seemed to have really improved on their jpegs, especially skin tones. Just wondering if you had any thoughts v the EPL9?

sorry for the delay   Skintones are ok but all modesty n the epl9 seem more saturated than the same modes on em5 or penf   I guess it’s the market it’s aimed at  you can always dial the saturation and contrast a notch

gx9-Panasonic has indeed improved their color science and overall performance the pretty decent now  in more difficult light or with sone yellows, I would fill give Olympus the edge

-- hide signature --

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell

tedolf
tedolf Forum Pro • Posts: 29,548
Perfect.....
2

It would be perfect if it had the EVF/accesory port.

TEdolph

 tedolf's gear list:tedolf's gear list
Olympus PEN E-P5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 II R Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye +9 more
OP (unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 47,805
Re: Perfect.....
1

tedolf wrote:

It would be perfect if it had the EVF/accesory port.

TEdolph

I think for the target market , ok not to have the evf

but also I think it should be at least 16mp no AA  quite frankly the 20mp no AA

and the selfie screen should come in from the top- the only reason I can think for them using it down is some patent

-- hide signature --

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell

Guy Parsons
Guy Parsons Forum Pro • Posts: 40,000
Re: Olympus E-PL9 mini review
1

Raist3d wrote:

Philly wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Philly wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Philly wrote:

magnesus3 wrote:

Philly wrote:

Does it have EFCS? (sorry, too lazy to look up) That's the main thing that I miss on my E-PM2. I'm not sure why you and others have such a high interest in electronic shutter. For the silent shooting ability? Anyway, if Oly ever puts the 20MP sensor (with PDAF) in a E-PM body for $1,000 or less, I would buy. Guess I may even accept E-PL body size. But the downward tilting selfie screen does seem very awkward.

Electronic shutter beside being silent gives you no shutter shock (very important with some lenses and high res mode), and the normal shutter isn't used meaning it will last longer.

Shutter shock is the main problem with my E-PM2. That's why I want EFCS (Electronic First Curtain Shutter). On subsequent Oly bodies like E-M1, EFCS is sufficient to eliminate shutter shock. It's good enough for me. I don't need electronic shutter--unless it's a global shutter. In fact, I consider electronic shutter a disadvantage much of the time (rolling shutter, limited flash capabilities). So it's always surprising to me that a lot of the GM enthusiasts are so keen for electronic shutter, and so willing to accept the disadvantages for the capability to shoot silently. Or is there anything else? I can't imagine that 1/16,000 shutter speed is an important capability.

1/16,000 is important if you want to shoot with shorter DOF in medium to daylight.

Fair enough. I don't typically try for shallow depth of field in daylight. But in my case, in those rare instances, I usually find myself in lighting situations that require the use of high speed flash--and a mechanical shutter. And 1/8000 is good enough--for me.

The EPL9 doesn't have 1/8000, but 1/4000. I believe same for the other Pens down.

Yes, I believe so. I don't think even E-M5 bodies have 1/8000, but I could be wrong.

EM5 MKII does, and also the Pen-F.

And the severely ignored E-P5 has 1/8000 and EFCS for anti-shock but no fully electronic shutter.

Regards.... Guy

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads