We bought this camera as an upgrade from the Sony Alpha a6000 mainly because of the flip out screen and the mic jack, which the a6000 doesn't have (it has a tilt screen, though). The AF works great and the EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM lens offers a lot for both still photography and for videography as well. On the price point, if that's your main constraint, I think this is a good option.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Better than the a6000
- Thread starter pravious
- Start date
Ian Abrahamson
Forum Enthusiast
I think Sony can become a very expensive operation.
They have fantastic stuff, but i found that i would financially be better
off with a Canon with lenses,accessories and other makes that fit the system.
They have fantastic stuff, but i found that i would financially be better
off with a Canon with lenses,accessories and other makes that fit the system.
T
timbazi
Guest
Is the "good for / bad for" part community rated or your personal opinion(i don't how this works)?
If your personal, can you elaborate on the landscape / scenery score :-O
If your personal, can you elaborate on the landscape / scenery score :-O
Does it have better continuous autofocus than a6000?
I believe in dual pixel technology better than sony's but I tested my M100 and my 2013 NEX-5T for the past two days. Surprisingly, sony did better chasing my kid (faster burst rate and nailing the focus). I just bought the sigma 56/1.4 for sony and I'm wondering if a5100 (same internals as a6000) would be the best body for it.
I believe in dual pixel technology better than sony's but I tested my M100 and my 2013 NEX-5T for the past two days. Surprisingly, sony did better chasing my kid (faster burst rate and nailing the focus). I just bought the sigma 56/1.4 for sony and I'm wondering if a5100 (same internals as a6000) would be the best body for it.
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum