pop2eye wrote:
Another consideration is how many guided yours you will be taking. The average tourist nowadays is taking photos and selfies with their cell phones. The guide and group will not be waiting around while you are changing lenses.
Absolutely, you definitely get left behind or annoy the group with the delays.
For that reason alone, the 12-40mm needs to be your go-to lens. It has a focal range that covers the majority of situations and is fast enough to be used inside churches and museums. On my two most recent international trips to southern Europe and New Zealand, my 12-40mm stayed on my E-M10 the entire time.
As a self organised tourist where time stayed in spots is nearly always at our own discretion, my wife and I take all the time we like to cover what looks like a good place.
Even with the luxury of time the zoom lens always makes way more sense as unexpected things pass by quickly and the zoom often allows a shot as compared to fumbling for the right lens would not.
For me even the 12-40/2.8 was too restrictive and I never changed lenses to the 35-100/2.8 as often as I should have. I should really part with more $$ and get the 12-100/4.
Anyway, this zoom range problem is solved for a Singapore trip very soon as I will only take my Sony RX100 M6 and its "24-200mm" performance will suit me better, and may also prove if this is a worthwhile decision to "abandon" M4/3 for a trip.
The real lesson in the past is when we get home and finally combine all the shots we both take into day dated folders. Mine are a so-so collection, mostly wide, but my wife's is always more enjoyable to look at as she has long used only small pocket cameras with zooms like "28-200mm", "24-300mm" and lastly with "25-450mm" and next trip also with Sony at "24-200mm" that withstands a 2x crop to "400mm" if needed.
I seem to concentrate on scenes as I mostly simply leave the 12-40mm on the camera, meanwhile she gets those scenes and also picks off interesting detail and faces with ease - the same ease that I'm now finding with my Sony with "24-200mm".
The choice seems to be have quality shots but miss the interesting ones and the variety, or indulge in bigger zooms and get all shots but at (maybe invisibly) lesser quality. If the shots are about the memories then the quality never really matters.
As usual I've rambled in my first post for the day, but if there's any lesson at all here that I've learned in the last 60 years of photography, is that a small camera with big zoom makes life so easy and gets more shots.
Regards..... Guy